Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
23 August 2022 | Story André Damons | Photo Supplied
Dr Walter Janse van Rensburg
Dr Walter Janse van Rensburg, Senior Lecturer in the Human Molecular Biology Unit, Department of Haematology and Cell Biology in the UFS School of Biomedical Sciences, says new research found that men of European descent over the age of 50 are the most vulnerable for the development of atherosclerosis.

A new study by researchers in the Human Molecular Biology Unit in the School of Biomedical Sciences at the University of the Free State (UFS) into atherosclerosis in the South African population found that men of European descent over the age of 50 are the most vulnerable for the development of atherosclerosis – the most common disorder associated with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Nearly half of men in this group had visible signs of atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries of the heart. 

This was in contrast to the only roughly one-tenth of the African-descent males and females in the same age bracket. More than a third of women of European descent over 50 had visible atherosclerosis in their coronary arteries. One hypothesis regarding a possible explanation for this discrepancy is based on the theory that socioeconomic status may be a driving force behind CVD.

Risks factor for cardiovascular diseases

Dr Walter Janse van Rensburg, Senior Lecturer in the Human Molecular Biology Unit at the School of Biomedical Sciences, UFS, and principal researcher, says the study was conceptualised during 2020s COVID-19 pandemic, due to reports of excessive blood clots associated with both acute COVID-19 infection and some of the SARS-CoV2 vaccines. However, limited data existed in our region regarding the other underlying causes for blood clot formation, such as atherosclerotic plaque rupture. The data was collected during a couple of months in 2021. The data was collected out of more than 10,000 case files spanning 10 years. The study is still ongoing.

“Atherosclerosis remains a major risk factor for CVD, and thus, believed to be a good indicator of the CVD profile in a population, yet little is known on its prevalence in sub-Saharan African populations. We aimed to determine the prevalence of atherosclerosis in a diverse South African population as found in post-mortem investigations. A retrospective file audit was done on 10,240 forensic post-mortem reports done at a forensic pathology mortuary in South Africa, over 10 years,” writes Dr Janse van Rensburg in the Abstract of the research article. 

According to him, cardiovascular diseases are reportedly the No 1 cause of mortality worldwide. According to the latest report from Stats SA, diseases of the circulatory system account for nearly a fifth of all deaths in South Africa.
“CVD is a multifactorial disorder, however, the presence of atherosclerosis (an inflammatory condition of artery walls) is the most common disorder associated with CVD. In order to assist in the prevention of the formation and progression of atherosclerosis, one can manage factors that have been associated with a higher risk for atherosclerosis, such as the use of tobacco, hypertension, elevated cholesterol, obesity, HIV infection and diabetes,” says Dr Janse van Rensburg.

Reasons behind different population’s mortality rate

It has been proposed, says Dr Janse van Rensburg, that socioeconomic status is possibly one of the essential roleplayers in CVD aetiology. The socioeconomic inequality in South Africa is well known, with an economic inequality Gini coefficient of 0.63 (the highest in the world). One study reported that in the Free State province, in the non-agricultural sector, the average household income for a European-descent household is roughly 4.35-times higher than the average African-descent household income. 

“Therefore, it is postulated that wealthier people, in the South African context, historically people of European descent, have the means to afford and adopt lifestyles that contribute to the increased risk of lifestyle diseases such as obesity, hypercholesterolaemia and diabetes, which are associated with a higher risk to develop CVD.

“We postulate that CVD-related deaths are traditionally lower among South Africans of African descent compared to the other ethnic populations due to the historical socioeconomic discrepancy between people of African descent and other population groups in higher-income countries.”

The study also found that the prevalence of CVDs and the incidence of premature CVD-related deaths are steadily increasing in both rural and urban communities and across the socioeconomic spectrum. The theory of epidemiological transition says that in populations with improved living conditions and better access to healthcare, the proportion of deaths caused by infectious diseases will decrease, and the proportion of deaths due to more chronic “man-made” lifestyle-related diseases, such as CVD, will increase.

However, our population’s socioeconomic status is not the only driving force behind CVD. Therefore, we theorise there has been an upward trend in South Africa across all regions to improve the access to better food and better healthcare, consequently resulting in an increase in CVD-related morbidity and mortality statistics.

“For all population groups, males are more affected than females within their demographic group. This may also be possibly attributed to the socioeconomic status and access to the healthcare gender-gap differential in the country.”

Studies are vital in raising public awareness

Dr Janse van Rensburg says that studies such as this are vital in raising public awareness regarding disorders associated with the lifestyle choices people make. However, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to ultimately create a lasting impact. 

“We hope that our findings will assist in identifying specific groups with a possible increased risk for CVD, and that we will inspire more focused research to identify potential high-risk behaviours within these groups that may eventually result in the enhancement of public health policies and awareness campaigns in our region.

“Recently, another article has been accepted for publication regarding the prevalence of excessive blood clots (thrombosis) as the underlying cause of death in our study cohort, further contributing to our understanding of the origins and contributory factors of CVDs in our region.”

News Archive

“To forgive is not an obligation. It’s a choice.” – Prof Minow during Reconciliation Lecture
2014-03-05

“To forgive is not an obligation. It’s a choice.” – Prof Minow during the Third Annual Reconciliation Lecture entitled Forgiveness, Law and Justice.
Photo: Johan Roux

No one could have anticipated the atmosphere in which Prof Martha Minow would visit the Bloemfontein Campus. And no one could have predicted how apt the timing of her message would be. As this formidable Dean of Harvard University’s Law School stepped behind the podium, a latent tension edged through the crowded audience.

“The issue of getting along after conflict is urgent.”

With these few words, Prof Minow exposed the essence of not only her lecture, but also the central concern of the entire university community.

As an expert on issues surrounding racial justice, Prof Minow has worked across the globe in post-conflict societies. How can we prevent atrocities from happening? she asked. Her answer was an honest, “I don’t know.” What she is certain of, on the other hand, is that the usual practice of either silence or retribution does not work. “I think that silence produces rage – understandably – and retribution produces the cycle of violence. Rather than ignoring what happens, rather than retribution, it would be good to reach for something more.” This is where reconciliation comes in.

Prof Minow put forward the idea that forgiveness should accompany reconciliation efforts. She defined forgiveness as a conscious, deliberate decision to forego rightful grounds of resentment towards those who have committed a wrong. “To forgive then, in this definition, is not an obligation. It’s a choice. And it’s held by the one who was harmed,” she explained.

Letting go of resentment cannot be forced – not even by the law. What the law can do, though, is either to encourage or discourage forgiveness. Prof Minow showed how the law can construct adversarial processes that render forgiveness less likely, when indeed its intention was the opposite. “Or, law can give people chances to meet together in spaces where they may apologise and they may forgive,” she continued. This point introduced some surprising revelations about our Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC).

Indeed, studies do report ambivalence, disappointment and mixed views about the TRC. Whatever our views are on its success, Prof Minow reported that people across the world wonder how South African did it. “It may not work entirely inside the country; outside the country it’s had a huge effect. It’s a touchstone for transitional justice.”

The TRC “seems to have coincided with, and maybe contributed to, the relatively peaceful political transition to democracy that is, frankly, an absolute miracle.” What came as a surprise to many is this: the fact that the TRC has affected transitional justice efforts in forty jurisdictions, including Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Cambodia and Liberia. It has even inspired the creation of a TRC in Greensborough, North Carolina, in the United States.

There are no blueprints for solving conflict, though. “But the possibility of something other than criminal trials, something other than war, something other than silence – that’s why the TRC, I think, has been such an exemplar to the world,” she commended.

Court decision cannot rebuild a society, though. Only individuals can forgive. Only individuals can start with purposeful, daily decisions to forgive and forge a common future. Forgiveness is rather like kindness, she suggested. It’s a resource without limits. It’s not scarce like water or money. It’s within our reach. But if it’s forced, it’s not forgiveness.

“It is good,” Prof Minow warned, “to be cautious about the use of law to deliberately shape or manipulate the feelings of any individual. But it is no less important to admit that law does affect human beings, not just in its results, but in its process.” And then we must take responsibility for how we use that law.

“A government can judge, but only people can forgive.” As Prof Minow’s words lingered, the air suddenly seemed a bit more buoyant.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept