Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

Green Engineering: How UFS’s Green concrete can be an alternative to OPC cement

29 November 2022 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Leonie Bolleurs

UFS green concrete — The Department of Engineering Sciences (EnSci) welcomes collaborations with other departments at the UFS. Pictured here are, from the left: Louis Lagrange, Head of EnSci, Prof Kahilu Kajimo-Shakantu, Head of the Department of Quantity Surveying and Construction Management, Dr Abdolhossein Naghizadeh, and Megan Welman-Purchase, analytical scientist in the Department of Geology.

More than 30 million tonnes of fly ash (residue from coal combustion in power plants) are generated in South Africa annually, with 96% of that being disposed of in landfills. There is thus more than enough of this key ingredient to produce green concrete.

Green concrete, so called due to its environmentally friendly benefits, is an eco-friendly alternative to conventional concrete based on the Portland cement binder. During the production of green concrete, less carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere than with the production of ordinary Portland cement (OPC). The latter accounts for up to 8% of all global carbon emissions.

Successful tests

In the Green Concrete Lab, established in 2021 within the Department of Engineering Sciences (EnSci) on the Bloemfontein Campus of the University of the Free State (UFS), Dr Abdolhossein Naghizadeh, Senior Lecturer, researcher, and engineer, is working on green cement and concrete projects.

He uses ‘geopolymer’ technology and a mix of waste materials, alkaline solutions, and recycled aggregates to form concrete mixtures that can provide properties similar to conventional concrete.

Besides being a synthesised inorganic material (not a petrochemical product), the geopolymer cement he introduced has the following properties: it is made from a reaction between aluminosilicate materials and strong alkalis (5-7% of the concrete mixture), it uses water and by-products as raw materials, it does not calcinate lime, thus giving it a low carbon emission, and it is also beneficial from a waste management point of view.

The waste materials used can include waste from industrial and agricultural sources, such as fly ash, rice husk ash, sugar-cane bagasse, or corncob ash, as well as natural materials such as volcanic ash. In South Africa, sufficient amounts of industrial and agricultural waste are available.

“So far, we have successfully tested various types of green concrete based on different waste materials,” says Dr Naghizadeh.

Besides researching the green mixture proportions in the lab, Dr Naghizadeh and his students focused their attention on establishing the strength, durability, workability, and production cost of the product.

They compared green concrete with conventional concrete. Green concrete’s workability is slightly lower (but he believes that with appropriate mix design it can be corrected), and it has a much higher compressive strength (50-90 MPa), a smaller carbon footprint, and comparable production costs to conventional concrete (depending on the mix design). A very high level of resistance against alkali-silica reaction (concrete cancer) is also present, as well as resistance to carbonation, sulphate attack, and acid attack.

So far, we have successfully tested various types of green concrete based on different waste materials.– Dr Naghizadeh.

He explains, “The superior durability performance of green concrete is related to its chemical compositions and microstructure. For example, the lack of calcium content in the composition provides better resistance to alkali-silica reaction. At the same time, stronger bonds between elements and polymeric microstructure provide better resistance against acids and fire.”

With all the work and research of the past year and a half, Dr Naghizadeh says they are at the stage where they can prescribe green concrete production recipes for the industry parties based on the specified application and the materials they have.

Biggest accomplishments

“We transferred most of the experimental works to the Green Concrete Lab at the beginning of 2022, which improved our productivity tremendously. Since then, nine journal papers and three peer-reviewed conference papers have been published as outputs of the research projects. Currently, there are also multiple publications under review or in the development stages,” says Dr Naghizadeh.

In addition to him, there are three master's students and one research associate working on their own individual projects.

The department is very proud of its research outputs. Dr Naghizadeh was either author or co-author of all 12 research papers. The focus of these papers was mostly on the formulation of green concrete, based on locally available agricultural waste materials, the formulation of one-part geopolymer cement (when aluminosilicate raw material is replaced with pre-activated aluminosilicate material, water can be used instead of alkali solution), and the development of ambient-cured green concrete (replacing the aluminosilicate raw material with a blend of materials).

Dr Naghizadeh is also the project leader of a group of scientists from local and international universities who are researching sustainable construction materials. These institutions include the Universities of Johannesburg, KwaZulu-Natal, Yaoundé in Cameroon, Erzurum Technical University in Turkey, as well as Nelson Mandela University and the Central University of Technology, which recently came on board.

News Archive

MBA Programme - Question And Answer Sheet - 27 May 2004

2004-05-27

1. WHAT MUST THE UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE (UFS) DO TO GET FULL ACCREDITATION FOR THE MBA PROGRAMMES?

According to the Council on Higher Education’s (CHE) evaluation, the three MBA programmes of the UFS clearly and significantly contribute to students’ knowledge and skills, are relevant for the workplace, are appropriately resourced and have an appropriate internal and external programme environment. These programmes are the MBA General, the MBA in Health Care Management and the MBA in Entrepreneurship.

What the Council on Higher Education did find, was a few technical and administrative issues that need to be addressed.

This is why the three MBA programmes of the UFS received conditional accreditation – which in itself is a major achievement for the UFS’s School of Management, which was only four years old at the time of the evaluation.

The following breakdown gives one a sense of the mostly administrative nature of the conditions that have to be met before full accreditation is granted by the CHE:

a. A formal forum of stakeholders: The UFS is required to establish a more structured, inclusive process of review of its MBA programmes. This is an administrative formality already in process.

b. A work allocation model: According to the CHE this is required to regulate the workload of the teaching staff, particularly as student numbers grow, rather than via standard management processes as currently done.

c. Contractual agreements with part-time staff: The UFS is required to enter into formal agreements with part-time and contractual staff as all agreements are currently done on an informal and claim-basis. This is an administrative formality already in process.

d. A formal curriculum committee: According to the CHE, the School of Management had realised the need for a structure – other than the current Faculty Board - where all MBA lecturers can deliberate on the MBA programmes, and serve as a channel for faculty input, consultation and decision-making.

e. A system of external moderators: This need was already identified by the UFS and the system is to be implemented as early as July 2004.

f. A compulsory research component: The UFS is required to introduce a research component which will include the development of research skills for the business environment. The UFS management identified this need and has approved such a component - it is to take effect from January 2005. This is an insufficient element lacking in virtually all MBA programmes in South Africa.

g. Support programmes for learners having problems with numeracy: The UFS identified this as a need for academic support among some learners and has already developed such a programme which will be implemented from January 2005.

The majority of these conditions have been satisfied already and few remaining steps will take effect soon. It is for this reason that the UFS is confident that its three MBA programmes will soon receive full accreditation.

2. WHAT ACCREDITATION DOES THE UFS HAVE FOR ITS MBA PROGRAMME?

The UFS’s School of Management received conditional accreditation for its three MBA programmes.

Two levels of accreditation are awarded to tertiary institutions for their MBA programmes, namely full accreditation and conditional accreditation. When a programme does not comply with the minimum requirements regarding a small number of criteria, conditional accreditation is given. This can be rectified during the short or medium term.

3. IS THERE ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE ACADEMIC CORE OF THE UFS’s MBA PROGRAMMES?

No. The UFS is proud of its three MBA programmes’ reputation in the market and the positive feedback it receives from graduandi and their employers.

The MBA programmes of the UFS meet most of the minimum requirements of the evaluation process.

In particular, the key element of ‘teaching and learning’, which relates to the curriculum and content of the MBA programmes, is beyond question. In other words, the core of what is being taught in our MBA programmes is sound.

4. IS THE UFS’s MBA A WORTHWHILE QUALIFICATION?

Yes. Earlier this year, the School of Management – young as it is - was rated by employers as the best smaller business school in South Africa. This was based on a survey conducted by the Professional Management Review and reported in the Sunday Times Business Times, of 25 January 2004.

The UFS is committed to maintaining these high standards of quality, not only through compliance with the requirements of the CHE, but also through implementing its own quality assurance measures.

Another way in which we benchmark the quality of our MBA programmes is through the partnerships we have formed with institutions such as the DePaul University in Chicago and Kansas State University, both in the US, as well as the Robert Schuman University in France.

For this reason the UFS appreciates and supports the work of the CHE and welcomes its specific findings regarding the three MBA programmes.

It is understandable that the MBA review has caused some nervousness – not least among current MBA students throughout the country.

However, one principle that the UFS management is committed to is this: preparing all our students for a world of challenge and change. Without any doubt the MBA programme of the UFS is a solid preparation.

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept