Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
19 November 2025 | Story Precious Shamase | Photo Blackhood Photography
Community Development Conference
Attendees at the Community Development Conference 2025.

The University of the Free State (UFS) proudly hosted South Africa's inaugural Community Development Conference, a landmark national event. Held at the scenic Golden Gate Hotel and Chalets, the conference drew an overwhelming oversubscription of 205 delegates, bringing together a diverse community of practitioners, academics, government representatives, and civil society under the theme: "Grounding the future: Community voices and practice pathways for inclusive development." 

In his opening and welcome address, Prof Mogomme Masoga, Dean of the Faculty of the Humanities, expressed deep gratitude for the extensive support received. "Thank you to the government departments represented here - Social Development, CoGTA, Health, and others - as well as to the many non-profit organisations that have lent their unwavering support," he said, emphasising the importance of inter-sectoral collaboration. 

 

National and international collaboration 

The UFS worked in strategic partnership with the University of Johannesburg (UJ), the University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), and the University of the Western Cape (UWC) to bring this significant platform to life. This collaboration reinforced the message that community development is "everyone’s business", a sentiment reflected in the broad and diverse participation. 

International representation included delegates from Botswana, Zimbabwe, Austria, Nigeria, Lesotho, and Eswatini, alongside participants linked to institutions in Germany and North America. Nationally, delegates travelled from across South Africa – including the Western Cape, North-West, Northern Cape, Gauteng, and KwaZulu-Natal - demonstrating the conference's wide-reaching relevance and appeal. 

 

Keynote address: Managing the developmental state 

A major highlight of the second day was the keynote address delivered by Onkematse Kabasia, Head of the Department of Social Development in KwaZulu-Natal. His presentation, titled "South Africa's path to a developmental state: A managerial analysis of the Department of Social Development's transition," offered a compelling exploration of the shifts required within government departments to effectively manage and advance the objectives of a developmental state. 

Kabasia outlined the managerial challenges and institutional reforms necessary to transition from a predominantly welfare-oriented system to one that actively drives inclusive social and economic development. His insights sparked robust discussion among academics, practitioners, and government delegates, highlighting the crucial role of efficient public-sector management in strengthening the community development sector ahead of the 2026 National Community Development Conference. 

 

Charting the path to 2026 

More than a standalone event, the inaugural conference forms part of a strategic lead-up to the 2026 National Community Development Conference. Its core purpose was to elevate community voices, promote ethical practice, and build collaborative pathways toward a professionalised, effective community development sector in South Africa.

The programme offered a rich and balanced mix of academic papers, interactive panel discussions, and practical workshops, ensuring a comprehensive exploration of the conference theme. 

A notable highlight from the first day included an address by Norman (Pankie) Matomela on "CoGTA and Community Work," followed by an insightful national perspective on community development presented by Peter Netshipale. These contributions laid a strong foundation for the discussions that followed. 

 

Advancing action research and policy implementation  

A key takeaway from the conference was the strong collective commitment to Action Research and the translation of policy into effective practice. Delegates expressed a shared resolve to move beyond theoretical discussion toward tangible, results-oriented community development. 

Participants agreed that effective community development requires: 

Action research: The use of participatory methodologies that engage communities directly and deliver practical, context-specific solutions. 

Policy implementation: The successful operationalisation of high-level policies - such as those discussed by keynote speakers Kabasia and Matomela - into on-the-ground interventions that drive inclusive development. 

This emphasis on results and accountability underscores the conference's role as a crucial step toward a more professionalised and impactful community development sector in South Africa.

News Archive

Reaction by the Rector of the UFS after a meeting with student leaders
2008-02-25

Reaction by the Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS, Prof. Frederick Fourie, on the agreement reached at a meeting with student leaders held on Friday, 22 February 2008

Note: This is meant to be used together with the full joint statement that was issued by the UFS management and student leaders on 22 February 2008.

The memorandum of the primes of the University of the Free State’s (UFS) residences was handed to top management on Wednesday, 20 February 2008. In the memorandum they asked for a meeting with the UFS management by Friday, 22 February 2008. Such a meeting was arranged and took place.

The UFS top management, all the residence primes as well as the house committee member for first years, the executive of the Main Campus Student Representative Council (SRC) and residence heads were present.

In contrast to what is suggested in the Volksblad report of Saturday, the discussion went off very well. There was no consternation or shouting or “emotions that ran high”. It was a civilised, decent meeting as it should be at a good university. Of course, now and again individuals spoke out strongly and very enthusiastically, but it was all decent and orderly. The contribution of the primes was insightful and well formulated.

Because the top management and I wanted to listen very carefully what the problems and frustrations were, we spent nearly five hours in the meeting. The issues in the memorandum were discussed one by one. In some cases I could take a decision immediately and finalise the matter, in other cases, the management provided information that could largely finalise a matter. A number of other matters must be investigated further.

The management undertook to respond comprehensively and in writing to all the issues raised in the memorandum by Monday, 25 February 2008. This will be handed to the primes but will not be handed to the media beforehand.
It is obvious that there are matters at the university that can be better managed and that there are problems with communication within the Student Affairs division. A major change such as the new policy on diversity places huge demands on management and the administration, and problems were to be expected. However, we understand the frustration of the students in residences.

On the other hand, students don’t always make matters easier. The strong opposition of white student leaders last year, and their unwillingness to co-operate in preparation for 2008 is well known. This year it is going better. But often student leaders take positions that are very inflexible. They also see no room for adapting old habits and simply want their own way. Their contributions are then full of statements such as “It cannot be done”. This delays measures such as the full implementation of expert interpreting services, which, for the management, is a very important measure (and which is functioning very well in certain residences). Communication from student leaders to management is also not always what it should be.

At the end of the meeting student leaders and management reached an important agreement and issued a joint statement in which they committed themselves to the integration process and to good co-operation and communication. This was an important step which is a sign of rebuilding trust. Naturally everyone will still have to work hard to build on this and to strengthen mutual trust.

The course and outcome of Friday’s discussions, as requested by the student leaders, show that issues can be addressed and resolved by means of us talking to one another. This is why it is so sad that primes and house committee members went on strike on Wednesday already and stayed in tents in front of the Main Building – leaving their residences without its leadership. This created an opening for what appears to have been well planned and co-ordinated acts of vandalism by inhabitants of residences on the campus on Wednesday.

Such vandalism is unacceptable and no one can justify it.

Fortunately, order could be restored quickly during the night and all academic activities could resume without any disruption on Thursday and Friday.

FCvN Fourie

Media Release
Issued by: Lacea Loader
Assistant Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2584
Cell: 083 645 2454
E-mail: loaderl.stg@ufs.ac.za   
24 February 2008

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept