Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
19 June 2023 | Story André Damons | Photo André Damons
Prof Jan Du Plessis
Prof Jan du Plessis is Head of the Paediatric Oncology Unit at the University of the Free State.

Many children in South Africa diagnosed with childhood cancer have a poorer overall survival rate and are more likely to abandon their treatment because they experience high poverty and food insecurity at home.

This is according to findings from a new study which Prof Jan du Plessis, Head of the Paediatric Oncology Unit at the University of the Free State (UFS), was part of. The study, titled ‘Prevalence of Poverty and Hunger at Cancer Diagnosis and Its Association with Malnutrition and Overall Survival in South Africa’, was recently published in the journal Nutrition and Cancer.

It found a high prevalence of poverty and hunger among South African children diagnosed with cancer. Food insecurity was associated with treatment abandonment and poorer overall survival.

The research was conceptualised by Judy Schoeman, dietitian at the Steve Biko Academic Hospital, as part of her PhD study. Prof Du Plessis and departmental dietitian Mariechen Herholdt, who recognised the importance and value of this study, enrolled patients, collected data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. Five different paediatric oncology units throughout the country participated.

Stunting as indicator of chronic malnutrition

Prof Du Plessis says stunting is an indicator of chronic malnutrition, and causes tissue damage, reduced function of neurotransmitters, and decreased overall development of all factors. Stunting is also associated with reduced lung growth and -function, which can influence the prevalence of pulmonary infections, have an impact on morbidity, and increase the risk of mortality. It also affects cognitive development, with poorer academic achievement and reduced economic productivity for children and adults affected by stunting.

“Our study found that South African children with malnutrition at cancer diagnosis often experienced food insecurity at home, underscoring the need to address primary rather than secondary malnutrition. This observation was especially apparent among children from rural provinces,” Prof Du Plessis says. “Many children in our study experienced high poverty and food insecurity risk at diagnosis; thus, nutritional counselling targeting dietary intake in the home setting should be a priority for these patients.”

High-quality diet may have protective effect

Recent literature has found that a high-quality diet may have a protective effect against some treatment-related toxicities of cancer treatment. Hunger at home was significantly associated with increased risk for treatment abandonment and risk of death.

Prof Du Plessis states, “According to the South African census (2015), 30 million people live on less than R84.11 (US$5) per day, and 55% of South African children live below the ultra-poverty line (R800/month or US$45.81/month)…

“In a previous South African study of children with germ cell tumours from families with higher socioeconomic status (household income of US$191/year or US$6/day), they have experienced significantly improved overall survival (OS) at five years. Indonesian children from low-income families diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia have also experienced significantly lower event-free survival two years or longer after diagnosis than those from higher-income families.”

Prof Du Plessis says nutritional intervention should be implemented from diagnosis to improve patients’ nutritional status and survival.

Enhance collaborations to enhance outcomes

The study further illustrated that children with stunting and malnutrition at cancer diagnosis were more likely to live in poverty, thereby highlighting a group of children needing social services and support networks over and above the existing structures available to South African children with cancer.

The study underscores the need for medical centres to enhance collaboration with organisations that provide financial and/or other support to families throughout treatment to enhance outcomes.

The study came about as poor nutritional status in children with cancer has been associated with poorer cancer outcomes. Identifying modifiable risk factors that lead to poor nutrition in children with cancer is an understudied area, especially in a country such as South Africa, explains Prof Du Plessis. 

“Understanding the scope of poverty and hunger and its association with nutritional status among children undergoing cancer treatment is needed. As half of South Africans experience chronic poverty over time, food insecurity will be affected; we investigated the prevalence of poverty and food insecurity at cancer diagnosis, their association with malnutrition at the time of diagnosis, and overall survival at one year post-diagnosis.

“Malnutrition is a modifiable prognostic risk factor. The findings underscore the importance of incorporating an assessment of the risk of living in poverty and/or with food insecurity at diagnosis – and potentially throughout therapy – to ensure that families are referred to appropriate support networks. Evaluating sociodemographic factors at diagnosis is essential among South African children to identify at-risk children and implement adequate nutritional support during cancer treatment,” Prof Du Plessis concludes.

This research aligns with the UFS’s Vision 130 – to not only be a university that cares and is sustainable, but also to be a research-led, student-centred, and regionally engaged university that contributes to development and social justice. This knowledge will assist in efficiently allocating hospital resources and establishing support networks to ensure that the most vulnerable children are supported with proactive nutrition interventions while undergoing cancer treatment.

News Archive

Inaugural lecture: Prof. Phillipe Burger
2007-11-26

 

Attending the lecture were, from the left: Prof. Tienie Crous (Dean of the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences at the UFS), Prof. Phillipe Burger (Departmental Chairperson of the Department of Economics at the UFS), and Prof. Frederick Fourie (Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS).
Photo: Stephen Collet

 
A summary of an inaugural lecture presented by Prof. Phillipe Burger on the topic: “The ups and downs of the South African Economy: Rough seas or smooth sailing?”

South African business cycle shows reduction in volatility

Better monetary policy and improvements in the financial sector that place less liquidity constraints on individuals is one of the main reasons for the reduction in the volatility of the South African economy. The improvement in access to the financial sector also enables individuals to manage their debt better.

These are some of the findings in an analysis on the volatility of the South African business cycle done by Prof. Philippe Burger, Departmental Chairperson of the University of the Free State’s (UFS) Department of Economics.

Prof. Burger delivered his inaugural lecture last night (22 November 2007) on the Main Campus in Bloemfontein on the topic “The ups and downs of the South African Economy: Rough seas or smooth sailing?”

In his lecture, Prof. Burger emphasised a few key aspects of the South African business cycle and indicated how it changed during the periods 1960-1976, 1976-1994 en 1994-2006.

With the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as an indicator of the business cycle, the analysis identified the variables that showed the highest correlation with the GDP. During the periods 1976-1994 and 1994-2006, these included durable consumption, manufacturing investment, private sector investment, as well as investment in machinery and non-residential buildings. Other variables that also show a high correlation with the GDP are imports, non-durable consumption, investment in the financial services sector, investment by general government, as well as investment in residential buildings.

Prof. Burger’s analysis also shows that changes in durable consumption, investment in the manufacturing sector, investment in the private sector, as well as investment in non-residential buildings preceded changes in the GDP. If changes in a variable such as durable consumption precede changes in the GDP, it is an indication that durable consumption is one of the drivers of the business cycle. The up or down swing of durable consumption may, in other words, just as well contribute to an up or down swing in the business cycle.

A surprising finding of the analysis is the particularly strong role durable consumption has played in the business cycle since 1994. This finding is especially surprising due to the fact that durable consumption only constitutes about 12% of the total household consumption.

A further surprising finding is the particularly small role exports have been playing since 1960 as a driver of the business cycle. In South Africa it is still generally accepted that exports are one of the most important drivers of the business cycle. It is generally accepted that, should the business cycles of South Africa’s most important trade partners show an upward phase; these partners will purchase more from South Africa. This increase in exports will contribute to the South African economy moving upward. Prof. Burger’s analyses shows, however, that exports have generally never fulfil this role.

Over and above the identification of the drivers of the South African business cycle, Prof. Burger’s analysis also investigated the volatility of the business cycle.

When the periods 1976-1994 and 1994-2006 are compared, the analysis shows that the volatility of the business cycle has reduced since 1994 with more than half. The reduction in volatility can be traced to the reduction in the volatility of household consumption (especially durables and services), as well as a reduction in the volatility of investment in machinery, non-residential buildings and transport equipment. The last three coincide with the general reduction in the volatility of investment in the manufacturing sector. Investment in sectors such as electricity and transport (not to be confused with investment in transport equipment by various sectors) which are strongly dominated by the government, did not contribute to the decrease in volatility.

In his analysis, Prof. Burger supplies reasons for the reduction in volatility. One of the explanations is the reduction in the shocks affecting the economy – especially in the South African context. Another explanation is the application of an improved monetary policy by the South African Reserve Bank since the mid 1990’s. A third explanation is the better access to liquidity and credit since the mid 1990’s, which enables the better management of household finance and the absorption of financial shocks.

A further reason which contributed to the reduction in volatility in countries such as the United States of America’s business cycle is better inventory management. While the volatility of inventory in South Africa has also reduced there is, according to Prof. Burger, little proof that better inventory management contributed to the reduction in volatility of the GDP.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept