Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
01 November 2023 | Story Valentino Ndaba | Photo SUPPLIED
Dr Prince Sarpong
Dr Prince Sarpong, Senior Lecturer in the School of Financial Planning Law at the University of the Free State.

As we deepen our understanding of the connection between money and psychology, financial therapy has gained popularity as a field of study. During World Mental Health Awareness Month, it was essential to delve into practical guidance for financial therapists, as well as for financial planners and mental health practitioners who are integrating financial therapy into their practice.

Dr Prince Sarpong, Senior Lecturer in the School of Financial Planning Law (SFPL) at the University of the Free State, and Prof Liezel Alsemgeest, Director of the SFPL, recently edited and published a book titled: Perspectives in Financial Therapy. Other academics from the SFPL who contributed to the book include Dr Rika van Zyl (Senior Lecturer) and Henda Kleingeld (Lecturer). 

Perspectives in Financial Therapy 

Published in July 2023, Perspectives in Financial Therapy aims to contribute to the body of knowledge in financial therapy. Both academics and practitioners in the mental health, financial planning, and related fields recognise the increasing prevalence of money-related psychological distress.

According to the editors, the primary target audience for this 14-chapter book includes academics and practitioners in the fields of financial therapy, financial planning, financial counselling, financial coaching, and mental health, as well as undergraduate and graduate students in these fields.

Mental well-being and financial matters

In Chapter One, Dr Sarpong begins by taking a close look at the developing field of financial therapy. He then investigates Models, Resources, and Tools Applied in Financial Therapy in Chapter Four. In this chapter, Dr Sarpong provides discussions on “the identified money scripts and money disorders in financial therapy, and on some of the main models, tools, and resources employed in financial therapy. The models in financial therapy are adapted mainly from the broader field of psychology and financial planning and can be employed by financial planners, financial therapists, and mental health professionals in helping clients to resolve their money-related distresses”.

Understanding generational differences is a crucial part of financial therapy. in Chapter Seven, Prof Alsemgeest touches on how each of the generations develops and distinguishes itself from other generations through shared social and historical life experiences. She added, “The chapter stresses that in the practice of financial therapy, it is important for practitioners to understand how each generation’s attitudes, perceptions, and behaviours around money were shaped, in order to be able to create rapport with a diverse group of clients.”

Comprehensive perspective on financial therapy

The book also delves into various other topics, including the brain and financial decision-making; practical application of neuroeconomics in financial planning; decolonising assessments in financial therapy from an African context; challenges, benefits, and implications for online financial therapy; couples and financial therapy; planning for and surviving divorce; rebuilding a stable emotional and financial foundation after divorce; therapeutic jurisprudence and estate planning; the limitations on freedom of testation, allaying estate planning fears through trusts; as well as a critical appraisal financial therapy.

News Archive

Middle East activists speak about peace on the Bloemfontein Campus
2012-03-15

 

Bassem Eid (left) and Benjamin Pogrund discuss the situation in the Middle East.
Photo: Johan Roux
15 March 2012

Peace is a big word in the Middle East, particularly amongst Israelis and Palestinians. After years of conflict, people yearn for peace; they want an end to the killings and the uncertainty. The problem is that both sides are actively doing things that undermine the prospect of peace. There is also double talk, lies and evasion with each side pointing fingers. This was the word from Benjamin Pogrund, an Israeli peace activist, addressing staff and students on the Bloemfontein Campus of the University of the Free State. He and fellow peace activist Bassem Eid, a Palestinian, visited the campus to speak about the situation in the Middle East.

Both men agreed that peace efforts were hindered by the Israeli and the Palestinian leaders. According to Pogrund, neither the Palestinians, nor the Israelis are leading the way in accepting that the conflict must end.
 
“Both Israeli and Palestinian leaders say let us get together with no pre-conditions. Then the Israeli leaders say, Jerusalem we cannot share, that is not for negotiation. And, they say to the Palestinians you must recognise Israel as a Jewish state. So, what they say is unless you agree to these pre-conditions there can be no talks without pre-conditions.
 
“And the Palestinians in turn say the settlement construction must cease immediately, and unless that happened, there is no point in meeting. And they say we will never acknowledge you as a Jewish state so do not even bother talking about it. And we insist on the right of return of Palestinian refugees. So they also say unless you acknowledge these pre-conditions there is no point in meeting with our pre-conditions. So as you can gather each side blames the other side, each side points the finger and says you are responsible for the lack of progress.”
 
Pogrund said both the Israelis and the Palestinians could demand legitimacy in that part of the world.
 
“Both Jewish and Arabs can say we have history on our side. We have religion on our side, culture.”
 
To compare Israel to Apartheid South Africa is wrong, he said.
 
“It is an occupation, it is repression, but it is not Apartheid.”
 
Eid, who is the director of the Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group, said the Palestinians were close to having a complete independent Palestinian state from 1994 to 1999.
 
“But in one rocket former Israeli Prime minister Ariel Sharon destroyed it.”
 
He said Israel’s disengagement from the Gaza Strip in 2005 did not bring political unity.
 
“We, the Palestinians, were supposed to start building the infrastructure of the Gaza Strip but unfortunately Hamas started dancing on that Israeli disengagement and considered it as their own success because of their military resistance against the occupation.” He also said Hamas is satisfied with its hold in the Gaza Strip and Fatah is also very satisfied with its hold in the West Bank. According to Eid, it is convenient for the Israelis that the Palestinians are separated.

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept