Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
24 March 2023 | Story Profs Gladys Kigozi-Male, Christo Heunis, and Michelle Engelbrecht | Photo Supplied
Prof Christo Heunis, Prof Michelle Engelbrecht, Prof Gladys Kigozi-Male
From the left, Prof Christo, Prof Michelle Engelbrecht, and Prof Gladys Kigozi-Male.

 Opinion article by Profs Gladys Kigozi-Male, Christo Heunis, and Michelle Engelbrecht, Centre for Health Systems Research and Development, University of the Free State.


Each year on 24 March, the world commemorates World TB (Tuberculosis) Day. This date coincides with the day in 1882 when Robert Koch announced his discovery of the Mycobacterium Tuberculosis, the germ that causes TB. This infectious disease is transmitted through airborne droplets when an infected person coughs, sings, shouts, or sneezes. TB primarily affects the lungs (i.e., pulmonary TB), but other organs in the body such as the pleura, lymph nodes, abdomen, genitourinary tract, skin, joints and bones, or meninges (i.e., extra-pulmonary TB) can also be affected. TB can be cured; effective anti-TB drugs have been available for almost eight decades. Despite this, TB continues to wreak havoc across the world and in South Africa. According to a report released by the World Health Organisation (WHO), an estimated 304 000 new TB cases were reported in South Africa in 2021 and 56 000 people succumbed to the disease in the same year

A world without TB

In 2014, the sixty-seventh World Health Assembly endorsed a global strategy and targets for TB prevention, care, and control. The strategy envisions a world without TB, aiming to end the epidemic by 2035. By this target date, a reduction in TB deaths of 95% and new infections of 90% – compared to the respective levels in 2015 – are anticipated. Further to this, the United Nations’ Stop TB Partnership was mandated to drive activities to end the global TB epidemic. In 2015, the partnership launched the 90-(90)-90 targets; to reach at least 90% of people with TB and place them on appropriate treatment, including at least 90% of vulnerable populations such as people living with HIV, and to ensure that at least 90% of people with TB are successfully treated. Despite commendable progress, persisting high TB infection and death rates are adversely affecting global and national efforts to end the TB epidemic. With a treatment success rate of only 78% in 2020, South Africa is sorely challenged to attain the global target of 95%.

TB with mental health illness

One of the challenges confronting TB control is the frequent comorbidity of TB with mental health illness. There is compelling evidence linking TB to common mental health problems such as depression, anxiety, and alcohol misuse. Research indicates that TB patients can experience mental health problems at any time during the course of their TB treatment. Undiagnosed mental illness among TB patients may result in poor health-seeking behaviour and non-adherence to treatment, subpar quality of life, and negative treatment outcomes. The WHO's Global End TB Strategy thus recommends integrated patient-centred TB care. This implies that TB care should be provided in close collaboration with other primary health-care (PHC) programmes such as mental health. However, in many countries – South Africa included – efforts to integrate mental health and TB care are confronted by challenges such as limited capacity, nonrecognition of mental health as a problem, insufficient resources, and TB-related social stigma. Consequently, mental health conditions in TB patients are often un-/under-/mis-diagnosed.

Taking depression as a compelling example, a scoping review reported the prevalence of depression as high as 84% among people with TB in studies conducted internationally. However, little is known about the prevalence of depression among TB patients in South Africa. Using a nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire, we assessed probable depression among a sample of TB patients attending PHC facilities in the Free State. We found that almost half (46,1%) of the 208 patients interviewed had probable depression, with 22,6%, 18,8%, and 4,8% having mild, moderate, and severe symptoms, respectively. Probable depression was almost four times more likely among patients diagnosed with extra-pulmonary TB compared to pulmonary TB patients. HIV-infected TB patients undergoing antiretroviral therapy were more than twice as likely to experience symptoms of depression compared to their counterparts who were not undergoing such therapy. This could possibly be attributed to non-adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Studies elsewhere have established a significant association between depression and ART non-adherence. We further found that the longer patients were retained on TB treatment, the less likely they were to display symptoms of depression.

Important to monitor TB patients for depression

Based on these findings, it is important to monitor TB patients for symptoms of depression – particularly those with comorbid HIV – in PHC settings. At the same time, ensuring that patients stay on treatment by providing adequate support for treatment adherence may help to mitigate depression during TB treatment. 

The theme for this year’s World TB Day is ‘Yes! We can end TB’. It is a call for concerted multi-sectoral collaboration between governments, civil society, communities, academia and technical partners, international aid and scientific organisations, the private sector, and disease control programmes in the country to eliminate the TB epidemic. To this end, TB patients attending PHC facilities in South Africa need to be routinely screened for mental health illness. Given the critical shortage of mental health specialists, screening for mental illnesses could be undertaken by trained and well-supervised non-specialist healthcare cadres such as community health workers.

News Archive

MBA Programme - Question And Answer Sheet - 27 May 2004
2004-05-27

1. WHAT MUST THE UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE (UFS) DO TO GET FULL ACCREDITATION FOR THE MBA PROGRAMMES?

According to the Council on Higher Education’s (CHE) evaluation, the three MBA programmes of the UFS clearly and significantly contribute to students’ knowledge and skills, are relevant for the workplace, are appropriately resourced and have an appropriate internal and external programme environment. These programmes are the MBA General, the MBA in Health Care Management and the MBA in Entrepreneurship.

What the Council on Higher Education did find, was a few technical and administrative issues that need to be addressed.

This is why the three MBA programmes of the UFS received conditional accreditation – which in itself is a major achievement for the UFS’s School of Management, which was only four years old at the time of the evaluation.

The following breakdown gives one a sense of the mostly administrative nature of the conditions that have to be met before full accreditation is granted by the CHE:

a. A formal forum of stakeholders: The UFS is required to establish a more structured, inclusive process of review of its MBA programmes. This is an administrative formality already in process.

b. A work allocation model: According to the CHE this is required to regulate the workload of the teaching staff, particularly as student numbers grow, rather than via standard management processes as currently done.

c. Contractual agreements with part-time staff: The UFS is required to enter into formal agreements with part-time and contractual staff as all agreements are currently done on an informal and claim-basis. This is an administrative formality already in process.

d. A formal curriculum committee: According to the CHE, the School of Management had realised the need for a structure – other than the current Faculty Board - where all MBA lecturers can deliberate on the MBA programmes, and serve as a channel for faculty input, consultation and decision-making.

e. A system of external moderators: This need was already identified by the UFS and the system is to be implemented as early as July 2004.

f. A compulsory research component: The UFS is required to introduce a research component which will include the development of research skills for the business environment. The UFS management identified this need and has approved such a component - it is to take effect from January 2005. This is an insufficient element lacking in virtually all MBA programmes in South Africa.

g. Support programmes for learners having problems with numeracy: The UFS identified this as a need for academic support among some learners and has already developed such a programme which will be implemented from January 2005.

The majority of these conditions have been satisfied already and few remaining steps will take effect soon. It is for this reason that the UFS is confident that its three MBA programmes will soon receive full accreditation.

2. WHAT ACCREDITATION DOES THE UFS HAVE FOR ITS MBA PROGRAMME?

The UFS’s School of Management received conditional accreditation for its three MBA programmes.

Two levels of accreditation are awarded to tertiary institutions for their MBA programmes, namely full accreditation and conditional accreditation. When a programme does not comply with the minimum requirements regarding a small number of criteria, conditional accreditation is given. This can be rectified during the short or medium term.

3. IS THERE ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE ACADEMIC CORE OF THE UFS’s MBA PROGRAMMES?

No. The UFS is proud of its three MBA programmes’ reputation in the market and the positive feedback it receives from graduandi and their employers.

The MBA programmes of the UFS meet most of the minimum requirements of the evaluation process.

In particular, the key element of ‘teaching and learning’, which relates to the curriculum and content of the MBA programmes, is beyond question. In other words, the core of what is being taught in our MBA programmes is sound.

4. IS THE UFS’s MBA A WORTHWHILE QUALIFICATION?

Yes. Earlier this year, the School of Management – young as it is - was rated by employers as the best smaller business school in South Africa. This was based on a survey conducted by the Professional Management Review and reported in the Sunday Times Business Times, of 25 January 2004.

The UFS is committed to maintaining these high standards of quality, not only through compliance with the requirements of the CHE, but also through implementing its own quality assurance measures.

Another way in which we benchmark the quality of our MBA programmes is through the partnerships we have formed with institutions such as the DePaul University in Chicago and Kansas State University, both in the US, as well as the Robert Schuman University in France.

For this reason the UFS appreciates and supports the work of the CHE and welcomes its specific findings regarding the three MBA programmes.

It is understandable that the MBA review has caused some nervousness – not least among current MBA students throughout the country.

However, one principle that the UFS management is committed to is this: preparing all our students for a world of challenge and change. Without any doubt the MBA programme of the UFS is a solid preparation.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept