Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
20 October 2025 | Story Andre Damons | Photo Supplied
Down Syndrome

As South Africa marks Down Syndrome Awareness Day on 20 October, it is worth pausing to celebrate the incredible children who light up our lives and the parents who walk this journey with them. Down Syndrome is the most common chromosomal disorder, causing intellectual disability. 

According to Down Syndrome South Africa, one in every 600 babies born in developing countries has Down syndrome. Data on the prevalence in South Africa remain limited, however, earlier estimates suggest about one in every 770 births. Although Down syndrome is not curable, children with the condition have many abilities and strengths. It is, therefore, vital that families engage in interventions that help children reach their full developmental potential. 

Dr Olive Khaliq, Senior Lecturer in the Department of Paediatrics and Child Health at the University of the Free State (UFS), says most interventions rightly focus on the child, but there is growing recognition that parents are just as central to their children's progress. The home is the first and most consistent environment where development occurs. Parenting a child with Down syndrome can, however, be influenced by the social context. 

 

Empowering programme 

“In South Africa, cultural beliefs and community attitudes often shape how families cope and seek support. Some parents fear disclosing the child's disability due to fear of being judged or the long-standing myth that Down syndrome is a curse or a punishment.  

“This can lead to isolation or delays in accessing interventions that could make a difference. Empowering parents with knowledge and practical tools are therefore essential, not only for their children's development, but also for their own well-being,” she says. 

A remarkable example of such empowerment is the Developmental Resource Stimulation Programme (DRSP), a home-based programme designed by Dr Dorothy Russell from the Department of Paediatrics and Child Health. The DRSP, designed for children with Down syndrome from birth to 42 months, combines structured play and guided parent-child interaction, helping parents to stimulate their child's cognitive, fine-motor, gross motor, and language development using everyday household items such as teaspoons, tumblers, and face cloths. Previous quantitative research shows that children whose parents participated in the programme made measurable developmental gains. 

 

Feedback from parents 

In 2024, Drs Khaliq and Russell, together with Prof Gladys Kigozi-Male, Associate Professor in the UFS Centre for Health Systems Research and Development, received an interdisciplinary grant from the UFS to explore the experiences of parents regarding the DRSP. They engaged 31 parents of children with Down syndrome in individual interviews and focus group discussions. According to Kigozi-Male, findings revealed overwhelmingly positive experiences. Parents reported feeling more capable and more connected with their children. “One parent shared: ‘It [the DRSP] helped me to become closer to her, and to know her better, and to know what she’s capable of … my child can do anything that we wanted her to do …  she’s capable of everything, and that if we follow this programme, she [will] become very strong and capable,” said Prof Kigozi-Male.   

Another parent reflected on the knowledge gained: “… the knowledge that I didn’t have before …  as a mother of a Down syndrome baby – but for any mother …  I have learned so much, and it is what any mother should know …” Parents also noted visible improvements in their children’s development, particularly in muscle strength, crawling and walking with one parent explaining “It really changed a lot …  my child's neck was not okay, so the programme taught us how to train the neck muscle. Even when they started walking or crawling, it really helped a lot …” 

Another parent highlighted how the programme strengthened their confidence as caregivers saying “… I don't think we would have come this far without the programme because it helped us understand my child … Without the programme I don't think he would have been so strong because we wouldn't have known how to help him ...”

The DRSP, explains Dr Russell, is just one example of what can happen when parents are treated as active partners rather than passive recipients of care. Going forward, it is important that parents' voices continue to shape how interventions are designed and delivered. Their lived experiences are powerful sources of knowledge on what works in real settings.  

“As we commemorate Down Syndrome Awareness Day, let's remember that inclusion begins with understanding, and understanding grows when we listen to families, parents, and children who remind us that every life matters,” concluded Dr Khaliq. 

News Archive

Reaction by the Rector of the UFS after a meeting with student leaders
2008-02-25

Reaction by the Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS, Prof. Frederick Fourie, on the agreement reached at a meeting with student leaders held on Friday, 22 February 2008

Note: This is meant to be used together with the full joint statement that was issued by the UFS management and student leaders on 22 February 2008.

The memorandum of the primes of the University of the Free State’s (UFS) residences was handed to top management on Wednesday, 20 February 2008. In the memorandum they asked for a meeting with the UFS management by Friday, 22 February 2008. Such a meeting was arranged and took place.

The UFS top management, all the residence primes as well as the house committee member for first years, the executive of the Main Campus Student Representative Council (SRC) and residence heads were present.

In contrast to what is suggested in the Volksblad report of Saturday, the discussion went off very well. There was no consternation or shouting or “emotions that ran high”. It was a civilised, decent meeting as it should be at a good university. Of course, now and again individuals spoke out strongly and very enthusiastically, but it was all decent and orderly. The contribution of the primes was insightful and well formulated.

Because the top management and I wanted to listen very carefully what the problems and frustrations were, we spent nearly five hours in the meeting. The issues in the memorandum were discussed one by one. In some cases I could take a decision immediately and finalise the matter, in other cases, the management provided information that could largely finalise a matter. A number of other matters must be investigated further.

The management undertook to respond comprehensively and in writing to all the issues raised in the memorandum by Monday, 25 February 2008. This will be handed to the primes but will not be handed to the media beforehand.
It is obvious that there are matters at the university that can be better managed and that there are problems with communication within the Student Affairs division. A major change such as the new policy on diversity places huge demands on management and the administration, and problems were to be expected. However, we understand the frustration of the students in residences.

On the other hand, students don’t always make matters easier. The strong opposition of white student leaders last year, and their unwillingness to co-operate in preparation for 2008 is well known. This year it is going better. But often student leaders take positions that are very inflexible. They also see no room for adapting old habits and simply want their own way. Their contributions are then full of statements such as “It cannot be done”. This delays measures such as the full implementation of expert interpreting services, which, for the management, is a very important measure (and which is functioning very well in certain residences). Communication from student leaders to management is also not always what it should be.

At the end of the meeting student leaders and management reached an important agreement and issued a joint statement in which they committed themselves to the integration process and to good co-operation and communication. This was an important step which is a sign of rebuilding trust. Naturally everyone will still have to work hard to build on this and to strengthen mutual trust.

The course and outcome of Friday’s discussions, as requested by the student leaders, show that issues can be addressed and resolved by means of us talking to one another. This is why it is so sad that primes and house committee members went on strike on Wednesday already and stayed in tents in front of the Main Building – leaving their residences without its leadership. This created an opening for what appears to have been well planned and co-ordinated acts of vandalism by inhabitants of residences on the campus on Wednesday.

Such vandalism is unacceptable and no one can justify it.

Fortunately, order could be restored quickly during the night and all academic activities could resume without any disruption on Thursday and Friday.

FCvN Fourie

Media Release
Issued by: Lacea Loader
Assistant Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2584
Cell: 083 645 2454
E-mail: loaderl.stg@ufs.ac.za   
24 February 2008

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept