Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
19 June 2023 | Story André Damons | Photo André Damons
Prof Jan Du Plessis
Prof Jan du Plessis is Head of the Paediatric Oncology Unit at the University of the Free State.

Many children in South Africa diagnosed with childhood cancer have a poorer overall survival rate and are more likely to abandon their treatment because they experience high poverty and food insecurity at home.

This is according to findings from a new study which Prof Jan du Plessis, Head of the Paediatric Oncology Unit at the University of the Free State (UFS), was part of. The study, titled ‘Prevalence of Poverty and Hunger at Cancer Diagnosis and Its Association with Malnutrition and Overall Survival in South Africa’, was recently published in the journal Nutrition and Cancer.

It found a high prevalence of poverty and hunger among South African children diagnosed with cancer. Food insecurity was associated with treatment abandonment and poorer overall survival.

The research was conceptualised by Judy Schoeman, dietitian at the Steve Biko Academic Hospital, as part of her PhD study. Prof Du Plessis and departmental dietitian Mariechen Herholdt, who recognised the importance and value of this study, enrolled patients, collected data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. Five different paediatric oncology units throughout the country participated.

Stunting as indicator of chronic malnutrition

Prof Du Plessis says stunting is an indicator of chronic malnutrition, and causes tissue damage, reduced function of neurotransmitters, and decreased overall development of all factors. Stunting is also associated with reduced lung growth and -function, which can influence the prevalence of pulmonary infections, have an impact on morbidity, and increase the risk of mortality. It also affects cognitive development, with poorer academic achievement and reduced economic productivity for children and adults affected by stunting.

“Our study found that South African children with malnutrition at cancer diagnosis often experienced food insecurity at home, underscoring the need to address primary rather than secondary malnutrition. This observation was especially apparent among children from rural provinces,” Prof Du Plessis says. “Many children in our study experienced high poverty and food insecurity risk at diagnosis; thus, nutritional counselling targeting dietary intake in the home setting should be a priority for these patients.”

High-quality diet may have protective effect

Recent literature has found that a high-quality diet may have a protective effect against some treatment-related toxicities of cancer treatment. Hunger at home was significantly associated with increased risk for treatment abandonment and risk of death.

Prof Du Plessis states, “According to the South African census (2015), 30 million people live on less than R84.11 (US$5) per day, and 55% of South African children live below the ultra-poverty line (R800/month or US$45.81/month)…

“In a previous South African study of children with germ cell tumours from families with higher socioeconomic status (household income of US$191/year or US$6/day), they have experienced significantly improved overall survival (OS) at five years. Indonesian children from low-income families diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia have also experienced significantly lower event-free survival two years or longer after diagnosis than those from higher-income families.”

Prof Du Plessis says nutritional intervention should be implemented from diagnosis to improve patients’ nutritional status and survival.

Enhance collaborations to enhance outcomes

The study further illustrated that children with stunting and malnutrition at cancer diagnosis were more likely to live in poverty, thereby highlighting a group of children needing social services and support networks over and above the existing structures available to South African children with cancer.

The study underscores the need for medical centres to enhance collaboration with organisations that provide financial and/or other support to families throughout treatment to enhance outcomes.

The study came about as poor nutritional status in children with cancer has been associated with poorer cancer outcomes. Identifying modifiable risk factors that lead to poor nutrition in children with cancer is an understudied area, especially in a country such as South Africa, explains Prof Du Plessis. 

“Understanding the scope of poverty and hunger and its association with nutritional status among children undergoing cancer treatment is needed. As half of South Africans experience chronic poverty over time, food insecurity will be affected; we investigated the prevalence of poverty and food insecurity at cancer diagnosis, their association with malnutrition at the time of diagnosis, and overall survival at one year post-diagnosis.

“Malnutrition is a modifiable prognostic risk factor. The findings underscore the importance of incorporating an assessment of the risk of living in poverty and/or with food insecurity at diagnosis – and potentially throughout therapy – to ensure that families are referred to appropriate support networks. Evaluating sociodemographic factors at diagnosis is essential among South African children to identify at-risk children and implement adequate nutritional support during cancer treatment,” Prof Du Plessis concludes.

This research aligns with the UFS’s Vision 130 – to not only be a university that cares and is sustainable, but also to be a research-led, student-centred, and regionally engaged university that contributes to development and social justice. This knowledge will assist in efficiently allocating hospital resources and establishing support networks to ensure that the most vulnerable children are supported with proactive nutrition interventions while undergoing cancer treatment.

News Archive

Council on Higher Education LLB qualification review not yet complete
2017-05-16

The reaction from various stakeholders following the ‘Outcomes of the National Review of the LLB Qualification’ by the Council on Higher Education (CHE) on 12 April 2017 requires the CHE to clarify that the national review process has not been completed and is ongoing.

The peer-review process conducted under the auspices of the CHE is based on the LLB Standards Document which was developed in 2014-2015 with input from higher-education institutions and the organised legal profession. Following self-review and site visits by peers, the process is now at the point where commendations and shortcomings have been identified, and the statement of 12 April reflects those findings. All law faculties and schools have been asked to improve their LLB programmes to meet the LLB Standard, and no LLB programme has been de-accredited. All institutions retain the accreditation they had before the Review process began and all institutions are working towards retaining their accreditation and improving their LLB programmes.

The South African Law Deans’ Association (SALDA) has issued a set of responses regarding the LLB programme review. The following questions and answers were published to give more clarity on the questions raised.

1.    What is the effect of a finding of conditional accreditation?
The programme remains accredited.

(“Accreditation refers to a recognition status granted to a programme for a stipulated period of time after an HEQC evaluation indicates that it meets minimum standards of quality.”)

The institution must submit a progress report by 6 October 2017 that indicates how short-term aspects raised in the HEQC reports have been addressed and an improvement plan to indicate how longer-term aspects will be addressed.

2.    What is the effect of a finding of notice of withdrawal of accreditation?
The programme remains accredited.

The institution must submit an improvement plan by 6 October 2017 to indicate how the issues raised in the HEQC report will be addressed, including time frames.

3.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect current students?
Students currently enrolled for the LLB programme at any institution are not affected at all. They will graduate with an accredited qualification.

4.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect new applicants?
The programmes remain accredited and institutions may enrol new students as usual. This also includes students completing BA/BCom (Law) programmes who wish to continue with the LLB programme.

5.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect prior graduates?
Degrees previously conferred are not affected.

6.    What happens when the improvement plans are submitted in October 2017?
The CHE will evaluate the plans when they are submitted, and the programmes remain accredited until a decision is taken whether the improvement plan is sufficient and has been fully given effect to or not. The institutions will have to submit progress reports to the CHE indicating implementation of measures contained in the improvement plan.

Should a decision at some stage be taken that a programme’s accreditation must be withdrawn, a teaching-out plan would be implemented so that all enrolled students would have the opportunity to graduate with an accredited degree.

For more information on the CHE’s pronouncement please contact Moleboheng Moshe-Bereng on MosheBerengMF@ufs.ac.za.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept