Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
07 August 2024 | Story André Damons | Photo André Damons
Dr Alba du Toit
Dr Alba du Toit, Senior Lecturer in the Department of Sustainable Food Systems and Development, is leading the newly established Innovative ARC-DALLRD-UFS Agro-processing for Climate-smart Food System research chair at the UFS.

The Innovative Agro-processing for Climate-smart Food System research chair, one of four ARC-DALLRD-UFS research chairs recently established at the University of the Free State (UFS), will focus on innovative agro-processing technologies that could affect food and nutrition security. The chair’s work will also focus on improving food systems that can impact socioeconomic development.

In a concerted effort to address the challenges and effects of climate change in Southern Africa, the UFS, together with the Agricultural Research Council (ARC) and the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD), established four new research chairs within the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences (NAS).

The other research chairs are Climate Change and Agriculture, Agriculture Risk Financing and Sustainable Livestock Production and together with the Innovative Agro-processing for Climate-smart Food System research chair, and fall under the umbrella of climate change. They will also be part of the centre of excellence of the ARC and DALRRD on Climate Smart Agriculture.

Dr Alba du Toit, Senior Lecturer in the Department of Sustainable Food Systems and Development, will lead the Innovative Agro-processing for Climate-smart Food System research chair and says the chair allows researchers to dedicate their time and effort towards research. It consolidates expertise, resources, and facilities to strengthen the research team’s capacity and will have a strong foundation for sustainable development goals. The chair provides a hub for collaboration between the UFS, ARC and DALLRD to focus on regionally engaged research with maximum societal impact.

The chair, which officially started on 1 July, also allows researchers to do trans- and multi-disciplinary, relevant and cutting-edge research.

Nixtamalisation could transform the food system

“We believe that nixtamalisation could transform the food system. However, the consumer’s willingness to adopt and embrace new products and techniques is dependent on the success of the initiative.

“Thus, innovations in new product development must be consumer-led since the consumer is constantly evolving, making it imperative to understand consumer behaviour and motivations behind decision-making,” says Dr Du Toit.

The nixtamalisation process, she explains, is a multistep technique commonly employed in Mexico, Central America and the southern regions of the US to transform maize into food products. The nixtamalisation process alters the physicochemical, nutritional and sensory properties of maize products by increasing protein quality, improving the content of calcium, magnesium and potassium and reducing mycotoxin levels.”

According to Dr Du Toit, by using the principles of circular food design, they will develop products that could provide solutions and support the food system. It involves using processing technologies that could be applied and implemented by anyone with access to a basic kitchen.

“This would benefit rural farmers and communities, small-scale and emerging farmers to provide food for themselves and become economically active small business owners. We believed the right product could not only influence the food security and well-being of individual households but also stimulate entrepreneurial action, which could benefit the community and overcome barriers to make nixtamalisation an acceptable practice for all,” says Dr Du Toit.

Maize and sorghum

“Maize and sorghum are staple crops in South Africa that are not being utilised to their full potential. South Africa is well known for its maize production, and it is the staple for most of the population in the form of pap. However, the reliance on pap exaggerates the issues of food and nutrition insecurity because pap cooked from Super Maize Meal is deficient in nutrients and often consumed in isolation without diversification in the diet.

“Sorghum is another cereal crop that is climate-smart, drought-resistant and suited in South Africa’s arid and semi-arid areas, while it offers good nutritional value. However, most consumers are not familiar with the crop except for its application as an instant porridge.  Nixtamalisation is a process that could benefit consumers as maize and sorghum could be transformed into nutritious, safe meals directly from the farm to the fork,” explains Dr Du Toit.

Home-grown dried whole maize kernels, she continues, could be converted into safe and delicious meals in homes using basic equipment as it is widely and effectively done in Mexico by rural women. The research will determine if consumers would accept the process of nixtamalisation, whether the products would be acceptable, and if the nutritional value would be comparable to commercial products.

Some of the news consumer-acceptable products already developed, include maize chips, dehydrated phutu pap, and corndogs. Currently, the team is working on maize-milk, maize-milk frozen dessert and a custard tart. Maize products have the advantage of being lactose- and gluten-free and thus would appeal to consumers of plant-based products.

Societal impact

Dr Du Toit says she is excited about the societal impact this project will have on communities and the country and is hopeful that they will be able to influence policymakers and the industry to provide more nutritious staples that could be “game-changers” for the sake of society. She is looking forward to collaborating with DALRRD, the ARC and the grain industry to ensure that partnerships are strengthened and new opportunities are created for the staff and students.

Prof Wilna Oldewage-Theron, a Professor of Nutrition in the College of Human Sciences at Texas Tech University, will join the research chair next year as the co-leader. She has experience in community nutrition research in Africa, and her research interests include the factors contributing to household food insecurity and malnutrition in resource-poor communities. She will be focused on the nutritional benefits of soy for human health.

Prof Maryke Labuschagne, who is leading the NRF SARChI Chair in Diseases and Quality of Field Crops and who is passionate about impacting malnutrition, has been appointed as mentor for the chair.

News Archive

Middle East activists speak about peace on the Bloemfontein Campus
2012-03-15

 

Bassem Eid (left) and Benjamin Pogrund discuss the situation in the Middle East.
Photo: Johan Roux
15 March 2012

Peace is a big word in the Middle East, particularly amongst Israelis and Palestinians. After years of conflict, people yearn for peace; they want an end to the killings and the uncertainty. The problem is that both sides are actively doing things that undermine the prospect of peace. There is also double talk, lies and evasion with each side pointing fingers. This was the word from Benjamin Pogrund, an Israeli peace activist, addressing staff and students on the Bloemfontein Campus of the University of the Free State. He and fellow peace activist Bassem Eid, a Palestinian, visited the campus to speak about the situation in the Middle East.

Both men agreed that peace efforts were hindered by the Israeli and the Palestinian leaders. According to Pogrund, neither the Palestinians, nor the Israelis are leading the way in accepting that the conflict must end.
 
“Both Israeli and Palestinian leaders say let us get together with no pre-conditions. Then the Israeli leaders say, Jerusalem we cannot share, that is not for negotiation. And, they say to the Palestinians you must recognise Israel as a Jewish state. So, what they say is unless you agree to these pre-conditions there can be no talks without pre-conditions.
 
“And the Palestinians in turn say the settlement construction must cease immediately, and unless that happened, there is no point in meeting. And they say we will never acknowledge you as a Jewish state so do not even bother talking about it. And we insist on the right of return of Palestinian refugees. So they also say unless you acknowledge these pre-conditions there is no point in meeting with our pre-conditions. So as you can gather each side blames the other side, each side points the finger and says you are responsible for the lack of progress.”
 
Pogrund said both the Israelis and the Palestinians could demand legitimacy in that part of the world.
 
“Both Jewish and Arabs can say we have history on our side. We have religion on our side, culture.”
 
To compare Israel to Apartheid South Africa is wrong, he said.
 
“It is an occupation, it is repression, but it is not Apartheid.”
 
Eid, who is the director of the Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group, said the Palestinians were close to having a complete independent Palestinian state from 1994 to 1999.
 
“But in one rocket former Israeli Prime minister Ariel Sharon destroyed it.”
 
He said Israel’s disengagement from the Gaza Strip in 2005 did not bring political unity.
 
“We, the Palestinians, were supposed to start building the infrastructure of the Gaza Strip but unfortunately Hamas started dancing on that Israeli disengagement and considered it as their own success because of their military resistance against the occupation.” He also said Hamas is satisfied with its hold in the Gaza Strip and Fatah is also very satisfied with its hold in the West Bank. According to Eid, it is convenient for the Israelis that the Palestinians are separated.

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept