Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
20 October 2025 | Story Andre Damons | Photo Supplied
Down Syndrome

As South Africa marks Down Syndrome Awareness Day on 20 October, it is worth pausing to celebrate the incredible children who light up our lives and the parents who walk this journey with them. Down Syndrome is the most common chromosomal disorder, causing intellectual disability. 

According to Down Syndrome South Africa, one in every 600 babies born in developing countries has Down syndrome. Data on the prevalence in South Africa remain limited, however, earlier estimates suggest about one in every 770 births. Although Down syndrome is not curable, children with the condition have many abilities and strengths. It is, therefore, vital that families engage in interventions that help children reach their full developmental potential. 

Dr Olive Khaliq, Senior Lecturer in the Department of Paediatrics and Child Health at the University of the Free State (UFS), says most interventions rightly focus on the child, but there is growing recognition that parents are just as central to their children's progress. The home is the first and most consistent environment where development occurs. Parenting a child with Down syndrome can, however, be influenced by the social context. 

 

Empowering programme 

“In South Africa, cultural beliefs and community attitudes often shape how families cope and seek support. Some parents fear disclosing the child's disability due to fear of being judged or the long-standing myth that Down syndrome is a curse or a punishment.  

“This can lead to isolation or delays in accessing interventions that could make a difference. Empowering parents with knowledge and practical tools are therefore essential, not only for their children's development, but also for their own well-being,” she says. 

A remarkable example of such empowerment is the Developmental Resource Stimulation Programme (DRSP), a home-based programme designed by Dr Dorothy Russell from the Department of Paediatrics and Child Health. The DRSP, designed for children with Down syndrome from birth to 42 months, combines structured play and guided parent-child interaction, helping parents to stimulate their child's cognitive, fine-motor, gross motor, and language development using everyday household items such as teaspoons, tumblers, and face cloths. Previous quantitative research shows that children whose parents participated in the programme made measurable developmental gains. 

 

Feedback from parents 

In 2024, Drs Khaliq and Russell, together with Prof Gladys Kigozi-Male, Associate Professor in the UFS Centre for Health Systems Research and Development, received an interdisciplinary grant from the UFS to explore the experiences of parents regarding the DRSP. They engaged 31 parents of children with Down syndrome in individual interviews and focus group discussions. According to Kigozi-Male, findings revealed overwhelmingly positive experiences. Parents reported feeling more capable and more connected with their children. “One parent shared: ‘It [the DRSP] helped me to become closer to her, and to know her better, and to know what she’s capable of … my child can do anything that we wanted her to do …  she’s capable of everything, and that if we follow this programme, she [will] become very strong and capable,” said Prof Kigozi-Male.   

Another parent reflected on the knowledge gained: “… the knowledge that I didn’t have before …  as a mother of a Down syndrome baby – but for any mother …  I have learned so much, and it is what any mother should know …” Parents also noted visible improvements in their children’s development, particularly in muscle strength, crawling and walking with one parent explaining “It really changed a lot …  my child's neck was not okay, so the programme taught us how to train the neck muscle. Even when they started walking or crawling, it really helped a lot …” 

Another parent highlighted how the programme strengthened their confidence as caregivers saying “… I don't think we would have come this far without the programme because it helped us understand my child … Without the programme I don't think he would have been so strong because we wouldn't have known how to help him ...”

The DRSP, explains Dr Russell, is just one example of what can happen when parents are treated as active partners rather than passive recipients of care. Going forward, it is important that parents' voices continue to shape how interventions are designed and delivered. Their lived experiences are powerful sources of knowledge on what works in real settings.  

“As we commemorate Down Syndrome Awareness Day, let's remember that inclusion begins with understanding, and understanding grows when we listen to families, parents, and children who remind us that every life matters,” concluded Dr Khaliq. 

News Archive

The TRC legitimised apartheid - Mamdani
2010-07-20

 Prof. Mahmood Mamdani
“The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) accepted as legitimate the rule of law that undergirded apartheid. It defined as crime only those acts that would have been considered criminal under the laws of apartheid.”

This statement was made by the internationally acclaimed scholar, Prof. Mahmood Mamdani, when he delivered the Africa Memorial Lecture at the University of the Free State (UFS) last week on the topic: Lessons of Nuremberg and Codesa: Where do we go from here?

“According to the TRC, though crimes were committed under apartheid, apartheid itself – including the law enforced by the apartheid state – was not a crime,” he said.

He said the social justice challenges that South Africa faced today were as a result of the TRC’s failure to broaden the discussion of justice beyond political to social justice.

He said it had to go beyond “the liberal focus on bodily integrity” and acknowledge the violence that deprived the vast majority of South Africans of their means of livelihood.

“Had the TRC acknowledged pass laws and forced removals as constituting the core social violence of apartheid, as the stuff of extra-economic coercion and primitive accumulation, it would have been in a position to imagine a socio-economic order beyond a liberalised post-apartheid society,” he said.

“It would have been able to highlight the question of justice in its fullness, and not only as criminal and political, but also as social.”

He said the TRC failed to go beyond the political reconciliation achieved at Codesa and laid the foundation for a social reconciliation. “It was unable to think beyond crime and punishment,” he said.

He said it recognised as victims only individuals and not groups, and human rights violations only as violations of “the bodily integrity of an individual”; that is, only torture and murder.

“How could this be when apartheid was brazenly an ideology of group oppression and appropriation? How could the TRC make a clear-cut distinction between violence against persons and that against property when most group violence under apartheid constituted extra-economic coercion, in other words, it was against both person and property?”, he asked.

“The TRC was credible as performance, as theatre, but failed as a social project”.

Prof. Mamdani is the Director of the Institute of Social Research at the Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda; and the Herbert Lehman Professor of Government in the Department of Anthropology at the Columbia University in New York, USA.

Media Release
Issued by: Mangaliso Radebe
Assistant Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2828
Cell: 078 460 3320
E-mail: radebemt@ufs.ac.za  
20 July 2010
 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept