Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

Cardiovascular diseases deaths are on the rise in South Africa

23 August 2022 | Story André Damons | Photo Supplied

Dr Walter Janse van Rensburg, Senior Lecturer in the Human Molecular Biology Unit, Department of Haematology and Cell Biology in the UFS School of Biomedical Sciences, says new research found that men of European descent over the age of 50 are the most vulnerable for the development of atherosclerosis.

A new study by researchers in the Human Molecular Biology Unit in the School of Biomedical Sciences at the University of the Free State (UFS) into atherosclerosis in the South African population found that men of European descent over the age of 50 are the most vulnerable for the development of atherosclerosis – the most common disorder associated with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Nearly half of men in this group had visible signs of atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries of the heart.

This was in contrast to the only roughly one-tenth of the African-descent males and females in the same age bracket. More than a third of women of European descent over 50 had visible atherosclerosis in their coronary arteries. One hypothesis regarding a possible explanation for this discrepancy is based on the theory that socioeconomic status may be a driving force behind CVD.

Risks factor for cardiovascular diseases

Dr Walter Janse van Rensburg, Senior Lecturer in the Human Molecular Biology Unit at the School of Biomedical Sciences, UFS, and principal researcher, says the study was conceptualised during 2020s COVID-19 pandemic, due to reports of excessive blood clots associated with both acute COVID-19 infection and some of the SARS-CoV2 vaccines. However, limited data existed in our region regarding the other underlying causes for blood clot formation, such as atherosclerotic plaque rupture. The data was collected during a couple of months in 2021. The data was collected out of more than 10,000 case files spanning 10 years. The study is still ongoing.

“Atherosclerosis remains a major risk factor for CVD, and thus, believed to be a good indicator of the CVD profile in a population, yet little is known on its prevalence in sub-Saharan African populations. We aimed to determine the prevalence of atherosclerosis in a diverse South African population as found in post-mortem investigations. A retrospective file audit was done on 10,240 forensic post-mortem reports done at a forensic pathology mortuary in South Africa, over 10 years,” writes Dr Janse van Rensburg in the Abstract of the research article.

According to him, cardiovascular diseases are reportedly the No 1 cause of mortality worldwide. According to the latest report from Stats SA, diseases of the circulatory system account for nearly a fifth of all deaths in South Africa.

“CVD is a multifactorial disorder, however, the presence of atherosclerosis (an inflammatory condition of artery walls) is the most common disorder associated with CVD. In order to assist in the prevention of the formation and progression of atherosclerosis, one can manage factors that have been associated with a higher risk for atherosclerosis, such as the use of tobacco, hypertension, elevated cholesterol, obesity, HIV infection and diabetes,” says Dr Janse van Rensburg.

Reasons behind different population’s mortality rate

It has been proposed, says Dr Janse van Rensburg, that socioeconomic status is possibly one of the essential roleplayers in CVD aetiology. The socioeconomic inequality in South Africa is well known, with an economic inequality Gini coefficient of 0.63 (the highest in the world). One study reported that in the Free State province, in the non-agricultural sector, the average household income for a European-descent household is roughly 4.35-times higher than the average African-descent household income.

“Therefore, it is postulated that wealthier people, in the South African context, historically people of European descent, have the means to afford and adopt lifestyles that contribute to the increased risk of lifestyle diseases such as obesity, hypercholesterolaemia and diabetes, which are associated with a higher risk to develop CVD.

“We postulate that CVD-related deaths are traditionally lower among South Africans of African descent compared to the other ethnic populations due to the historical socioeconomic discrepancy between people of African descent and other population groups in higher-income countries.”

The study also found that the prevalence of CVDs and the incidence of premature CVD-related deaths are steadily increasing in both rural and urban communities and across the socioeconomic spectrum. The theory of epidemiological transition says that in populations with improved living conditions and better access to healthcare, the proportion of deaths caused by infectious diseases will decrease, and the proportion of deaths due to more chronic “man-made” lifestyle-related diseases, such as CVD, will increase.

However, our population’s socioeconomic status is not the only driving force behind CVD. Therefore, we theorise there has been an upward trend in South Africa across all regions to improve the access to better food and better healthcare, consequently resulting in an increase in CVD-related morbidity and mortality statistics.

“For all population groups, males are more affected than females within their demographic group. This may also be possibly attributed to the socioeconomic status and access to the healthcare gender-gap differential in the country.”

Studies are vital in raising public awareness

Dr Janse van Rensburg says that studies such as this are vital in raising public awareness regarding disorders associated with the lifestyle choices people make. However, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to ultimately create a lasting impact.

“We hope that our findings will assist in identifying specific groups with a possible increased risk for CVD, and that we will inspire more focused research to identify potential high-risk behaviours within these groups that may eventually result in the enhancement of public health policies and awareness campaigns in our region.

“Recently, another article has been accepted for publication regarding the prevalence of excessive blood clots (thrombosis) as the underlying cause of death in our study cohort, further contributing to our understanding of the origins and contributory factors of CVDs in our region.”

News Archive

Questions about racial integration in residences answered

2007-07-31

Answers to frequently asked questions about the racial integration of student residences at the UFS

1. Why does the UFS want to change the current situation in the student residences?

There are many reasons why a new approach to placement in the student residences is necessary. However, the main reason is of an educational nature. As a university, the UFS should create an environment in its residences where students can learn to appreciate and respect the rich diversity that is on offer at the university. A university accommodates students from many different backgrounds in terms of race, language, religion, economic status, culture and other aspects. If a student can learn to appreciate the value in this rich diversity at university, he or she will also be able to appreciate the value of this diversity in the workplace and broader society.

The current situation of predominantly white and predominantly black residences has not been able to cultivate such an appreciation for diversity and respect for one another as human beings, and will not equip students with the knowledge and skills required to manage diversity.

Besides this, there are many other areas of life in the residences that need attention. For one, we need to urgently establish a human rights culture in the residences so that the rights of all students can be respected. We need to address the abuse of alcohol, provide disabled students with their rightful place, and last but not least, really entrench a culture of learning in student residences.

Let us make the residences places we can be proud of – places of learning, of diversity, of respect; places of growth and development. This is the ideal we should all strive to achieve.

2. Why does the management want to force us to integrate?

It is a false argument to debate the issue in terms of “force”. Any decision by a University, or any other organisation, regarding matters of policy, rules and regulations implies a restriction on the choice of an individual and an obligation to comply. What we should focus on is whether this decision of the Council is in the best interests of our students.

The management of the university believes that it has a responsibility to give students the best education possible, not only in terms of what you learn in the lecture rooms, but especially in the residences as well. The residences can be very powerful places of learning about matters of great importance, both academic and non-academic.

The parallel-medium language policy separates students into largely white/Afrikaans and black/English classes. Efforts are being made to bridge this divide in the classroom, but we can also try to eliminate it in the residences.

The university is committed to building a new culture for the entire institution that is based on values and principles – such as an academic culture, non-racialism, respect for human rights and diversity – among staff and students.

In the context of student residences, the application of these values and principles still allows substantial room for the voluntary exercising of choice by individuals as well as by Residence Committees, notably with regard to the placement of students (they can still place 50 percent of first-year students), as well as the determination of the future character and traditions of a diverse residence.

Furthermore, students can still choose their residences (subject to availability of places), can choose a roommate, and so forth.

3. What about freedom of association?

The rights we enjoy in a democracy must be balanced against other rights, as well as the laws of the country. This means that the right to freedom of association must be balanced against laws that make it illegal to discriminate against other people on the basis of race, language or religion, for instance.

Freedom of association pertains to the right of individuals to form voluntary organisations such as clubs or private boarding houses, or their right to join or not join existing organisations. You exercise that right when you decide to become a student of the UFS, and again when you choose to live in one of its residences.

However, once you have decided to join an organisation voluntarily, you cannot subsequently demand that that organisation should provide a “club” or residence to your liking where, for instance, you only associate with your choice of co-members. You must accept the policies of that organisation.

In any case, how would that right of yours be balanced against the right of another individual who wishes to associate with a different set of co-members? (For instance – what about the freedom of a student to associate with students NOT from his own background, but indeed from another language, cultural, racial or economic background?)

The constitutional right to freedom of association can, in any case, not be used to exclude or discriminate on the basis of race or religion (Section 18 of the Bill of Rights).

Besides, the new policy guidelines will still make provision for freedom of association. This right can be exercised freely within a diverse residence with regard to friendships, joint academic work, socialising, sport, etc.

4. Will residences not lose their traditions?

The University appreciates that there are many valuable elements of tradition in residences. However, we must bear in mind that the traditions and character of student residences have evolved and changed over time, and they will continue to evolve and to change. In addition, we do not need to accept all aspects of residence life purely on the basis of tradition, including the unacceptably high level of alcohol abuse and unsavoury, humiliating and discriminatory orientation practices. The new approach to integrated residences provides the opportunity to retain the positive aspects of the current traditions and character, but also to develop new traditions and give residences a new character.

We can now establish a tradition and a character for each residence that are reconcilable with the values of the University as a place of scholarship and are aligned with the human rights approach of our country’s Constitution, the laws of our country and the strengths and diversity of the students in a particular residence.

5. Have students been involved in this process? Is there a role for them to play after the decision has been taken by the Council of the UFS?

In the first semester of 2007, during two rounds of consultations, the primes, SRC and student organisations were consulted about the proposed new placement policy to increase diversity in residences. Some residences also made written submissions on the matter (such as Madelief, Soetdoring, Wag-'n-bietjie, Vergeet-my-nie, Emily Hobhouse). Other residences requested and were granted more time, but did not make any submissions in the end (such as Reitz and Armentum).

Management also had several meetings with the above-mentioned structures to hear first-hand from students their concerns and solutions regarding possible challenges presented by integration in residences.

During these interactions, several excellent ideas and proposals were put forward by students. These views had a definite impact on the eventual proposal that was taken to the University Council, in particular regarding the minimum level of diversity (30%) in junior residences and the fact that residences still want to have a say in the placement of students, rather than the placement decision being left in the hands of Management alone (hence the 50% placement portion of residences). Management values the effort that was put into the process by the primes and residence committees, and thanks them for their contributions.

However, it should be stressed that consultation should not be understood as a process of negotiation, nor does it imply that consensus must be reached. What it means is that Management must take a considered decision after hearing the views of stakeholders.

Management would like students to continue to provide input and ideas regarding the implementation details of the policy guidelines. Task teams have been established and students will be informed about how they can interact with the task teams on an ongoing basis.

6. But integration in the residences was tried in the past (in the late 1990s), and then it failed. Why will it work now?

Yes, the University of the Free State did integrate its residences as far back as 1993, and for a few years it worked. The UFS did it at that time and is now doing so again, because it is the right thing to do. Yet it is important to understand why the previous attempt at racial integration in residences was not successful.

Firstly, both black and white students were much polarised because of the apartheid past. Secondly, there was insufficient management support for students in the residences, the student leaders generally as well as residence heads, in terms of dealing with diversity and related issues. Thirdly, the institutional culture of the UFS and the residences in particular was not addressed as part of broader transformation and integration in residences, whereas it is now being addressed.

In addition, the current decision to integrate residences has the benefit of being implemented after several more years of integration in schooling, sport, workplaces and other aspects of life.

This decision is also based on Management’s commitment to give all the possible support it can to this process.

This is a very important initiative that the UFS is undertaking. Management, in co-operation with students, must ensure that it succeeds. Integrated residences that produce high-quality graduates equipped to deal with the challenges of the workplace and our society is a worthwhile ideal we should all strive to achieve.

If you would like to make a proposal regarding the implementation and practical aspects of the new policy, please send it to the following email address: rector@ufs.ac.za

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept