Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
31 October 2025 | Story Martinette Brits | Photo Supplied
ASSAf
Prof Carlien Pohl-Albertyn (left) and Prof Serges Kamga from the University of the Free State have been elected to the Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf), recognising their excellence in research and academic leadership.

Two University of the Free State (UFS) academics have been elected to the Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf), joining the ranks of the nation’s most distinguished scholars. Prof Serges Kamga, Dean of the Faculty of Law, and Prof Carlien Pohl-Albertyn, NRF-SARChI Research Chair in Pathogenic Yeasts and Professor of Microbiology, were recently recognised for their outstanding contributions to research, scholarship, and the advancement of knowledge.

In addition, Dr Mutshidzi Mulondo, an academic in the Division of Public Health within the Faculty of Health Sciences who recently made history as the first academic from the UFS to be inaugurated to the prestigious Global Young Academy – a network institution of the United Nations Scientific Advisory Board – was selected to the South African Young Academy of Science (SAYAS) as one of the top young scholars recognised for engaged scholarship and scientific contribution. SAYAS provides early-career researchers with a platform to influence science, policy and innovation across South Africa and the continent.

Prof Vasu Reddy, Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Research, Innovation and Postgraduate Studies, who is also a member of the academy and a member of the ASSAf Council, says: “Membership in the Academy of Science of South Africa is a hallmark of scholarly distinction. It is to be entrusted with the stewardship of knowledge. More than this, it is an affirmation that one’s work resonates nationally and globally in advancing knowledge for societal good.”

 

Celebrating UFS excellence

Since its inauguration in 1996 by former President Nelson Mandela, ASSAf has championed the use of science for the benefit of society. Its mandate spans all fields of scientific enquiry, promoting scholarly excellence, evidence-based solutions to national challenges, and international collaboration. With these recent elections, 23 UFS staff members now hold membership of ASSAf, reflecting the university’s growing national and global research impact.

SAYAS, established under ASSAf, empowers young scientists to shape scientific dialogue, influence policy, and tackle pressing societal challenges. Its mission is to create a vibrant community of early-career researchers driving innovation, education, and sustainable development.

Prof Reddy also remarks: “ASSAf and SAYAS are platforms where excellence meets responsibility, purpose, and service. It is, in fact, a call to shape the scientific imagination of the nation, to mentor with purpose, and to lead with intellectual generosity. My heartfelt congratulations to our colleagues who have received recognition from the academy. You make the UFS proud.”

 

Prof Serges Kamga: Human rights and inclusive development

For Prof Serges Kamga, being elected to ASSAf is both an honour and a validation of his lifelong commitment to the advancement of human rights and social justice. “My election demonstrates that I am on the right track in terms of scientific knowledge and activity to remove barriers between people and obstacles to full development of their intellectual capacity,” he says.

His research focuses on the human right to development, socio-economic inclusion, and equality, particularly for vulnerable groups such as persons with disabilities. “I rely on scientific evidence to stress the need to build an equalitarian world, a world without barriers to the full development of human potential,” he explains. Personal experience in witnessing poverty and underdevelopment across Africa inspired him to ask: “If development is a human right inherent to all, why are we poor in Africa? Who pulls the strings of poverty nationally and globally, and why?”

Prof Kamga intends to use his ASSAf membership to strengthen interdisciplinary collaboration and foster responsible societal futures. “My engagement with colleagues will seek ways to break down artificial barriers between disciplines, institutions, and sectors to foster groundbreaking discoveries at the intersection of fields. Modern lawyers should bridge the gap between theory and practice to ensure relevance to their environments.” He also hopes to guide the next generation of legal scholars to combine strong theoretical foundations with practical relevance: “They should connect across disciplines, generate new knowledge, and advance innovative, sustainable solutions to society’s contemporary and future challenges.”

 

Prof Carlien Pohl-Albertyn: Exploring the frontiers of fungal biology

Prof Carlien Pohl-Albertyn describes her election as “a meaningful recognition of my contributions to the national research landscape”. Her research investigates bioactive lipids in pathogenic fungi, focusing on molecules such as oxylipins and prostaglandins that influence fungal virulence and host-pathogen interactions. “By exploring these pathways, I hope to uncover novel targets for antifungal therapies, especially in the context of rising antifungal resistance,” she says. Her work has already shown how polyunsaturated and marine-derived fatty acids can inhibit biofilm formation, a key virulence factor, in Candida species.

Her research also has public health significance through the South African Fryer Oil Initiative (SAFOI), which monitors the quality of frying oils nationwide. “My research on fungal lipids and edible oils is connected by a central theme: understanding how lipids influence health, whether through microbial pathogenicity or human nutrition,” she explains.

Mentorship is equally central to her work. “I foster collaboration and encourage open exchange of ideas, with shared credit and authorship as a non-negotiable principle. Students are supported to publish in reputable journals and present at both local and international conferences, and I actively connect them with global collaborators to help them see themselves as equals on the international stage. Over the years, I have had the privilege of mentoring a diverse group of students and postdocs (many of them first-generation scholars) who have gone on to lead in academia, industry, and government. Our current group reflects a rich diversity of cultures, languages, and identities, and I am committed to continuing the tradition of care and excellence that was instilled in me by my own mentors.”

Prof Pohl-Albertyn is optimistic about future discoveries in her field. “Advances in lipidomics and systems biology are allowing us to study bioactive lipids with increasing precision. Understanding how fungi adapt their lipid pathways in response to environmental pressures, such as climate change or antimicrobial exposure, could reveal new strategies to combat fungal infections and predict emerging pathogens.” She also hopes to use her ASSAf platform to advocate for greater awareness and investment in fungal disease research and to promote equitable access to research funding for African scientists.

 

Dr Mutshidzi Mulondo: Public mental health in a digital age

Dr Mutshidzi Mulondo’s research focuses on mental health, particularly the implementation of digital strategies for public mental health. Mental health, a silent pandemic of our generation, continues to receive limited attention. “My current research looks at digital public mental health strategies, allowing for holistic care and support, particularly in lower- and middle-income countries.” This research is an effort to advance public health strategies that prioritise mental health and health equity.

Dr Mulondo sees the academy as a platform to influence national scientific dialogue and shape policy through emerging efforts such as science diplomacy. “This opportunity allows me to impact policies, specifically in public health, for the betterment of people’s lives. Young scientists need more opportunities to interact with established scientists for intergenerational collaboration. This platform provides young scientists with mentorship as future national and global leaders. Furthermore, the platform provides young scientists with access to other leading scholars for interdisciplinary collaboration to address some of the wicked challenges of our generation.” 

Through SAYAS, Dr Mulondo hopes to contribute to programmes that support the growth of young scientists, increase public understanding of science, and foster sustainable development. “I look forward to participating in these efforts to better place our nation and continent.”

 

A growing legacy of scholarship

The election of Prof Kamga, Prof Pohl-Albertyn, and Dr Mulondo underscores the UFS’ commitment to nurturing excellence across disciplines – from law and the humanities to microbiology and public health. Through the work of ASSAf and SAYAS members, the UFS continues to shape the scientific and academic landscape of South Africa, supporting a vibrant, inclusive, and forward-looking research community. Prof Reddy also emphasises that “recognition by a national academy is a powerful endorsement of one’s scholarly journey. It signals that your voice matters in shaping the intellectual, innovation, and developmental landscape as we aspire to create responsible societal futures”.

News Archive

Bloemfontein's quality of tap water compares very favourably with bottled water
2009-08-04

The quality of the drinking water of five suburbs in Bloemfontein is at least as good as or better than bottled water. This is the result of a standard and chemical bacterial analysis done by the University of the Free State’s (UFS) Centre for Environmental Management in collaboration with the Institute for Groundwater Studies (IGS).

Five samples were taken from tap water sources in the suburbs of Universitas, Brandwag, Bain’s Vlei, Langenhoven Park and Bayswater and 15 samples were taken of different brands of still and unflavoured bottled water. The samples were analysed at the laboratory of the IGS, while the interpretation of the analysis was done by the Centre for Environmental Management.

“We wanted to evaluate the difference in quality for human consumption between tap water and that of the different brands of bottled water,” said Prof. Maitland Seaman, Head of the Centre for Environmental Management.

“With the exception of two samples produced by multinational companies at their plants in South Africa, the different brands of bottled water used for the study were produced by South African companies, including a local small-scale Bloemfontein producer,” said Prof. Seaman.

According to the labels, the sources of the water vary from pure spring water, to partial reverse osmosis (as an aid to standardise salt, i.e. mineral, content), to only reverse osmosis (to remove salts). (Reverse osmosis is a process in which water is forced under pressure through a pipe with minute pores through which water passes but no – or very low concentrations of – salts pass.)

According to Prof. Seaman, the analysis revealed some interesting findings, such as:

• It is generally accepted that drinking water should have an acceptable level of salt content, as the body needs salts. Most mineral contents were relatively higher in the tap water samples than the bottled water samples and were very much within the acceptable range of drinkable water quality. One of the bottled samples, however, had a very low mineral content, as the water was produced by reverse osmosis, as stated on the bottle. While reverse osmosis is used by various producers, most producers use it as an aid, not as a single method to remove nearly all the salts. Drinking only such water over a prolonged period may probably have a negative effect on the human physiology.

• The pH values of the tap water samples (8,12–8,40) were found to be slightly higher (slightly alkaline), like in all south-eastern Free State rivers (from where the water is sourced) than the pH of most of the bottled water samples, most of which are sourced and/or treated in other areas. Two brands of bottled water were found to have relatively low pH levels (both 4,5, i.e. acidic) as indicated on their bottles and as confirmed by the IGS analysis. The health implication of this range of pH is not significant.

• The analysis showed differences in the mineral content given on the labels of most of the water bottles compared to that found by IGS analysis. The possibility of seasonal fluctuation in content, depending on various factors, is expected and most of the bottling companies also indicate this on their labels. What was a rather interesting finding was that two pairs of bottled water brands claimed exactly the same mineral content but appeared under different brand names and were also priced differently. In each case, one of the pair was a well-known house brand, and the other obviously the original producer. In one of these paired cases, the house brand stated that the water was spring water, while the other (identical) “original” brand stated that it was spring water treated by reverse osmosis and oxygen-enriched.

• Nitrate (NO3) levels were uniformly low except in one bottled sample, suggesting a low (non-threatening) level of organic pollution in the source water. Otherwise, none of the water showed any sign of pollution.

• The bacterial analysis confirmed the absence of any traces of coliforms or E.coli in any of the samples, as was also indicated by the bottling companies. This is very reassuring. What is not known is how all these waters were sterilised, which could be anything from irradiation to chlorine or ozone treatment.

• The price of the different brands of bottled water, each containing 500 ml of still water, ranged between R3,99 and R8,99, with R5,03 being the average price. A comparison between the least expensive and the most expensive bottles of water indicated no significant difference in quality. In fact, discrepancies were observed in the most expensive bottle in that the amount of Calcium (Ca) claimed to be present in it was found to be significantly different from what the analysis indicated (29,6 mg/l versus 0,92 mg/l). The alkalinity (CaCO3 mg/l) indicated on the bottle was also found to differ considerably (83 mg/l versus 9,4 mg/l). The concentration of Total Dissolved Salts (TDS) was not given on the product.

“The preference for bottled water as compared to Bloemfontein’s tap water from a qualitative perspective as well as the price discrepancy is unjustifiable. The environmental footprint of bottled water is also large. Sourcing, treating, bottling, packaging and transporting, to mention but a few of the steps involved in the processing of bottled water, entail a huge carbon footprint, as well as a large water footprint, because it also requires water for treating and rinsing to process bottled water,” said Prof. Seaman.

Media Release
Lacea Loader
Deputy Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2584
Cell: 083 645 2454
E-mail: loaderl.stg@ufs.ac.za  
3 August 2009

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept