Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
13 March 2025 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Tanya Allen
Founders 2025
Celebrating the legacy and achievements of the UFS Business School were, from the left, front: Prof Liezel Massyn, Dr Cornelie Crous; second row: Prof Hendri Kroukamp, Prof Frederick Fourie, Prof Niel Viljoen; third row: Prof Ben Anderson, Prof Tienie Crouse; back: Prof Philippe Burger and Prof Nicolene Barkhuizen.

During a special event held at the Business School on the Bloemfontein Campus on 10 March 2025, the University of the Free State (UFS) paid tribute to the founders and those who helped build the UFS Business School to its current standing.

Those recognised include Prof Frederick Fourie, Prof Niel Viljoen, Prof Helena van Zyl, Prof Tienie Crous, Prof Hendri Kroukamp, and Prof Ben Anderson.

Prof Liezel Massyn, Associate Professor and Programme Director of the Bachelor of Management Leadership (BML) programme in the UFS Business School, welcomed the group of guests. "I remember, as a young academic growing within the faculty, seeing the five leadership principles come to life in practice. These practices demonstrate that a true leader challenges the status quo, inspires a shared vision, empowers others to take action, and leads by example. We have seen this throughout the development and growth of the Business School,” she said.

UFS Business School: a place with heart

According to Prof Philippe Burger, Dean of the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, it was more than a third of a century ago – with the establishment of the Centre for Management Development – that this dream of creating a business programme to support the business community through training and educating people started.

“The UFS Business School is the one business school where a whole career development opportunity is provided. One could come in with just a school qualification and do from a higher certificate to a bachelor's degree, a postgraduate diploma, an MBA, and ultimately even a PhD.”

He continued, “The BML degree offered is unique because it provides individuals in their thirties and forties – who may have missed out on higher education but are ready to step into middle management – the opportunity to get that educational background. It also provides a learning space for those pursuing a bachelor’s degree without having to sit among school leavers. It is something we treasure in the Business School,” he said.

Prof Burger believes the UFS Business School is a place with heart. “It's a place where we care about our students.”

Prof Nicolene Barkhuizen, Director of the UFS Business School, opened her speech with a quote from Theodore Roosevelt: “The more you know about the past, the better prepared you are for the future.” “The best lessons come from the past,” she said, stating that it was a great privilege to celebrate the exceptional leaders who helped build the UFS Business School.

“Your legacy lies not only in what you have achieved, but in the inspiration you're leaving behind. Your contributions have set new standards of excellence, and your legacies will continue to inspire future generations.”

Her call to action was clear, “Honour the past, not just with admiration, but with action. The true essence of leadership is not only in remembering history but also making it.

Impressive reach of the Bachelor in Managerial Leadership

For former UFS Rector and Senior Research Fellow in the Department of Economics and Finance, Prof Frederick Fourie, establishing the Business School was an incredible achievement, despite scepticism about whether the Free State needed it without a strong corporate presence. “But we persevered and created something special that primarily served the needs of businesses in the Free State,” he said.

A key milestone for him was the introduction of the Bachelor of Managerial Leadership (BML) – the vision of Prof Ben Anderson, co-founder and Executive Director of the DaVinci Institute.

Prof Fourie reminisced on the lives that have been transformed – individuals who previously did not have the opportunity to earn a degree but now do, and who go on to become managers, senior managers, directors, and even government leaders. “This makes our Business School unique,” he said, expressing his pride in the MBA and the BML.

The qualification was developed in collaboration with DePaul University in Chicago, known for its expertise in adult learning.

Prof Anderson reflected on the collaborative effort that shaped the programme and highlighted the contributions of 27 corporates and industry representatives in its design, with an emphasis on a transdisciplinary approach that integrates knowledge from various fields to provide a broad and holistic view of managerial leadership. He also acknowledged the programme’s impressive reach, extending beyond South Africa into the broader African continent. He expressed pride in the impact of its graduates in both the public and private sectors.

For Prof Niel Viljoen, the founding director of the Business School and later Vice-Rector: Operations, the greatest highlight was the opportunity to make a lasting difference in people's lives. “It is a wonderful privilege, and we were able to do it for many years and are still doing it now.” He also recalled the first course presentations – from the Management Development Programme to the first MBA class. “It was full of jokes from morning till evening. We once forgot a lecture for the MBA! Moments like those stay with you, because there’s only one first time for everything.”

He also cherished the support from the university leadership, colleagues, and the Free State business community, all of whom played an important role in the school’s success.

Prof Tienie Crous, who became Dean of the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences in 1999, also recalled the agreement with DePaul University. As one of the first four participants in an MBA summer school there, he described how the experience broadened their perspectives and exposed them to a well-run business school. Inspired by this, they returned to teach classes themselves. The faculty also later sent senior colleagues to the United States for six weeks annually to gain industry insights.

Students making a difference

Prof Hendri Kroukamp, Dean of the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences from 2012 to 2022, focused on defining the Business School’s niche alongside then-Director Prof Helena van Zyl. They positioned the school as a leading medium-sized institution, earning national recognition in 2016.

He said when he thinks of the Business School, the staff stand out – their professionalism and dedication to serving students. “These are not first-year students; they are adult learners. Adult learners require a completely different approach – you must, as a lecturer, ensure you are well-prepared and informed, because they will quickly pick up if you are not knowledgeable, and that can cost you credibility.”

He believes that the Business School does more than award qualifications. “We produce students who will make a difference in their communities and environments.”

Prof Helena van Zyl, the longest-serving director of the UFS Business School, was key in shaping it into a boutique business school with strong international ties. Under her leadership, the Business School achieved remarkable milestones, a testament to her impactful leadership. Beyond the UFS, she has also played an important role in the broader organisation of business schools in South Africa by leading in the promotion and advancement of the sector.

News Archive

Stem cell research and human cloning: legal and ethical focal points
2004-07-29

   

(Summary of the inaugural lecture of Prof Hennie Oosthuizen, from the Department of Criminal and Medical Law at the Faculty of Law of the University of the Free State.)

 

In the light of stem cell research, research on embryo’s and human cloning it will be fatal for legal advisors and researchers in South Africa to ignore the benefits that new bio-medical development, through research, contain for this country.

Legal advisors across the world have various views on stem cell research and human cloning. In the USA there is no legislation that regulates stem cell research but a number of States adopted legislation that approves stem cell research. The British Parlement gave permission for research on embryonic stem cells, but determined that it must be monitored closely and the European Union is of the opinion that it will open a door for race purification and commercial exploitation of human beings.

In South Africa the Bill on National Health makes provision for therapeutical and non therapeutical research. It also makes provision for therapeutical embryonical stem cell research on fetuses, which is not older than 14 days, as well as for therapeutical cloning under certain circumstances subject to the approval of the Minister. The Bill prohibits reproductive cloning.

Research on human embrio’s is a very controversial issue, here and in the rest of the world.

Researchers believe that the use of stem cell therapy could help to side-step the rejection of newly transplanted organs and tissue and if a bank for stem cell could be built, the shortage of organs for transplants would become something of the past. Stem cells could also be used for healing of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and spinal injuries.

Sources from which stem cells are obtained could also lead to further ethical issues. Stem cells are harvested from mature human cells and embryonic stem cells. Another source to be utilised is to take egg cells from the ovaries of aborted fetuses. This will be morally unacceptable for those against abortions. Linking a financial incentive to that could become more of a controversial issue because the woman’s decision to abort could be influenced. The ideal would be to rather use human fetus tissue from spontaneous abortions or extra-uterine pregnancies than induced abortions.

The potential to obtain stem cells from the blood of the umbilical cord, bone-marrow and fetus tissue and for these cells to arrange themselves is known for quite some time. Blood from the umbilical cord contains many stem cells, which is the origin of the body’s immune and blood system. It is beneficial to bank the blood of a newborn baby’s umbilical cord. Through stem cell transplants the baby or another family member’s life could be saved from future illnesses such as anemia, leukemia and metabolic storing disabilities as well as certain generic immuno disabilities.

The possibility to withdraw stem cells from human embrio’s and to grow them is more useable because it has more treatment possibilities.

With the birth of Dolly the sheep, communities strongly expressed their concern about the possibility that a new cloning technique such as the replacement of the core of a cell will be used in human reproduction. Embryonic splitting and core replacement are two well known techniques that are associated with the cloning process.

I differentiate between reproductive cloning – to create a cloned human embryo with the aim to bring about a pregnancy of a child that is identical to another individual – and therapeutically cloning – to create a cloned human embryo for research purposes and for healing human illnesses.

Worldwide people are debating whether to proceed with therapeutical cloning. There are people for and against it. The biggest ethical objection against therapeutical cloning is the termination of the development of a potential human being.

Children born from cloning will differ from each other. Factors such as the uterus environment and the environment in which the child is growing up will play a role. Cloning create unique children that will grow up to be unique individuals, just like me and you that will develop into a person, just like you and me. If we understand this scientific fact, most arguments against human cloning will disappear.

Infertility can be treated through in vitro conception. This process does not work for everyone. For some cloning is a revolutionary treatment method because it is the only method that does not require patients to produce sperm and egg cells. The same arguments that were used against in vitro conception in the past are now being used against cloning. It is years later and in vitro cloning is generally applied and accepted by society. I am of the opinion that the same will happen with regard to human cloning.

There is an argument that cloning must be prohibited because it is unsafe. Distorted ideas in this regard were proven wrong. Are these distorted ideas justified to question the safety of cloning and the cloning process you may ask. The answer, according to me, is a definite no. Human cloning does have many advantages. That includes assistance with infertility, prevention of Down Syndrome and recovery from leukemia.

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept