Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

Personal experience drives PhD study on rights of children in conflict with the law

06 May 2025 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Supplied

When Dr Tembisa Leeuw was in Grade 9, four of her classmates were convicted of serious offences, including assault with intent to cause harm and murder. This incident sparked a deep curiosity about the juvenile justice system and how it treats young offenders. She found herself asking difficult questions: Were her peers detained separately from adults? Were they placed in facilities designed specifically for children?

Despite the crimes her classmates committed, Dr Leeuw believed they still needed care and protection. The experience led her to reflect on society’s responsibilities towards young offenders, the difficulties they face in the justice system, and whether the laws meant to protect them are being properly applied. “This formative experience instilled in me a commitment to advocate for the rights of vulnerable children and to ensure that the juvenile justice system upholds principles of care, protection, and rehabilitation,” she says.

Now a human rights officer at the South African Human Rights Commission based in Mpumalanga, Dr Leeuw was recently awarded a Doctor of Philosophy degree at the University of the Free State’s (UFS) autumn graduation ceremony. Her dissertation is titled Protecting the rights of children in conflict with the law in South Africa: The law versus the practice.

Her supervisor, Prof John Mubangizi – Research Professor in the Free State Centre for Human Rights – said it was an absolute privilege to supervise such a brilliant, dedicated, and hard-working student. “Her intellectual curiosity, resolute determination, and unwavering commitment to excellence have been quite inspiring. I have no doubt that she will continue to make a profound impact wherever she goes and whatever she does henceforth.”

Safeguarding the rights and well-being of children

It is well known that a large share of crimes, particularly violent ones, are committed by young people. In South Africa, children are frequently charged with serious offences, such as robbery, rape, assault, and murder. These realities highlight the need for stronger systems that protect the rights and well-being of young people in conflict with the law.

In her research, Dr Leeuw looked at why children in child and youth care centres often face human rights violations, despite the Constitution guaranteeing every child the right to be safe from harm, neglect, and abuse.

Her findings revealed troubling gaps between what the law says and what happens in practice. According to Dr Leeuw, the Constitution states that children should only be detained as a last resort and for the shortest time possible. UNICEF also emphasises that children must be kept separate from adults in detention and treated in ways that reflect their age and developmental needs, including their right to education. “However, no country has yet built a fully separate juvenile justice system that ensures that children are treated differently from adults,” she says.

Dr Leeuw also found that children in these facilities are often denied access to education. As a result, when they return to their communities, they are often without the skills or qualifications needed to find work. “It is important that these children receive training that enables them to support themselves,” she explains.

Contributing to a humane and equitable society

Dr Leeuw believes that protecting the rights of children in conflict with the law is important to creating a more just and humane society. “Research shows worrying conditions in child and youth care centres (CYCCs) – overcrowding, poor health care, limited education. Many children report violence, intimidation, and neglect, all of which go against the idea of rehabilitation,” she says.

These environments can deepen trauma and increase the chances of reoffending. “The conditions inside detention centres have a serious impact on children's ability to rehabilitate and move forward in life.”

South Africa has made progress in drafting laws to protect children’s rights, but putting those laws into action is still a challenge. “With the right changes and a more caring approach, the justice system can better meet the needs of children,” Dr Leeuw says. She points to several areas where improvements could be made to help policy makers and human rights workers reform juvenile justice.

She notes that although international agreements promote rehabilitation and support, many CYCCs still focus on punishment. “Children often feel abandoned in these spaces. We need to move away from punitive systems and create pathways for healing and reintegration.”

Government departments, such as social development, education, and health, must work together to provide support that meets children's full range of needs. “Current laws must be updated to meet international standards, and programmes are needed to help guide children away from the justice system in the first place,” she adds.

Dr Leeuw also highlights the key role played by child and youth care workers (CYCWs). Their training and regular oversight are important in making sure children’s rights are respected. “Regular monitoring and open reporting are needed to hold facilities accountable,” she says.

She further stresses the need for greater access to mental health support, education, and skills development. This would help children return to school and integrate into society more easily. She also recommends maintaining strong family ties during rehabilitation, including virtual visits for families who live far away. Addressing overcrowding and offering different forms of intervention can also improve care and reduce reoffending.

“Teaching children about their rights and helping them develop a sense of responsibility is just as important. Programmes that promote personal growth and rehabilitation should be part of their daily lives,” she says.

Aligning with international human rights standards

Dr Leeuw’s study closely aligns with international human rights guidelines on juvenile justice. These include the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) and other global frameworks that call for dignity, fairness, and restorative justice in how children are treated. Her work highlights the need to address the root causes of children's behaviour and calls for tailored responses, such as alternatives to incarceration, fair sentencing, and stronger legal protection.

The study also highlights the importance of prevention. Involving communities, improving access to education, and introducing early support systems can help reduce the number of children who come into contact with the justice system. She believes that juvenile justice systems must ultimately uphold the dignity and fair treatment of children, as outlined in both international frameworks and the South African Constitution.

News Archive

Questions about racial integration in residences answered

2007-07-31

Answers to frequently asked questions about the racial integration of student residences at the UFS

1. Why does the UFS want to change the current situation in the student residences?

There are many reasons why a new approach to placement in the student residences is necessary. However, the main reason is of an educational nature. As a university, the UFS should create an environment in its residences where students can learn to appreciate and respect the rich diversity that is on offer at the university. A university accommodates students from many different backgrounds in terms of race, language, religion, economic status, culture and other aspects. If a student can learn to appreciate the value in this rich diversity at university, he or she will also be able to appreciate the value of this diversity in the workplace and broader society.

The current situation of predominantly white and predominantly black residences has not been able to cultivate such an appreciation for diversity and respect for one another as human beings, and will not equip students with the knowledge and skills required to manage diversity.

Besides this, there are many other areas of life in the residences that need attention. For one, we need to urgently establish a human rights culture in the residences so that the rights of all students can be respected. We need to address the abuse of alcohol, provide disabled students with their rightful place, and last but not least, really entrench a culture of learning in student residences.

Let us make the residences places we can be proud of – places of learning, of diversity, of respect; places of growth and development. This is the ideal we should all strive to achieve.

2. Why does the management want to force us to integrate?

It is a false argument to debate the issue in terms of “force”. Any decision by a University, or any other organisation, regarding matters of policy, rules and regulations implies a restriction on the choice of an individual and an obligation to comply. What we should focus on is whether this decision of the Council is in the best interests of our students.

The management of the university believes that it has a responsibility to give students the best education possible, not only in terms of what you learn in the lecture rooms, but especially in the residences as well. The residences can be very powerful places of learning about matters of great importance, both academic and non-academic.

The parallel-medium language policy separates students into largely white/Afrikaans and black/English classes. Efforts are being made to bridge this divide in the classroom, but we can also try to eliminate it in the residences.

The university is committed to building a new culture for the entire institution that is based on values and principles – such as an academic culture, non-racialism, respect for human rights and diversity – among staff and students.

In the context of student residences, the application of these values and principles still allows substantial room for the voluntary exercising of choice by individuals as well as by Residence Committees, notably with regard to the placement of students (they can still place 50 percent of first-year students), as well as the determination of the future character and traditions of a diverse residence.

Furthermore, students can still choose their residences (subject to availability of places), can choose a roommate, and so forth.

3. What about freedom of association?

The rights we enjoy in a democracy must be balanced against other rights, as well as the laws of the country. This means that the right to freedom of association must be balanced against laws that make it illegal to discriminate against other people on the basis of race, language or religion, for instance.

Freedom of association pertains to the right of individuals to form voluntary organisations such as clubs or private boarding houses, or their right to join or not join existing organisations. You exercise that right when you decide to become a student of the UFS, and again when you choose to live in one of its residences.

However, once you have decided to join an organisation voluntarily, you cannot subsequently demand that that organisation should provide a “club” or residence to your liking where, for instance, you only associate with your choice of co-members. You must accept the policies of that organisation.

In any case, how would that right of yours be balanced against the right of another individual who wishes to associate with a different set of co-members? (For instance – what about the freedom of a student to associate with students NOT from his own background, but indeed from another language, cultural, racial or economic background?)

The constitutional right to freedom of association can, in any case, not be used to exclude or discriminate on the basis of race or religion (Section 18 of the Bill of Rights).

Besides, the new policy guidelines will still make provision for freedom of association. This right can be exercised freely within a diverse residence with regard to friendships, joint academic work, socialising, sport, etc.

4. Will residences not lose their traditions?

The University appreciates that there are many valuable elements of tradition in residences. However, we must bear in mind that the traditions and character of student residences have evolved and changed over time, and they will continue to evolve and to change. In addition, we do not need to accept all aspects of residence life purely on the basis of tradition, including the unacceptably high level of alcohol abuse and unsavoury, humiliating and discriminatory orientation practices. The new approach to integrated residences provides the opportunity to retain the positive aspects of the current traditions and character, but also to develop new traditions and give residences a new character.

We can now establish a tradition and a character for each residence that are reconcilable with the values of the University as a place of scholarship and are aligned with the human rights approach of our country’s Constitution, the laws of our country and the strengths and diversity of the students in a particular residence.

5. Have students been involved in this process? Is there a role for them to play after the decision has been taken by the Council of the UFS?

In the first semester of 2007, during two rounds of consultations, the primes, SRC and student organisations were consulted about the proposed new placement policy to increase diversity in residences. Some residences also made written submissions on the matter (such as Madelief, Soetdoring, Wag-'n-bietjie, Vergeet-my-nie, Emily Hobhouse). Other residences requested and were granted more time, but did not make any submissions in the end (such as Reitz and Armentum).

Management also had several meetings with the above-mentioned structures to hear first-hand from students their concerns and solutions regarding possible challenges presented by integration in residences.

During these interactions, several excellent ideas and proposals were put forward by students. These views had a definite impact on the eventual proposal that was taken to the University Council, in particular regarding the minimum level of diversity (30%) in junior residences and the fact that residences still want to have a say in the placement of students, rather than the placement decision being left in the hands of Management alone (hence the 50% placement portion of residences). Management values the effort that was put into the process by the primes and residence committees, and thanks them for their contributions.

However, it should be stressed that consultation should not be understood as a process of negotiation, nor does it imply that consensus must be reached. What it means is that Management must take a considered decision after hearing the views of stakeholders.

Management would like students to continue to provide input and ideas regarding the implementation details of the policy guidelines. Task teams have been established and students will be informed about how they can interact with the task teams on an ongoing basis.

6. But integration in the residences was tried in the past (in the late 1990s), and then it failed. Why will it work now?

Yes, the University of the Free State did integrate its residences as far back as 1993, and for a few years it worked. The UFS did it at that time and is now doing so again, because it is the right thing to do. Yet it is important to understand why the previous attempt at racial integration in residences was not successful.

Firstly, both black and white students were much polarised because of the apartheid past. Secondly, there was insufficient management support for students in the residences, the student leaders generally as well as residence heads, in terms of dealing with diversity and related issues. Thirdly, the institutional culture of the UFS and the residences in particular was not addressed as part of broader transformation and integration in residences, whereas it is now being addressed.

In addition, the current decision to integrate residences has the benefit of being implemented after several more years of integration in schooling, sport, workplaces and other aspects of life.

This decision is also based on Management’s commitment to give all the possible support it can to this process.

This is a very important initiative that the UFS is undertaking. Management, in co-operation with students, must ensure that it succeeds. Integrated residences that produce high-quality graduates equipped to deal with the challenges of the workplace and our society is a worthwhile ideal we should all strive to achieve.

If you would like to make a proposal regarding the implementation and practical aspects of the new policy, please send it to the following email address: rector@ufs.ac.za

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept