Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
17 March 2025 | Story Tshepo Tsotetsi | Photo Charl Devenish
Safety Campus Launch 2025
Vice-Chancellor and Principal Prof Hester C. Klopper, Deputy Minister of Police Cassel Mathale, and Free State MEC for Community Safety, Roads, and Transport Jabu Mbalula alongside other members of the newly formed Campus Community Safety Forum.

The University of the Free State (UFS) hosted a two-day Ministerial Campus Safety Launch on 12 and 13 March 2025, a collaborative effort spearheaded by the UFS Protection Services in partnership with the South African Police Service (SAPS) to enhance safety and security for students and staff.

The event, held at the Centenary Complex on the UFS’s Bloemfontein Campus, aimed to address safety concerns, introduce a framework for campus security, and formally launch the Campus Community Safety Forum (CCSF).

Notable attendees included UFS Vice-Chancellor and Principal Prof Hester C. Klopper, Deputy Minister of Police Cassel Mathale, Free State MEC for Community Safety, Roads and Transport Jabu Mbalula, Acting SAPS National Deputy Commissioner for Support Services Lieutenant General Lineo Nkhuoa, Senior Director of Protection Services Noko Masalesa, Deputy Director of Protection Services Cobus van Jaarsveld, representatives from various UFS departments, SAPS officials, and members of the Institutional Student Representative Council (ISRC).

Multi-stakeholder approach to campus safety

As the driving force behind the initiative, the UFS Protection Services played a crucial role in ensuring that safety discussions translated into actionable solutions. Prof Klopper emphasised the importance of a collaborative approach to campus safety, saying, “I believe what makes this initiative destined for success is its focus on cooperation and collaboration. Each stakeholder brings a specific body of expertise to the table.”

The Deputy Minister reaffirmed the SAPS’s commitment to enhancing safety in academic environments. He noted that safety in learning environments remains a key priority for the SAPS. “We are fully aware that we need you [management and the student community] to be part of us in an endeavour to better the crime situation in and around this institution,” he said.

MEC Mbalula acknowledged that safety on campuses requires collaboration from various parties. “Safety on campus is not the responsibility of one entity alone; it requires the involvement of students, faculty, security personnel, law enforcement agencies, and the broader community,” he said.

Identifying key security challenges across UFS campuses

The need for strengthened security measures was reinforced by ISRC representative Ogorogile Moleme, who detailed the safety concerns faced by students on the Bloemfontein, South, and Qwaqwa Campuses.

Muggings, break-ins, and cyber-related crimes remain a challenge for the Bloemfontein Campus, especially in off-campus residences. “While the university has made significant strides to have off-campus security, we have seen an increase in reports of muggings – for example, the incident of a student who was mugged by criminals driving by – break-ins, and cyber-related crimes,” Moleme said.

South Campus faces issues related to accessibility and transport safety, particularly for students living in townships. “Most of our students at the South Campus end up residing ko kasi [in a township], and we know the situation… forcing them to constantly have to go to campus to access resources and study facilities, which thus leave them exposed and vulnerable to mugging, kidnappings, robbery and others.”

On the Qwaqwa Campus, the challenges are heightened by limited police visibility and response times, as well as inadequate lighting in some off-campus residences. “The conditions of the safety of off-campus accommodations there is concerning,” Moleme emphasised.

Launch of the Campus Community Safety Forum (CCSF)

On the second day of the event, the Campus Community Safety Forum (CCSF) was officially launched, marking a critical step in the UFS’s proactive approach to security. The CCSF is a structured body that brings together representatives from the university and the SAPS to enhance collaboration and implement preventative security measures.

Its members include:

• From UFS: Protection Services, ISRC, Division of Student Affairs, Student Counselling and Development, the Gender Equity and Anti-Discrimination Office, the Department of Communication and Marketing, and other key university stakeholders.

• From the SAPS: The Community Police Forum, Youth Crime Prevention Desk, officers from the Park Road Police Station, and additional law enforcement representatives.

Pledge for a safer campus

In a significant move to formalise their commitment, the Deputy Minister, Vice-Chancellor and Principal, MEC, and other key stakeholders signed the Campus Safety Learning Environment Framework, which sets out specific commitments to improve campus safety, with goals including rolling out the framework at the UFS, appointing station liaison officers to coordinate safety efforts, and establishing campus safety committees with representatives from students, Protection Services, and local law enforcement.

This pledge is a testament to the shared responsibility of ensuring student safety across the campus, with a focus on collaboration, accountability, and proactive solutions.

A call for immediate action

Prof Klopper called on all stakeholders to move beyond discussions and take immediate action. “The forum is not merely a discussion platform, but a governance structure with key roles, responsibilities, and decision-making processes,” she said. She also highlighted the importance of this initiative in developing preventive measures and fostering community engagement in safety efforts.

Van Jaarsveld underscored the critical role students play in maintaining a safe campus environment. He introduced the “four R’s” that he believes are key to promoting safety: “We must reduce the likelihood of crime by being proactive in policing and security efforts… [we must] respond, which involves taking swift and effective action, including thorough investigations led by trained professionals... It is essential for students to report incidents as soon as they occur, as safety issues cannot be addressed if they are not reported. Lastly… in the unfortunate event that a student becomes a victim of crime, they must not only survive but recover and overcome the traumatic impact of the experience.”

He emphasised that these actions are not only the responsibility of law enforcement but of everyone on campus, and ended his speech by declaring, “Safety starts with me.” This call to action reinforced the idea that creating a safe environment is a collective effort, one in which every student plays a crucial part.

The MEC reiterated the Free State government’s commitment to student safety, stating, “The launch of the SAPS Campus Safety Initiative marks a new chapter in our collective effort to make UFS a model of security and excellence,” and added that universities must be places “where knowledge thrives without the shadow of fear”.

News Archive

Reaction by the Rector of the UFS after a meeting with student leaders
2008-02-25

Reaction by the Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS, Prof. Frederick Fourie, on the agreement reached at a meeting with student leaders held on Friday, 22 February 2008

Note: This is meant to be used together with the full joint statement that was issued by the UFS management and student leaders on 22 February 2008.

The memorandum of the primes of the University of the Free State’s (UFS) residences was handed to top management on Wednesday, 20 February 2008. In the memorandum they asked for a meeting with the UFS management by Friday, 22 February 2008. Such a meeting was arranged and took place.

The UFS top management, all the residence primes as well as the house committee member for first years, the executive of the Main Campus Student Representative Council (SRC) and residence heads were present.

In contrast to what is suggested in the Volksblad report of Saturday, the discussion went off very well. There was no consternation or shouting or “emotions that ran high”. It was a civilised, decent meeting as it should be at a good university. Of course, now and again individuals spoke out strongly and very enthusiastically, but it was all decent and orderly. The contribution of the primes was insightful and well formulated.

Because the top management and I wanted to listen very carefully what the problems and frustrations were, we spent nearly five hours in the meeting. The issues in the memorandum were discussed one by one. In some cases I could take a decision immediately and finalise the matter, in other cases, the management provided information that could largely finalise a matter. A number of other matters must be investigated further.

The management undertook to respond comprehensively and in writing to all the issues raised in the memorandum by Monday, 25 February 2008. This will be handed to the primes but will not be handed to the media beforehand.
It is obvious that there are matters at the university that can be better managed and that there are problems with communication within the Student Affairs division. A major change such as the new policy on diversity places huge demands on management and the administration, and problems were to be expected. However, we understand the frustration of the students in residences.

On the other hand, students don’t always make matters easier. The strong opposition of white student leaders last year, and their unwillingness to co-operate in preparation for 2008 is well known. This year it is going better. But often student leaders take positions that are very inflexible. They also see no room for adapting old habits and simply want their own way. Their contributions are then full of statements such as “It cannot be done”. This delays measures such as the full implementation of expert interpreting services, which, for the management, is a very important measure (and which is functioning very well in certain residences). Communication from student leaders to management is also not always what it should be.

At the end of the meeting student leaders and management reached an important agreement and issued a joint statement in which they committed themselves to the integration process and to good co-operation and communication. This was an important step which is a sign of rebuilding trust. Naturally everyone will still have to work hard to build on this and to strengthen mutual trust.

The course and outcome of Friday’s discussions, as requested by the student leaders, show that issues can be addressed and resolved by means of us talking to one another. This is why it is so sad that primes and house committee members went on strike on Wednesday already and stayed in tents in front of the Main Building – leaving their residences without its leadership. This created an opening for what appears to have been well planned and co-ordinated acts of vandalism by inhabitants of residences on the campus on Wednesday.

Such vandalism is unacceptable and no one can justify it.

Fortunately, order could be restored quickly during the night and all academic activities could resume without any disruption on Thursday and Friday.

FCvN Fourie

Media Release
Issued by: Lacea Loader
Assistant Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2584
Cell: 083 645 2454
E-mail: loaderl.stg@ufs.ac.za   
24 February 2008

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept