Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
06 May 2025 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Supplied
Tembisa Leeuw
Dr Tembisa Leeuw – awarded her PhD at the UFS – focused her research on protecting the rights of children in conflict with the law and bridging the gap between policy and practice in child and youth care centres.

When Dr Tembisa Leeuw was in Grade 9, four of her classmates were convicted of serious offences, including assault with intent to cause harm and murder. This incident sparked a deep curiosity about the juvenile justice system and how it treats young offenders. She found herself asking difficult questions: Were her peers detained separately from adults? Were they placed in facilities designed specifically for children?

Despite the crimes her classmates committed, Dr Leeuw believed they still needed care and protection. The experience led her to reflect on society’s responsibilities towards young offenders, the difficulties they face in the justice system, and whether the laws meant to protect them are being properly applied. “This formative experience instilled in me a commitment to advocate for the rights of vulnerable children and to ensure that the juvenile justice system upholds principles of care, protection, and rehabilitation,” she says.

Now a human rights officer at the South African Human Rights Commission based in Mpumalanga, Dr Leeuw was recently awarded a Doctor of Philosophy degree at the University of the Free State’s (UFS) autumn graduation ceremony. Her dissertation is titled Protecting the rights of children in conflict with the law in South Africa: The law versus the practice.

Her supervisor, Prof John Mubangizi – Research Professor in the Free State Centre for Human Rights – said it was an absolute privilege to supervise such a brilliant, dedicated, and hard-working student. “Her intellectual curiosity, resolute determination, and unwavering commitment to excellence have been quite inspiring. I have no doubt that she will continue to make a profound impact wherever she goes and whatever she does henceforth.”


Safeguarding the rights and well-being of children

It is well known that a large share of crimes, particularly violent ones, are committed by young people. In South Africa, children are frequently charged with serious offences, such as robbery, rape, assault, and murder. These realities highlight the need for stronger systems that protect the rights and well-being of young people in conflict with the law.

In her research, Dr Leeuw looked at why children in child and youth care centres often face human rights violations, despite the Constitution guaranteeing every child the right to be safe from harm, neglect, and abuse. 

Her findings revealed troubling gaps between what the law says and what happens in practice. According to Dr Leeuw, the Constitution states that children should only be detained as a last resort and for the shortest time possible. UNICEF also emphasises that children must be kept separate from adults in detention and treated in ways that reflect their age and developmental needs, including their right to education. “However, no country has yet built a fully separate juvenile justice system that ensures that children are treated differently from adults,” she says.

Dr Leeuw also found that children in these facilities are often denied access to education. As a result, when they return to their communities, they are often without the skills or qualifications needed to find work. “It is important that these children receive training that enables them to support themselves,” she explains.


Contributing to a humane and equitable society

Dr Leeuw believes that protecting the rights of children in conflict with the law is important to creating a more just and humane society. “Research shows worrying conditions in child and youth care centres (CYCCs) – overcrowding, poor health care, limited education. Many children report violence, intimidation, and neglect, all of which go against the idea of rehabilitation,” she says.

These environments can deepen trauma and increase the chances of reoffending. “The conditions inside detention centres have a serious impact on children's ability to rehabilitate and move forward in life.”

South Africa has made progress in drafting laws to protect children’s rights, but putting those laws into action is still a challenge. “With the right changes and a more caring approach, the justice system can better meet the needs of children,” Dr Leeuw says. She points to several areas where improvements could be made to help policy makers and human rights workers reform juvenile justice.

She notes that although international agreements promote rehabilitation and support, many CYCCs still focus on punishment. “Children often feel abandoned in these spaces. We need to move away from punitive systems and create pathways for healing and reintegration.”

Government departments, such as social development, education, and health, must work together to provide support that meets children's full range of needs. “Current laws must be updated to meet international standards, and programmes are needed to help guide children away from the justice system in the first place,” she adds.

Dr Leeuw also highlights the key role played by child and youth care workers (CYCWs). Their training and regular oversight are important in making sure children’s rights are respected. “Regular monitoring and open reporting are needed to hold facilities accountable,” she says.

She further stresses the need for greater access to mental health support, education, and skills development. This would help children return to school and integrate into society more easily. She also recommends maintaining strong family ties during rehabilitation, including virtual visits for families who live far away. Addressing overcrowding and offering different forms of intervention can also improve care and reduce reoffending.

“Teaching children about their rights and helping them develop a sense of responsibility is just as important. Programmes that promote personal growth and rehabilitation should be part of their daily lives,” she says.


Aligning with international human rights standards

Dr Leeuw’s study closely aligns with international human rights guidelines on juvenile justice. These include the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) and other global frameworks that call for dignity, fairness, and restorative justice in how children are treated. Her work highlights the need to address the root causes of children's behaviour and calls for tailored responses, such as alternatives to incarceration, fair sentencing, and stronger legal protection.

The study also highlights the importance of prevention. Involving communities, improving access to education, and introducing early support systems can help reduce the number of children who come into contact with the justice system. She believes that juvenile justice systems must ultimately uphold the dignity and fair treatment of children, as outlined in both international frameworks and the South African Constitution.

News Archive

Weideman focuses on misconceptions with regard to survival of Afrikaans
2006-05-19

From the left are Prof Magda Fourie (Vice-Rector: Academic Planning), Prof Gerhardt de Klerk (Dean: Faculty of the Humanities), George Weideman and Prof Bernard  Odendaal (acting head of the UFS  Department of Afrikaans and Dutch, German and French). 
Photo (Stephen Collett):

Weideman focuses on misconceptions with regard to survival of Afrikaans

On the survival of a language a persistent and widespread misconception exists that a “language will survive as long as people speak the language”. This argument ignores the higher functions of a language and leaves no room for the personal and historic meaning of a language, said the writer George Weideman.

He delivered the D.F. Malherbe Memorial Lecture organised by the Department Afrikaans at the University of the Free State (UFS). Dr. Weideman is a retired lecturer and now full-time writer. In his lecture on the writer’s role and responsibility with regard to language, he also focused on the language debate at the University of Stellenbosch (US).

He said the “as-long-as-it-is spoken” misconception ignores the characteristics and growth of literature and other cultural phenomena. Constitutional protection is also not a guarantee. It will not stop a language of being reduced to a colloquial language in which the non-standard form will be elevated to the norm. A language only grows when it standard form is enriched by non-standard forms; not when its standard form withers. The growth or deterioration of a language is seen in the growth or decline in its use in higher functions. The less functions a language has, the smaller its chance to survive.

He said Afrikaans speaking people are credulous and have misplaced trust. It shows in their uncritical attitude with regard to the shifts in university policies, university management and teaching practices. Afrikaners have this credulity perhaps because they were spoilt by white supremacy, or because the political liberation process did not free them from a naïve and slavish trust in government.

If we accept that a university is a kind of barometer for the position of a language, then the institutionalised second placing of Afrikaans at most tertiary institutions is not a good sign for the language, he said.

An additional problem is the multiplying effect with, for instance, education students. If there is no need for Afrikaans in schools, there will also be no  need for Afrikaans at universities, and visa versa.

The tolerance factor of Afrikaans speaking people is for some reasons remarkably high with regard to other languages – and more specifically English. With many Afrikaans speaking people in the post-apartheid era it can be ascribed to their guilt about Afrikaans. With some coloured and mostly black Afrikaans speaking people it can be ascribed to the continued rejection of Afrikaans because of its negative connotation with apartheid – even when Afrikaans is the home language of a large segment of the previously oppressed population.

He said no one disputes the fact that universities play a changing role in a transformed society. The principle of “friendliness” towards other languages does not apply the other way round. It is general knowledge that Afrikaans is, besides isiZulu and isiXhosa, the language most spoken by South Africans.

It is typical of an imperialistic approach that the campaigners for a language will be accused of emotional involvement, of sentimentality, of longing for bygone days, of an unwillingness to focus on the future, he said.

He said whoever ignores the emotional aspect of a language, knows nothing about a language. To ignore the emotional connection with a language, leads to another misconception: That the world will be a better place without conflict if the so-called “small languages” disappear because “nationalism” and “language nationalism” often move closely together. This is one of the main reasons why Afrikaans speaking people are still very passive with regard to the Anglicising process: They are not “immune” to the broad influence that promotes English.

It is left to those who use Afrikaans to fight for the language. This must not take place in isolation. Writers and publishers must find more ways to promote Afrikaans.

Some universities took the road to Anglicision: the US and University of Pretoria need to be referred to, while there is still a future for Afrikaans at the Northwest University and the UFS with its parallel-medium policies. Continued debate is necessary.

It is unpreventable that the protest over what is happening to Afrikaans and the broad Afrikaans speaking community must take on a stronger form, he said.

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept