Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
19 June 2023 | Story André Damons | Photo André Damons
Prof Jan Du Plessis
Prof Jan du Plessis is Head of the Paediatric Oncology Unit at the University of the Free State.

Many children in South Africa diagnosed with childhood cancer have a poorer overall survival rate and are more likely to abandon their treatment because they experience high poverty and food insecurity at home.

This is according to findings from a new study which Prof Jan du Plessis, Head of the Paediatric Oncology Unit at the University of the Free State (UFS), was part of. The study, titled ‘Prevalence of Poverty and Hunger at Cancer Diagnosis and Its Association with Malnutrition and Overall Survival in South Africa’, was recently published in the journal Nutrition and Cancer.

It found a high prevalence of poverty and hunger among South African children diagnosed with cancer. Food insecurity was associated with treatment abandonment and poorer overall survival.

The research was conceptualised by Judy Schoeman, dietitian at the Steve Biko Academic Hospital, as part of her PhD study. Prof Du Plessis and departmental dietitian Mariechen Herholdt, who recognised the importance and value of this study, enrolled patients, collected data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. Five different paediatric oncology units throughout the country participated.

Stunting as indicator of chronic malnutrition

Prof Du Plessis says stunting is an indicator of chronic malnutrition, and causes tissue damage, reduced function of neurotransmitters, and decreased overall development of all factors. Stunting is also associated with reduced lung growth and -function, which can influence the prevalence of pulmonary infections, have an impact on morbidity, and increase the risk of mortality. It also affects cognitive development, with poorer academic achievement and reduced economic productivity for children and adults affected by stunting.

“Our study found that South African children with malnutrition at cancer diagnosis often experienced food insecurity at home, underscoring the need to address primary rather than secondary malnutrition. This observation was especially apparent among children from rural provinces,” Prof Du Plessis says. “Many children in our study experienced high poverty and food insecurity risk at diagnosis; thus, nutritional counselling targeting dietary intake in the home setting should be a priority for these patients.”

High-quality diet may have protective effect

Recent literature has found that a high-quality diet may have a protective effect against some treatment-related toxicities of cancer treatment. Hunger at home was significantly associated with increased risk for treatment abandonment and risk of death.

Prof Du Plessis states, “According to the South African census (2015), 30 million people live on less than R84.11 (US$5) per day, and 55% of South African children live below the ultra-poverty line (R800/month or US$45.81/month)…

“In a previous South African study of children with germ cell tumours from families with higher socioeconomic status (household income of US$191/year or US$6/day), they have experienced significantly improved overall survival (OS) at five years. Indonesian children from low-income families diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia have also experienced significantly lower event-free survival two years or longer after diagnosis than those from higher-income families.”

Prof Du Plessis says nutritional intervention should be implemented from diagnosis to improve patients’ nutritional status and survival.

Enhance collaborations to enhance outcomes

The study further illustrated that children with stunting and malnutrition at cancer diagnosis were more likely to live in poverty, thereby highlighting a group of children needing social services and support networks over and above the existing structures available to South African children with cancer.

The study underscores the need for medical centres to enhance collaboration with organisations that provide financial and/or other support to families throughout treatment to enhance outcomes.

The study came about as poor nutritional status in children with cancer has been associated with poorer cancer outcomes. Identifying modifiable risk factors that lead to poor nutrition in children with cancer is an understudied area, especially in a country such as South Africa, explains Prof Du Plessis. 

“Understanding the scope of poverty and hunger and its association with nutritional status among children undergoing cancer treatment is needed. As half of South Africans experience chronic poverty over time, food insecurity will be affected; we investigated the prevalence of poverty and food insecurity at cancer diagnosis, their association with malnutrition at the time of diagnosis, and overall survival at one year post-diagnosis.

“Malnutrition is a modifiable prognostic risk factor. The findings underscore the importance of incorporating an assessment of the risk of living in poverty and/or with food insecurity at diagnosis – and potentially throughout therapy – to ensure that families are referred to appropriate support networks. Evaluating sociodemographic factors at diagnosis is essential among South African children to identify at-risk children and implement adequate nutritional support during cancer treatment,” Prof Du Plessis concludes.

This research aligns with the UFS’s Vision 130 – to not only be a university that cares and is sustainable, but also to be a research-led, student-centred, and regionally engaged university that contributes to development and social justice. This knowledge will assist in efficiently allocating hospital resources and establishing support networks to ensure that the most vulnerable children are supported with proactive nutrition interventions while undergoing cancer treatment.

News Archive

Lessons of The Spear
2012-08-14

 Discussing weighty issues at the UFS were from left: Prof. Jonathan Jansen; Vice-Chancellor and Rector; Nic Dawes, Editor-in-Chief, Mail & Guardian; Max du Preez: Investigative journalist and political columnist; Ferial Haffajee: Editor, City Press; and Justice Malala: Political commentator and newspaper columnist.
Photo: Johan Roux
14 August 2012

What were South Africans left with after The Spear? More importantly, what did we learn from The Spear?

These were the issues discussed at a seminar, Beyond the Spear, on the controversial Brett Murray painting at the Bloemfontein Campus of the University of the Free State (UFS) on Monday 13 August 2012.

The university hosted this seminar, Beyond the Spear, in conjunction with acclaimed journalists, to look deeper into the lessons that South Africans learnt from this painting and the reaction from the public and politicians following soon after it went on display at the Goodman Gallery in Johannesburg.

The four panellists, Mr Justice Malala (political analyst, journalist and host of the news show, The Justice Factor), Mr Nic Dawes (editor in chief of Mail & Guardian), Mr Max du Preez (investigative journalist and political columnist) and Ms Ferial Haffajee (editor of City Press), all presented their views and experiences on the public’s perceptions of this artwork.

In his opening remarks, Prof. Jonathan Jansen, Vice-Chancellor and Rector, said the purpose of the seminar was to help us make sense of what happened. Prof. Jansen also chaired this seminar.

“This being South Africa, there will be more ‘Spears’. More public crises will unfold that divide the nation and that will stir the emotions. We need to understand what happened so that we are better prepared to deal with the coming ‘Spears’.”

Issues on leadership, South Africa’s hurtful past and the freedom of expression were some of the topics raised by the panellists.

“This has taught us that South Africans – especially the older generation – still need to vent their anger… White South Africa must be patient and allow black citizens to shout at them,” said Mr Du Preez. He warned that this anger should serve a constructive purpose. In reaction to a question if Brett Murray did not disrespect Pres. Jacob Zuma’s dignity with his controversial painting, he said that this painting was “…rude and disrespectful.”

“It was meant to be. It was not honouring him.” He said that politicians will do anything, including messing with the country’s stability, to further their own interests. “From now on we need to be far more alert, far more cynical about our politicians.”

Mr Dawes shared his experience and said that the debates around The Spear were very painful considering where the nation has come from. He said the painting opened up painful pasts and difficult spaces. “It is up to the media to open up these difficult spaces.” He said the painting also brought up questions of how South Africans deal and live with pain. “South Africa must live with its past. The debate should now be how to preserve space for the country’s ghosts and how its citizens could get the resilience to deal with it.”

Ms Haffajee, who was caught in the crossfire between freedom of expression and human dignity and who refused to remove a picture of the painting from the City Press website, said that the media was viciously played by politicians.

“This had shown that achieving freedom took many lives, but it took very little to kill it.” She said The Spear is art that it is part of a rich cultural heritage of protest art.

Mr Malala said with the debates around The Spear painting, something died in South Africa. “The debate was taken away from us. We let politicians get to us.”

After the panellists delivered their presentations, Prof. Jansen led a discussion session between the audience and the panellists.
 

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept