Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
23 August 2022 | Story André Damons | Photo Supplied
Dr Walter Janse van Rensburg
Dr Walter Janse van Rensburg, Senior Lecturer in the Human Molecular Biology Unit, Department of Haematology and Cell Biology in the UFS School of Biomedical Sciences, says new research found that men of European descent over the age of 50 are the most vulnerable for the development of atherosclerosis.

A new study by researchers in the Human Molecular Biology Unit in the School of Biomedical Sciences at the University of the Free State (UFS) into atherosclerosis in the South African population found that men of European descent over the age of 50 are the most vulnerable for the development of atherosclerosis – the most common disorder associated with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Nearly half of men in this group had visible signs of atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries of the heart. 

This was in contrast to the only roughly one-tenth of the African-descent males and females in the same age bracket. More than a third of women of European descent over 50 had visible atherosclerosis in their coronary arteries. One hypothesis regarding a possible explanation for this discrepancy is based on the theory that socioeconomic status may be a driving force behind CVD.

Risks factor for cardiovascular diseases

Dr Walter Janse van Rensburg, Senior Lecturer in the Human Molecular Biology Unit at the School of Biomedical Sciences, UFS, and principal researcher, says the study was conceptualised during 2020s COVID-19 pandemic, due to reports of excessive blood clots associated with both acute COVID-19 infection and some of the SARS-CoV2 vaccines. However, limited data existed in our region regarding the other underlying causes for blood clot formation, such as atherosclerotic plaque rupture. The data was collected during a couple of months in 2021. The data was collected out of more than 10,000 case files spanning 10 years. The study is still ongoing.

“Atherosclerosis remains a major risk factor for CVD, and thus, believed to be a good indicator of the CVD profile in a population, yet little is known on its prevalence in sub-Saharan African populations. We aimed to determine the prevalence of atherosclerosis in a diverse South African population as found in post-mortem investigations. A retrospective file audit was done on 10,240 forensic post-mortem reports done at a forensic pathology mortuary in South Africa, over 10 years,” writes Dr Janse van Rensburg in the Abstract of the research article. 

According to him, cardiovascular diseases are reportedly the No 1 cause of mortality worldwide. According to the latest report from Stats SA, diseases of the circulatory system account for nearly a fifth of all deaths in South Africa.
“CVD is a multifactorial disorder, however, the presence of atherosclerosis (an inflammatory condition of artery walls) is the most common disorder associated with CVD. In order to assist in the prevention of the formation and progression of atherosclerosis, one can manage factors that have been associated with a higher risk for atherosclerosis, such as the use of tobacco, hypertension, elevated cholesterol, obesity, HIV infection and diabetes,” says Dr Janse van Rensburg.

Reasons behind different population’s mortality rate

It has been proposed, says Dr Janse van Rensburg, that socioeconomic status is possibly one of the essential roleplayers in CVD aetiology. The socioeconomic inequality in South Africa is well known, with an economic inequality Gini coefficient of 0.63 (the highest in the world). One study reported that in the Free State province, in the non-agricultural sector, the average household income for a European-descent household is roughly 4.35-times higher than the average African-descent household income. 

“Therefore, it is postulated that wealthier people, in the South African context, historically people of European descent, have the means to afford and adopt lifestyles that contribute to the increased risk of lifestyle diseases such as obesity, hypercholesterolaemia and diabetes, which are associated with a higher risk to develop CVD.

“We postulate that CVD-related deaths are traditionally lower among South Africans of African descent compared to the other ethnic populations due to the historical socioeconomic discrepancy between people of African descent and other population groups in higher-income countries.”

The study also found that the prevalence of CVDs and the incidence of premature CVD-related deaths are steadily increasing in both rural and urban communities and across the socioeconomic spectrum. The theory of epidemiological transition says that in populations with improved living conditions and better access to healthcare, the proportion of deaths caused by infectious diseases will decrease, and the proportion of deaths due to more chronic “man-made” lifestyle-related diseases, such as CVD, will increase.

However, our population’s socioeconomic status is not the only driving force behind CVD. Therefore, we theorise there has been an upward trend in South Africa across all regions to improve the access to better food and better healthcare, consequently resulting in an increase in CVD-related morbidity and mortality statistics.

“For all population groups, males are more affected than females within their demographic group. This may also be possibly attributed to the socioeconomic status and access to the healthcare gender-gap differential in the country.”

Studies are vital in raising public awareness

Dr Janse van Rensburg says that studies such as this are vital in raising public awareness regarding disorders associated with the lifestyle choices people make. However, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to ultimately create a lasting impact. 

“We hope that our findings will assist in identifying specific groups with a possible increased risk for CVD, and that we will inspire more focused research to identify potential high-risk behaviours within these groups that may eventually result in the enhancement of public health policies and awareness campaigns in our region.

“Recently, another article has been accepted for publication regarding the prevalence of excessive blood clots (thrombosis) as the underlying cause of death in our study cohort, further contributing to our understanding of the origins and contributory factors of CVDs in our region.”

News Archive

Open letter from Prof Jonathan Jansen to all UFS students
2014-02-22

Dear Students of the University of the Free State

In the past four years there has emerged a new consensus on the three campuses of the University of the Free State (UFS) about the things that divide us – such as racism, sexism and homophobia. Students and campus leaders have worked hard to develop this new consensus in residences and in the open spaces on campus. There can be no doubt that new bonds of friendship have developed across the markers of race, ethnicity, class, religion and sexual orientation. I bear witness to these new solidarities every day on the campus.

You chose a white student to head up the transformation portfolio on the SRC. You chose a black captain to head up the university’s first team in rugby. You chose a white “prime” as head of residence to lead a predominantly black men’s residence. You chose a South African woman of Indian descent as Rag Queen and last week, a black student from Cape Town as the men’s Rag winner—choices not possible and never made before in our campus history. Many of you have intimate friends who come from different social or cultural or religious backgrounds. You learn together, share rooms together, pray together and party together. In other words, in the day to day workings of this university campus, you have demonstrated to campus, city and country that we can overcome the lingering effects of racism and other maladies in this new generation. You have helped create a university community inclusive of people of diverse religions, abilities, class and sexual orientation.

I have said this repeatedly that from time to time this new consensus will be tested – when a minority of students, and they are a small and dwindling minority, still act as if these are the days of apartheid. And when that consensus is tested as it was this week, and as it will be tested in the future, only then we will be able to assess the strength and durability of our progress in creating a new South African campus culture of human togetherness based on respect, dignity and embrace.

The real test of our leadership, including student leadership, is how we respond when our transformation drive is threatened.

Let me say this: I have absolute faith in you, as students of this great university, to stand together in your condemnation of these vile acts of violence and to move together in your determination to maintain the momentum for the Human Project of the University of the Free State. We have come too far to allow a few criminals to derail what you have built together in recent years.

There will, no doubt, be unscrupulous people on all sides of the political spectrum wanting to milk this tragedy for their own narrow purposes. There will be false information, rumours and exaggerations by those who wish to inflame a bad situation to gain mileage for their agendas. That is inevitable in a country that is still so divided.

I ask you, through all of this, to keep perspective. Two or ten or even twenty students behaving badly do not represent 30,000 students; a minority of violent and hateful persons do not represent the ideals, ambitions and commitments of the majority. At the same time, let us be realistic – anyone who thinks you can drive transformation without resistance clearly does not understand the difficult process of change.

The events of the week remind us, however, that we still have a long road to walk in deepening social and academic transformation at our university. Yes, we have invested hundreds of hours in training and mentorship; we have created new structures – such as the Institute for Reconciliation and Social Justice – to capture the energy and imagination of students driving transformation; we have created many opportunities for students to study and travel on this and other continents to enable cross-cultural learning; we have established formal and informal opportunities to dialogue about difficult issues on and off campus between students and their leaders; and we crafted new curricula to enable teaching and learning on the big questions of our times.

But this is clearly not enough, and so I have decided on the following immediate next steps:
  1. We will meet for several hours next week to think about how we can deepen the transformation of our university after this terrible incident.

  2. We will arrange a University Assembly on the events of the past week so that we speak with one voice on human wrongs and to re-commit to human rights and we will continue with open forum discussions during the months to come.

  3. We will review the entire spectrum of programmes, from orientation to residence life to the undergraduate curriculum, to determine how effective our interventions really are in reaching all students with respect to basic issues of human rights.

  4. We will review our media and communications strategy to determine how far and deep our messages on human rights travel across all sectors of the university community. In this regard it is important that the campus be blanketed on a regular basis with our condemnation of human wrongs and our commitment to human rights.

  5. We will commission the Institute for Reconciliation and Social Justice to review the events of the past week and make recommendations on how we can improve the campus environment so that all students are protected from harm inside residences, classrooms and in open spaces of the campus.

  6. We will take the questions raised during this week into the academic community and to the general staff of the university so that all personnel also engage with our own roles and responsibilities with respect to campus transformations.

  7. We undertake to make annual report-backs on transformation to all stakeholders in public forums so that students and staff and external communities can track the progress of the university on matters of human rights on campus.

I wish to thank my staff for acting firmly as soon as this tragic event came to our attention. We worked through the night to find and identify the perpetrators. We traced the two students and immediately handed them to the police. They were expelled. And throughout this process we offered counselling and support to the victim of this violent act.

The two former students were expelled and will now face justice in the criminal courts. It is hoped that in the course of time they will come to their senses and seek restoration and reconciliation with the student they so callously harmed. They are not part of the university community anymore.

That is the kind of university we are.

Jonathan D Jansen
Vice-Chancellor and Rector
University of the Free State
20 February 2014

 
Note: The use of the word ‘campus’ refers to all three campuses of the UFS, namely the Bloemfontein Campus, South Campus and Qwaqwa Campus.

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept