Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
29 November 2022 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Leonie Bolleurs
UFS green concrete
The Department of Engineering Sciences (EnSci) welcomes collaborations with other departments at the UFS. Pictured here are, from the left: Louis Lagrange, Head of EnSci, Prof Kahilu Kajimo-Shakantu, Head of the Department of Quantity Surveying and Construction Management, Dr Abdolhossein Naghizadeh, and Megan Welman-Purchase, analytical scientist in the Department of Geology.

More than 30 million tonnes of fly ash (residue from coal combustion in power plants) are generated in South Africa annually, with 96% of that being disposed of in landfills. There is thus more than enough of this key ingredient to produce green concrete. 

Green concrete, so called due to its environmentally friendly benefits, is an eco-friendly alternative to conventional concrete based on the Portland cement binder. During the production of green concrete, less carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere than with the production of ordinary Portland cement (OPC). The latter accounts for up to 8% of all global carbon emissions.

Successful tests

In the Green Concrete Lab, established in 2021 within the Department of Engineering Sciences (EnSci) on the Bloemfontein Campus of the University of the Free State (UFS), Dr Abdolhossein Naghizadeh, Senior Lecturer, researcher, and engineer, is working on green cement and concrete projects.

He uses ‘geopolymer’ technology and a mix of waste materials, alkaline solutions, and recycled aggregates to form concrete mixtures that can provide properties similar to conventional concrete.

Besides being a synthesised inorganic material (not a petrochemical product), the geopolymer cement he introduced has the following properties: it is made from a reaction between aluminosilicate materials and strong alkalis (5-7% of the concrete mixture), it uses water and by-products as raw materials, it does not calcinate lime, thus giving it a low carbon emission, and it is also beneficial from a waste management point of view. 

The waste materials used can include waste from industrial and agricultural sources, such as fly ash, rice husk ash, sugar-cane bagasse, or corncob ash, as well as natural materials such as volcanic ash. In South Africa, sufficient amounts of industrial and agricultural waste are available. 

“So far, we have successfully tested various types of green concrete based on different waste materials,” says Dr Naghizadeh. 

Besides researching the green mixture proportions in the lab, Dr Naghizadeh and his students focused their attention on establishing the strength, durability, workability, and production cost of the product. 

They compared green concrete with conventional concrete. Green concrete’s workability is slightly lower (but he believes that with appropriate mix design it can be corrected), and it has a much higher compressive strength (50-90 MPa), a smaller carbon footprint, and comparable production costs to conventional concrete (depending on the mix design). A very high level of resistance against alkali-silica reaction (concrete cancer) is also present, as well as resistance to carbonation, sulphate attack, and acid attack.
So far, we have successfully tested various types of green concrete based on different waste materials.– Dr Naghizadeh. 

He explains, “The superior durability performance of green concrete is related to its chemical compositions and microstructure. For example, the lack of calcium content in the composition provides better resistance to alkali-silica reaction. At the same time, stronger bonds between elements and polymeric microstructure provide better resistance against acids and fire.”

With all the work and research of the past year and a half, Dr Naghizadeh says they are at the stage where they can prescribe green concrete production recipes for the industry parties based on the specified application and the materials they have.

Biggest accomplishments

“We transferred most of the experimental works to the Green Concrete Lab at the beginning of 2022, which improved our productivity tremendously. Since then, nine journal papers and three peer-reviewed conference papers have been published as outputs of the research projects. Currently, there are also multiple publications under review or in the development stages,” says Dr Naghizadeh.

In addition to him, there are three master's students and one research associate working on their own individual projects.

The department is very proud of its research outputs. Dr Naghizadeh was either author or co-author of all 12 research papers. The focus of these papers was mostly on the formulation of green concrete, based on locally available agricultural waste materials, the formulation of one-part geopolymer cement (when aluminosilicate raw material is replaced with pre-activated aluminosilicate material, water can be used instead of alkali solution), and the development of ambient-cured green concrete (replacing the aluminosilicate raw material with a blend of materials).

Dr Naghizadeh is also the project leader of a group of scientists from local and international universities who are researching sustainable construction materials. These institutions include the Universities of Johannesburg, KwaZulu-Natal, Yaoundé in Cameroon, Erzurum Technical University in Turkey, as well as Nelson Mandela University and the Central University of Technology, which recently came on board. 

 


 


News Archive

Reaction by the Rector of the UFS after a meeting with student leaders
2008-02-25

Reaction by the Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS, Prof. Frederick Fourie, on the agreement reached at a meeting with student leaders held on Friday, 22 February 2008

Note: This is meant to be used together with the full joint statement that was issued by the UFS management and student leaders on 22 February 2008.

The memorandum of the primes of the University of the Free State’s (UFS) residences was handed to top management on Wednesday, 20 February 2008. In the memorandum they asked for a meeting with the UFS management by Friday, 22 February 2008. Such a meeting was arranged and took place.

The UFS top management, all the residence primes as well as the house committee member for first years, the executive of the Main Campus Student Representative Council (SRC) and residence heads were present.

In contrast to what is suggested in the Volksblad report of Saturday, the discussion went off very well. There was no consternation or shouting or “emotions that ran high”. It was a civilised, decent meeting as it should be at a good university. Of course, now and again individuals spoke out strongly and very enthusiastically, but it was all decent and orderly. The contribution of the primes was insightful and well formulated.

Because the top management and I wanted to listen very carefully what the problems and frustrations were, we spent nearly five hours in the meeting. The issues in the memorandum were discussed one by one. In some cases I could take a decision immediately and finalise the matter, in other cases, the management provided information that could largely finalise a matter. A number of other matters must be investigated further.

The management undertook to respond comprehensively and in writing to all the issues raised in the memorandum by Monday, 25 February 2008. This will be handed to the primes but will not be handed to the media beforehand.
It is obvious that there are matters at the university that can be better managed and that there are problems with communication within the Student Affairs division. A major change such as the new policy on diversity places huge demands on management and the administration, and problems were to be expected. However, we understand the frustration of the students in residences.

On the other hand, students don’t always make matters easier. The strong opposition of white student leaders last year, and their unwillingness to co-operate in preparation for 2008 is well known. This year it is going better. But often student leaders take positions that are very inflexible. They also see no room for adapting old habits and simply want their own way. Their contributions are then full of statements such as “It cannot be done”. This delays measures such as the full implementation of expert interpreting services, which, for the management, is a very important measure (and which is functioning very well in certain residences). Communication from student leaders to management is also not always what it should be.

At the end of the meeting student leaders and management reached an important agreement and issued a joint statement in which they committed themselves to the integration process and to good co-operation and communication. This was an important step which is a sign of rebuilding trust. Naturally everyone will still have to work hard to build on this and to strengthen mutual trust.

The course and outcome of Friday’s discussions, as requested by the student leaders, show that issues can be addressed and resolved by means of us talking to one another. This is why it is so sad that primes and house committee members went on strike on Wednesday already and stayed in tents in front of the Main Building – leaving their residences without its leadership. This created an opening for what appears to have been well planned and co-ordinated acts of vandalism by inhabitants of residences on the campus on Wednesday.

Such vandalism is unacceptable and no one can justify it.

Fortunately, order could be restored quickly during the night and all academic activities could resume without any disruption on Thursday and Friday.

FCvN Fourie

Media Release
Issued by: Lacea Loader
Assistant Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2584
Cell: 083 645 2454
E-mail: loaderl.stg@ufs.ac.za   
24 February 2008

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept