Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
15 February 2021 | Story Supplied | Photo Supplied
Dr João Vidal is a research fellow at the Department of Plant Sciences and the Afromontane Research Unit (ARU) at the University of the Free State (UFS).

According to United Nations data projections for 2100, sub-Saharan Africa is set to experience a demographic explosion. The most rapid population growth zones in Africa are in or around mountains and the importance of managing these mountain ecosystems sustainably in order to maintain the benefits to such a growing population is critical, says Dr João Vidal, a research fellow at the Department of Plant Sciences and the Afromontane Research Unit (ARU) at the University of the Free State (UFS). 

The link between human population growth and the demand for water will impact these mountain grasslands. All of Africa’s important rivers originate in mountainous areas. The sustainable management of African mountain landscapes is thus vital for the sustained provision of quality water in suitable quantities. “Water is already limited in some places. This year we are facing another drought in South Africa, and if it was not for the mountains, it could have been much worse. The long-term resilience of Southern Africa’s mountains and their ecosystem services should be an absolute priority for both research and conservation,” says Dr Vidal.

Human population growth has several implications

As a mountain ecologist, his recent research is centred on developing indicators for monitoring biodiversity change in Southern Africa’s mountains. This is a collaborative research project with the South African Environmental Observation Network (SAEON), Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, and the University of Pretoria.

Human population growth, as predicted for Southern Africa, has several implications for natural-resource management and biodiversity conservation. “Southern Africa has one of the highest proportions of grassland-dominated mountains in the world, comparable only to Central Asia,” says Dr Vidal. 

In December, UN Secretary-General António Guterres said during the launch of the 2021 Global Humanitarian Overview: “Conflict, climate change and COVID-19 have created the greatest humanitarian challenge since the Second World War. The number of people at risk of starvation has doubled. Hundreds of millions of children are out of school. Levels of extreme poverty have risen for the first time in 22 years.”

According to Dr Vidal this new scenario significantly increases the pressure on mountain environments and their biota, since people will have to find alternative ways of feeding their families, their animals, while the economy struggles to recover globally.

Through his research, Dr Vidal – together with a growing community of practices for Southern Africa’s mountains – aims to understand the socio-ecological functioning of these montane grasslands in order to encourage a science-policy-action interface for their sustainable management in a changing world. 


Alternative ways for measuring environmental change in mountains

Since much global mountain research is focused on forest-dominated mountains, Dr Vidal and his collaborators are developing specific tools to track climate change in grassy mountains.
He explains: “When you look at the available tools for tracking climate change in mountains, you have a tree line for many mountains in the world. However, with the Southern African grassy mountains, it is impossible to use such a tool. We are working on alternative ways for measuring environmental change in our mountains.

“As it gets warmer, certain communities of grasses may retract towards higher elevations because they need a certain minimum temperature to survive. The problem seems to be that current climate change is occurring at a much faster rate than most species might be able to retract. This means that higher temperatures may lead to habitat losses for temperature-vulnerable groups.

“Climate change is also making mountains increasingly vulnerable to ecological invasion by non-native species. The severe temperatures in mountains are a good barrier for many problematic lowland species. But with warmer temperatures in the mountains, these barriers are being weakened, increasing the number of potentially invasive plants in our mountains. With higher temperatures there is potential for a large guild of invasive trees to overrun grassland mountains affecting waterflow into dams and rivers. Examples are pines, willows, gums, and wattles, to name a few.

“The presence of invasive trees, especially along rivers, has long-term negative impacts on the functioning of mountain catchments. These trees destabilise riverbanks, extract large amounts of water, and cause local extinction of endemic montane biodiversity. In drier environments such as grasslands, this exacerbates the fragile water productivity,” he adds.

Global policymakers to recognise the value of grassy mountains 

It is important to draw attention to the value of natural grassy mountain systems around the world and to how threatened they are. The world’s grassy mountains need to be better studied and better placed on the global stage. This will encourage policy makers to recognise these systems and implement appropriate measures to facilitate their sustainable management. 

For the first time in 20 years, the recent International Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) report to the United Nations included a chapter focusing solely on mountains. “Policymakers are finally realising how disproportionately important mountain environments are and how dramatically they are affected by climate change,” says Dr Vidal. 

However, African mountains are underrepresented in research literature; it is the only continent for which there is no data included in the IPCC report. There is an urgent need to represent African mountains – especially Southern Africa’s mountains – on the global stage when it comes to climate change,” states Dr Vidal.

Dr Vidal is conducting this study in partnership with Dr Ralph Clark, Director of the ARU on the UFS Qwaqwa Campus

News Archive

UV belê in gehalte met strategiese fokusgroepe - Volksblad
2006-02-09

Verslaggewer
DIE Universiteit van die Vrystaat (UV) gaan vanjaar R10 miljoen beskikbaar stel om sekere van sy akademiese en navorsingsaktiwiteite in strategiese fokusgroepe te bedryf.

 

Volgens prof. Frederick Fourie, rektor en visekanselier van die UV, is hierdie ’n belegging in gehalte wat sal help om die UV nasionaal en internasionaal van ander universiteite in die wêreld te onderskei.

Tydens die amptelike opening van die UV verlede week het Fourie beklemtoon dat die strategiese fokusgroepe veel meer behels as net ’n herorganisering van gevestigde navorsingsgebiede.

“Sulke fokusgroepe behels ’n gefokusde deskundigheidsgebied en nie slegs navorsing nie, maar ook sterk voorgraadse en veral nagraadse onderrig en ’n potensieel sterk wetenskaplike grondslag vir samelewingsdiens.

“Strategiese fokusgroepe sal georganiseer word op die grondslag dat hierdie kennisgebiede op kort termyn die vlagskepe van die UV kan word. Dit beteken dat hierdie die gebiede is waarin die UV nou of in die toekoms waarskynlik ’n kompeterende voorsprong sal hê.”
Hy het gesê dit is belangrik dat die UV hom in die volgende fase van sy ontwikkeling posisioneer, nie net as ’n goeie onderrig- en navorsingsuniversiteit nie, maar ook as ’n universiteit wat in strategies belangrike kennisgebiede uitblink. Dit is noodsaaklik om energie en hulpbronne so te rig.

Nie alle akademiese en navorsingsaktiwiteite gaan egter hierdeur geraak word nie. ’n Breë ondersteuningsgrondslag is die afgelope paar jaar geskep vir uitnemende navorsing deur alle akademiese personeellede in hul eie navorsingsgebiede. Dié inisiatief sal naas die nuwe fokusgroepinisiatief steeds voortgaan.

Fourie sê die strategiese fokusgroepbenadering sal in lyn wees met die benadering wat ontwerp word deur die Nasionale Navorsingsraad (NNR) om nasionale prioriteite in berekening te bring. Breedweg is die vyf strategiese gebiede vir die UV voorlopig die volgende:
1. Voedselproduksie, voedselgehalte en voedselsekuriteit vir Afrika.
2. Ontwikkeling en streeksontwikkeling binne die Afrika-konteks.
3. Maatskaplike transformasie binne die Suider-Afrikaanse en Afrika-konteks.
4. Waterhulpbron- en ekostelselbestuur.
5. Tegnologie vir die toekoms. (’n Aparte fokusgroep rakende die chemiese nywerheid kan dalk bepaal word).

“Binne elk van hierdie gebiede kan ’n aantal nisgebiede geïdentifiseer word. Die fokusgebiede dek sowel die geestes- as die natuurwetenskappe, maar uiteraard kan en moet dit nie alles vir almal probeer wees nie,” sê Fourie.

Die presiese formulering en inhoud van die fokus- en nisgebiede sal nog bepaal word tydens gesprekke op die kampus. Dit sal met die hulp van kundiges buite die UV geskied.
Hy sê dit het sin dat ’n mediumgrootte universiteit soos die UV sy menslike hulpbronne, infrastruktuur, finansiële hulpbronne en intellektuele kundigheid sal konsentreer om te verseker dat ’n bydrae gelewer word tot Bloemfontein, die Vrystaat, die land en die Afrika-vasteland.

Hy sê van die uitvloeisels kan ’n belangrike impak op nywerheidsontwikkeling hê, byvoorbeeld in die chemiese bedryf, en dit mag ook ’n grondslag skep vir samewerking met provinsiale, nasionale en internasionale vennote.

Behalwe die R10 miljoen vir die vestiging van die fokusgroepe is daar die afgelope paar jaar groot bedrae beskikbaar gestel vir talle projekte om gehalte in onderrig en leer, in navorsing en ander gebiede te verbeter.

Berig verskyn in Volksblad - Dinsdag, 7 Februarie 2006

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept