Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

Undiagnosed depression in tuberculosis patients threatens control of the disease

24 March 2023 | Story Profs Gladys Kigozi-Male, Christo Heunis, and Michelle Engelbrecht | Photo Supplied

Prof Christo Heunis, Prof Michelle Engelbrecht, Prof Gladys Kigozi-Male — From the left, Prof Christo, Prof Michelle Engelbrecht, and Prof Gladys Kigozi-Male.

Opinion article by Profs Gladys Kigozi-Male, Christo Heunis, and Michelle Engelbrecht, Centre for Health Systems Research and Development, University of the Free State.

Each year on 24 March, the world commemorates World TB (Tuberculosis) Day. This date coincides with the day in 1882 when Robert Koch announced his discovery of the Mycobacterium Tuberculosis, the germ that causes TB. This infectious disease is transmitted through airborne droplets when an infected person coughs, sings, shouts, or sneezes. TB primarily affects the lungs (i.e., pulmonary TB), but other organs in the body such as the pleura, lymph nodes, abdomen, genitourinary tract, skin, joints and bones, or meninges (i.e., extra-pulmonary TB) can also be affected. TB can be cured; effective anti-TB drugs have been available for almost eight decades. Despite this, TB continues to wreak havoc across the world and in South Africa. According to a report released by the World Health Organisation (WHO), an estimated 304 000 new TB cases were reported in South Africa in 2021 and 56 000 people succumbed to the disease in the same year

A world without TB

In 2014, the sixty-seventh World Health Assembly endorsed a global strategy and targets for TB prevention, care, and control. The strategy envisions a world without TB, aiming to end the epidemic by 2035. By this target date, a reduction in TB deaths of 95% and new infections of 90% – compared to the respective levels in 2015 – are anticipated. Further to this, the United Nations’ Stop TB Partnership was mandated to drive activities to end the global TB epidemic. In 2015, the partnership launched the 90-(90)-90 targets; to reach at least 90% of people with TB and place them on appropriate treatment, including at least 90% of vulnerable populations such as people living with HIV, and to ensure that at least 90% of people with TB are successfully treated. Despite commendable progress, persisting high TB infection and death rates are adversely affecting global and national efforts to end the TB epidemic. With a treatment success rate of only 78% in 2020, South Africa is sorely challenged to attain the global target of 95%.

TB with mental health illness

One of the challenges confronting TB control is the frequent comorbidity of TB with mental health illness. There is compelling evidence linking TB to common mental health problems such as depression, anxiety, and alcohol misuse. Research indicates that TB patients can experience mental health problems at any time during the course of their TB treatment. Undiagnosed mental illness among TB patients may result in poor health-seeking behaviour and non-adherence to treatment, subpar quality of life, and negative treatment outcomes. The WHO's Global End TB Strategy thus recommends integrated patient-centred TB care. This implies that TB care should be provided in close collaboration with other primary health-care (PHC) programmes such as mental health. However, in many countries – South Africa included – efforts to integrate mental health and TB care are confronted by challenges such as limited capacity, nonrecognition of mental health as a problem, insufficient resources, and TB-related social stigma. Consequently, mental health conditions in TB patients are often un-/under-/mis-diagnosed.

Taking depression as a compelling example, a scoping review reported the prevalence of depression as high as 84% among people with TB in studies conducted internationally. However, little is known about the prevalence of depression among TB patients in South Africa. Using a nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire, we assessed probable depression among a sample of TB patients attending PHC facilities in the Free State. We found that almost half (46,1%) of the 208 patients interviewed had probable depression, with 22,6%, 18,8%, and 4,8% having mild, moderate, and severe symptoms, respectively. Probable depression was almost four times more likely among patients diagnosed with extra-pulmonary TB compared to pulmonary TB patients. HIV-infected TB patients undergoing antiretroviral therapy were more than twice as likely to experience symptoms of depression compared to their counterparts who were not undergoing such therapy. This could possibly be attributed to non-adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Studies elsewhere have established a significant association between depression and ART non-adherence. We further found that the longer patients were retained on TB treatment, the less likely they were to display symptoms of depression.

Important to monitor TB patients for depression

Based on these findings, it is important to monitor TB patients for symptoms of depression – particularly those with comorbid HIV – in PHC settings. At the same time, ensuring that patients stay on treatment by providing adequate support for treatment adherence may help to mitigate depression during TB treatment.

The theme for this year’s World TB Day is ‘Yes! We can end TB’. It is a call for concerted multi-sectoral collaboration between governments, civil society, communities, academia and technical partners, international aid and scientific organisations, the private sector, and disease control programmes in the country to eliminate the TB epidemic. To this end, TB patients attending PHC facilities in South Africa need to be routinely screened for mental health illness. Given the critical shortage of mental health specialists, screening for mental illnesses could be undertaken by trained and well-supervised non-specialist healthcare cadres such as community health workers.

News Archive

Stem cell research and human cloning: legal and ethical focal points

2004-07-29

(Summary of the inaugural lecture of Prof Hennie Oosthuizen, from the Department of Criminal and Medical Law at the Faculty of Law of the University of the Free State.)

In the light of stem cell research, research on embryo’s and human cloning it will be fatal for legal advisors and researchers in South Africa to ignore the benefits that new bio-medical development, through research, contain for this country.

Legal advisors across the world have various views on stem cell research and human cloning. In the USA there is no legislation that regulates stem cell research but a number of States adopted legislation that approves stem cell research. The British Parlement gave permission for research on embryonic stem cells, but determined that it must be monitored closely and the European Union is of the opinion that it will open a door for race purification and commercial exploitation of human beings.

In South Africa the Bill on National Health makes provision for therapeutical and non therapeutical research. It also makes provision for therapeutical embryonical stem cell research on fetuses, which is not older than 14 days, as well as for therapeutical cloning under certain circumstances subject to the approval of the Minister. The Bill prohibits reproductive cloning.

Research on human embrio’s is a very controversial issue, here and in the rest of the world.

Researchers believe that the use of stem cell therapy could help to side-step the rejection of newly transplanted organs and tissue and if a bank for stem cell could be built, the shortage of organs for transplants would become something of the past. Stem cells could also be used for healing of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and spinal injuries.

Sources from which stem cells are obtained could also lead to further ethical issues. Stem cells are harvested from mature human cells and embryonic stem cells. Another source to be utilised is to take egg cells from the ovaries of aborted fetuses. This will be morally unacceptable for those against abortions. Linking a financial incentive to that could become more of a controversial issue because the woman’s decision to abort could be influenced. The ideal would be to rather use human fetus tissue from spontaneous abortions or extra-uterine pregnancies than induced abortions.

The potential to obtain stem cells from the blood of the umbilical cord, bone-marrow and fetus tissue and for these cells to arrange themselves is known for quite some time. Blood from the umbilical cord contains many stem cells, which is the origin of the body’s immune and blood system. It is beneficial to bank the blood of a newborn baby’s umbilical cord. Through stem cell transplants the baby or another family member’s life could be saved from future illnesses such as anemia, leukemia and metabolic storing disabilities as well as certain generic immuno disabilities.

The possibility to withdraw stem cells from human embrio’s and to grow them is more useable because it has more treatment possibilities.

With the birth of Dolly the sheep, communities strongly expressed their concern about the possibility that a new cloning technique such as the replacement of the core of a cell will be used in human reproduction. Embryonic splitting and core replacement are two well known techniques that are associated with the cloning process.

I differentiate between reproductive cloning – to create a cloned human embryo with the aim to bring about a pregnancy of a child that is identical to another individual – and therapeutically cloning – to create a cloned human embryo for research purposes and for healing human illnesses.

Worldwide people are debating whether to proceed with therapeutical cloning. There are people for and against it. The biggest ethical objection against therapeutical cloning is the termination of the development of a potential human being.

Children born from cloning will differ from each other. Factors such as the uterus environment and the environment in which the child is growing up will play a role. Cloning create unique children that will grow up to be unique individuals, just like me and you that will develop into a person, just like you and me. If we understand this scientific fact, most arguments against human cloning will disappear.

Infertility can be treated through in vitro conception. This process does not work for everyone. For some cloning is a revolutionary treatment method because it is the only method that does not require patients to produce sperm and egg cells. The same arguments that were used against in vitro conception in the past are now being used against cloning. It is years later and in vitro cloning is generally applied and accepted by society. I am of the opinion that the same will happen with regard to human cloning.

There is an argument that cloning must be prohibited because it is unsafe. Distorted ideas in this regard were proven wrong. Are these distorted ideas justified to question the safety of cloning and the cloning process you may ask. The answer, according to me, is a definite no. Human cloning does have many advantages. That includes assistance with infertility, prevention of Down Syndrome and recovery from leukemia.

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept