Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
26 May 2025 | Story Tshepo Tsotetsi | Photo Stephen Collett
From left: Prof Anthea Rhoda (UFS Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Academic), Prof Henk de Jager (CEO, THENSA), Prof Joyce Nduna (ETDP SETA Chair, CPUT), Prof Hester C. Klopper (UFS Vice-Chancellor and Principal), and Prof Vasu Reddy (UFS Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Research and Internationalisation) at the UFS Senate Conference 2025.

The University of the Free State (UFS) hosted its second Senate Conference on 19 and 20 May 2025 at its Bloemfontein Campus, drawing together the university’s leadership, senators, and key stakeholders from across three campuses. 

Centred on the theme ‘A Call for Innovation: Reimagining Work-Integrated Learning at the UFS’, the two-day conference offered space for robust and critical dialogue on how work-integrated learning (WIL) can be deepened, diversified, and more purposefully embedded into the university’s academic project.

The conference was conceptualised and coordinated by Prof Vasu Reddy, Deputy Vice-Chancellor for Research and Internationalisation, and Prof Anthea Rhoda, Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Academic, supported by a university-wide organising committee.

Over the two days, WIL was framed not as a supplementary offering but as central to shaping responsive, relevant academic interventions. In her address, UFS Vice-Chancellor and Principal Prof Hester C. Klopper, who is also Chairperson of the UFS Senate, urged members of the Senate to move beyond surface-level adjustments. “Real positive change will not come by merely panel-beating and tweaking what we already have, but rather by fundamentally reimagining work-integrated learning for the higher education landscape and the future we aspire to create,” she said.

Prof Reddy said the theme was a logical choice, as it incrementally builds upon another key component of UFS’s academic project, namely ‘engaged scholarship’ – which was the focus of the Senate Conference’s 2024 theme, ‘Making Change through Engaged Scholarship’. “WIL is known by many names – work placements, internships, practicums, cooperative education, field work, etcetera,” he said. “In fact, it represents a range of approaches and strategies that integrate theory and practice to explore self-identity, develop employability skills, and acquire professional acumen with deliberate and intentional action.”

 

Connecting learning and practice

“WIL is not additive, it is integral and must be integrated into our teaching, learning, research, and engaged scholarship,” Prof Klopper said. She emphasised a human-centred approach despite increasing digital integration: “Technology without human interaction is meaningless. We must ensure that we remain human-centred in all our endeavours, because being disembodied means that we are also disengaged.”

Prof Rhoda reflected on UFS’s potential to advance the conversation: “We have the human capital, the academic acumen, and the vast potential to take [WIL] to a new level, and to tangibly improve the quality and work-readiness of the graduates we produce.”

Faculties also shared their existing WIL practices through case studies, while structured group discussions on both days allowed participants to engage in smaller breakout sessions where they explored guided questions and provided feedback.

A key moment of the conference was the screening of Work Shoes, a documentary produced by Charlene Stanley, a UFS alumna and award-winning television producer. The film,  commissioned by Prof Reddy and Lacea Loader, UFS Senior Director: Communication and Marketing, followed the WIL journeys of four UFS students from diverse disciplines, offering a student-centred perspective on how learning translates into community impact.  

“The film, typical of all documentaries, offers a visual and cinematic format to spotlight opportunities to explore, reveal, interpret and understand and examine the errors of our world,” Prof Reddy said. He emphasised that “the film was not simply framing fault lines, but also captured connections and prospects for how we reflect on our teaching, learning and practice.” 

Prof Rhoda added, “These were four very diverse students with very different stories, but what they clearly have in common is a keen sense that work experience is all about service and about making a difference and improving the lives of individuals and communities.” 

 

Guest voices on innovation and integration

The programme included insights from four external guest speakers, each representing key areas of expertise (industry, academic, and practice), who addressed the evolution of WIL from different angles:

Advocate Navilla Somaru, Director of Public Prosecutions in the Free State, shared insights into the ‘In the Shadow of the Prosecutor’ programme, a partnership between the NPA and the UFS Faculty of Law which enables final-year law students to shadow prosecutors, bridging the gap between academic theory and practice.

Prof Joyce Nduna, Education, Training and Development Practices Sector Education and Training Authority (ETDP SETA) Research Chair at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology (CPUT), focused on designing innovative WIL practices that support transdisciplinary engagement. She spoke on the role of mutual learning, interdisciplinary teams, and curriculum flexibility in aligning academic goals with societal needs.

Prof Per Assmo, Deputy Vice-Chancellor for Internationalisation at Sweden’s University West, presented on rethinking WIL as an academic discipline. He highlighted University West’s Master’s in Work Integrated Political Studies (WIPS) – a two-year international programme combining theory with research internships – as well as the institution’s unique PhD in Work-Integrated Learning.

Prof Henk de Jager, CEO of the Technological Higher Education Network South Africa (THENSA), discussed stakeholder engagement in the context of WIL. He shared key principles for strengthening collaboration and encouraged UFS to develop an engagement model suited to its own identity and institutional goals.

 

Reflections and forward momentum

Prof Rhoda noted the value of partnerships that create mutual benefit. Referring to Advocate Somaru’s presentation, she observed: “Not only has the ‘In the Shadow of the Prosecutor’ programme been a learning opportunity for our students, it has also been an opportunity for the relevant prosecutors to look with new eyes at their profession … and to maybe even recognise issues and shortfalls in their workplace environment that they have become used to.” She also noted the continuity of thought from last year’s inaugural Senate Conference and its focus on engaged scholarship. “I find it quite significant and beautiful how our discussions today actually dovetailed with many of the sentiments that transpired from that first conference,” she said.

Prof Reddy reflected that, “It was clear to me there was a greater level of intellectual and participatory energy demonstrated by our Senators, evident in their presence, ideas, and constructive engagement with the topic. It seems that our colleagues were curious to passionately explore how better to be innovative in our collective effort to further drive the teaching, learning, and research agenda triggered by the topic into the future.”

In her closing remarks, Prof Klopper stated that the reimagining of WIL connects deeply with the three pillars of the university’s Vision 130: “Academic excellence with quality and impact; maximum societal impact through sustainable relationships; and being a diverse, inclusive, and equitable university are the foundation on which our approach to WIL must be built.”

The 2025 Senate Conference reinforced that meaningful WIL cannot happen in silos. It demands shared responsibility, innovation through connection, and a clear commitment to putting students and society at the centre of the academic project.

 

Programme

Click to view document UFS 2025 Senate Conference Programme

 

Documentary Film: Work Shoes

 

Presentations

News Archive

Census 2011 overshadowed by vuvuzela announcements
2012-11-20

Mike Schüssler, economist
Photo: Hannes Pieterse
15 November 2012

Census 2011 contains good statistics but these are overshadowed by vuvuzela announcements and a selective approach, economist Mike Schüssler said at a presentation at the UFS.

“Why highlight one inequality and not another success factor? Is Government that negative about itself?” Mr Schüssler, owner of Economist.co.za, asked.

“Why is all the good news such as home ownership, water, lights, cars, cellphones, etc. put on the back burner? For example, we have more rooms than people in our primary residence. Data shows that a third of Africans have a second home. Why are some statistics that are racially based not made available, e.g. orphans? So are “bad” statistics not always presented?”

He highlighted statistics that did not get the necessary attention in the media. One such statistic is that black South Africans earn 46% of all income compared to 39% of whites. The census also showed that black South Africans fully own nearly ten times the amount of houses that whites do. Another statistic is that black South Africans are the only population group to have a younger median age. “This is against worldwide trends and in all likelihood has to do with AIDS. It is killing black South Africans more than other race groups.”

Mr Schüssler also gave insight into education. He said education does count when earnings are taken into account. “I could easily say that the average degree earns nearly five times more than a matric and the average matric earns twice the pay of a grade 11.”

He also mentioned that people lie in surveys. On the expenditure side he said, “People apparently do not admit that they gamble or drink or smoke when asked. They also do not eat out but when looking at industry and sector sales, this is exposed and the CPI is, for example, reweighted. They forget their food expenditure and brag about their cars. They seemingly spend massively on houses but little on maintenance. They spend more than they earn.”

“On income, the lie is that people forget or do not know the difference between gross and net salaries. People forget garnishee orders, loan repayments and certainly do not have an idea what companies pay on their behalf to pensions and medical aid. People want to keep getting social grants so they are more motivated to forget income. People are scared of taxes too so they lower income when asked. They spend more than they earn in many categories.”

On household assets Mr Schüssler said South Africans are asset rich but income poor. Over 8,3 million black African families stay in brick or concrete houses out of a total of 11,2 million total. About 4,9 million black families own their own home fully while only 502 000 whites do (fully paid off or nearly ten times more black families own their own homes fully). Just over 880 000 black South Africans are paying off their homes while 518 000 white families are.

Other interesting statistics are that 13,2 million people work, 22,5 million have bank accounts, 19,6 million have credit records. Thirty percent of households have cars, 90% of households have cellphones and 80% of households have TVs.
 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept