Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

Ministerial Campus Safety Launch at UFS strengthens commitment to student and staff security

17 March 2025 | Story Tshepo Tsotetsi | Photo Charl Devenish

Safety Campus Launch 2025 — Vice-Chancellor and Principal Prof Hester C. Klopper, Deputy Minister of Police Cassel Mathale, and Free State MEC for Community Safety, Roads, and Transport Jabu Mbalula alongside other members of the newly formed Campus Community Safety Forum.

The University of the Free State (UFS) hosted a two-day Ministerial Campus Safety Launch on 12 and 13 March 2025, a collaborative effort spearheaded by the UFS Protection Services in partnership with the South African Police Service (SAPS) to enhance safety and security for students and staff.

The event, held at the Centenary Complex on the UFS’s Bloemfontein Campus, aimed to address safety concerns, introduce a framework for campus security, and formally launch the Campus Community Safety Forum (CCSF).

Notable attendees included UFS Vice-Chancellor and Principal Prof Hester C. Klopper, Deputy Minister of Police Cassel Mathale, Free State MEC for Community Safety, Roads and Transport Jabu Mbalula, Acting SAPS National Deputy Commissioner for Support Services Lieutenant General Lineo Nkhuoa, Senior Director of Protection Services Noko Masalesa, Deputy Director of Protection Services Cobus van Jaarsveld, representatives from various UFS departments, SAPS officials, and members of the Institutional Student Representative Council (ISRC).

Multi-stakeholder approach to campus safety

As the driving force behind the initiative, the UFS Protection Services played a crucial role in ensuring that safety discussions translated into actionable solutions. Prof Klopper emphasised the importance of a collaborative approach to campus safety, saying, “I believe what makes this initiative destined for success is its focus on cooperation and collaboration. Each stakeholder brings a specific body of expertise to the table.”

The Deputy Minister reaffirmed the SAPS’s commitment to enhancing safety in academic environments. He noted that safety in learning environments remains a key priority for the SAPS. “We are fully aware that we need you [management and the student community] to be part of us in an endeavour to better the crime situation in and around this institution,” he said.

MEC Mbalula acknowledged that safety on campuses requires collaboration from various parties. “Safety on campus is not the responsibility of one entity alone; it requires the involvement of students, faculty, security personnel, law enforcement agencies, and the broader community,” he said.

Identifying key security challenges across UFS campuses

The need for strengthened security measures was reinforced by ISRC representative Ogorogile Moleme, who detailed the safety concerns faced by students on the Bloemfontein, South, and Qwaqwa Campuses.

Muggings, break-ins, and cyber-related crimes remain a challenge for the Bloemfontein Campus, especially in off-campus residences. “While the university has made significant strides to have off-campus security, we have seen an increase in reports of muggings – for example, the incident of a student who was mugged by criminals driving by – break-ins, and cyber-related crimes,” Moleme said.

South Campus faces issues related to accessibility and transport safety, particularly for students living in townships. “Most of our students at the South Campus end up residing ko kasi [in a township], and we know the situation… forcing them to constantly have to go to campus to access resources and study facilities, which thus leave them exposed and vulnerable to mugging, kidnappings, robbery and others.”

On the Qwaqwa Campus, the challenges are heightened by limited police visibility and response times, as well as inadequate lighting in some off-campus residences. “The conditions of the safety of off-campus accommodations there is concerning,” Moleme emphasised.

Launch of the Campus Community Safety Forum (CCSF)

On the second day of the event, the Campus Community Safety Forum (CCSF) was officially launched, marking a critical step in the UFS’s proactive approach to security. The CCSF is a structured body that brings together representatives from the university and the SAPS to enhance collaboration and implement preventative security measures.

Its members include:

• From UFS: Protection Services, ISRC, Division of Student Affairs, Student Counselling and Development, the Gender Equity and Anti-Discrimination Office, the Department of Communication and Marketing, and other key university stakeholders.

• From the SAPS: The Community Police Forum, Youth Crime Prevention Desk, officers from the Park Road Police Station, and additional law enforcement representatives.

Pledge for a safer campus

In a significant move to formalise their commitment, the Deputy Minister, Vice-Chancellor and Principal, MEC, and other key stakeholders signed the Campus Safety Learning Environment Framework, which sets out specific commitments to improve campus safety, with goals including rolling out the framework at the UFS, appointing station liaison officers to coordinate safety efforts, and establishing campus safety committees with representatives from students, Protection Services, and local law enforcement.

This pledge is a testament to the shared responsibility of ensuring student safety across the campus, with a focus on collaboration, accountability, and proactive solutions.

A call for immediate action

Prof Klopper called on all stakeholders to move beyond discussions and take immediate action. “The forum is not merely a discussion platform, but a governance structure with key roles, responsibilities, and decision-making processes,” she said. She also highlighted the importance of this initiative in developing preventive measures and fostering community engagement in safety efforts.

Van Jaarsveld underscored the critical role students play in maintaining a safe campus environment. He introduced the “four R’s” that he believes are key to promoting safety: “We must reduce the likelihood of crime by being proactive in policing and security efforts… [we must] respond, which involves taking swift and effective action, including thorough investigations led by trained professionals... It is essential for students to report incidents as soon as they occur, as safety issues cannot be addressed if they are not reported. Lastly… in the unfortunate event that a student becomes a victim of crime, they must not only survive but recover and overcome the traumatic impact of the experience.”

He emphasised that these actions are not only the responsibility of law enforcement but of everyone on campus, and ended his speech by declaring, “Safety starts with me.” This call to action reinforced the idea that creating a safe environment is a collective effort, one in which every student plays a crucial part.

The MEC reiterated the Free State government’s commitment to student safety, stating, “The launch of the SAPS Campus Safety Initiative marks a new chapter in our collective effort to make UFS a model of security and excellence,” and added that universities must be places “where knowledge thrives without the shadow of fear”.

News Archive

Inaugural lecture: Prof. Phillipe Burger

2007-11-26

Attending the lecture were, from the left: Prof. Tienie Crous (Dean of the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences at the UFS), Prof. Phillipe Burger (Departmental Chairperson of the Department of Economics at the UFS), and Prof. Frederick Fourie (Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS).
Photo: Stephen Collet

A summary of an inaugural lecture presented by Prof. Phillipe Burger on the topic: “The ups and downs of the South African Economy: Rough seas or smooth sailing?”

South African business cycle shows reduction in volatility

Better monetary policy and improvements in the financial sector that place less liquidity constraints on individuals is one of the main reasons for the reduction in the volatility of the South African economy. The improvement in access to the financial sector also enables individuals to manage their debt better.

These are some of the findings in an analysis on the volatility of the South African business cycle done by Prof. Philippe Burger, Departmental Chairperson of the University of the Free State’s (UFS) Department of Economics.

Prof. Burger delivered his inaugural lecture last night (22 November 2007) on the Main Campus in Bloemfontein on the topic “The ups and downs of the South African Economy: Rough seas or smooth sailing?”

In his lecture, Prof. Burger emphasised a few key aspects of the South African business cycle and indicated how it changed during the periods 1960-1976, 1976-1994 en 1994-2006.

With the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as an indicator of the business cycle, the analysis identified the variables that showed the highest correlation with the GDP. During the periods 1976-1994 and 1994-2006, these included durable consumption, manufacturing investment, private sector investment, as well as investment in machinery and non-residential buildings. Other variables that also show a high correlation with the GDP are imports, non-durable consumption, investment in the financial services sector, investment by general government, as well as investment in residential buildings.

Prof. Burger’s analysis also shows that changes in durable consumption, investment in the manufacturing sector, investment in the private sector, as well as investment in non-residential buildings preceded changes in the GDP. If changes in a variable such as durable consumption precede changes in the GDP, it is an indication that durable consumption is one of the drivers of the business cycle. The up or down swing of durable consumption may, in other words, just as well contribute to an up or down swing in the business cycle.

A surprising finding of the analysis is the particularly strong role durable consumption has played in the business cycle since 1994. This finding is especially surprising due to the fact that durable consumption only constitutes about 12% of the total household consumption.

A further surprising finding is the particularly small role exports have been playing since 1960 as a driver of the business cycle. In South Africa it is still generally accepted that exports are one of the most important drivers of the business cycle. It is generally accepted that, should the business cycles of South Africa’s most important trade partners show an upward phase; these partners will purchase more from South Africa. This increase in exports will contribute to the South African economy moving upward. Prof. Burger’s analyses shows, however, that exports have generally never fulfil this role.

Over and above the identification of the drivers of the South African business cycle, Prof. Burger’s analysis also investigated the volatility of the business cycle.

When the periods 1976-1994 and 1994-2006 are compared, the analysis shows that the volatility of the business cycle has reduced since 1994 with more than half. The reduction in volatility can be traced to the reduction in the volatility of household consumption (especially durables and services), as well as a reduction in the volatility of investment in machinery, non-residential buildings and transport equipment. The last three coincide with the general reduction in the volatility of investment in the manufacturing sector. Investment in sectors such as electricity and transport (not to be confused with investment in transport equipment by various sectors) which are strongly dominated by the government, did not contribute to the decrease in volatility.

In his analysis, Prof. Burger supplies reasons for the reduction in volatility. One of the explanations is the reduction in the shocks affecting the economy – especially in the South African context. Another explanation is the application of an improved monetary policy by the South African Reserve Bank since the mid 1990’s. A third explanation is the better access to liquidity and credit since the mid 1990’s, which enables the better management of household finance and the absorption of financial shocks.

A further reason which contributed to the reduction in volatility in countries such as the United States of America’s business cycle is better inventory management. While the volatility of inventory in South Africa has also reduced there is, according to Prof. Burger, little proof that better inventory management contributed to the reduction in volatility of the GDP.

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept