Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
28 June 2024 | Story André Damons | Photo André Damons
Prof Victor Houliston
Prof Victor Houliston, Research Professor in the Department of English, is an A-rated researcher at the University of the Free State (UFS).

The University of the Free State (UFS) has added another National Research Foundation (NRF) A1-rated researcher to its ranks with the appointment of Prof Victor Houliston, Research Professor in the Department of English. This brings the number of the university’s A1-rated researchers to three.

The university also boasts the first A2 rating in the field of arts in the person of Prof Willem Boshoff, a senior professor in the Department of Fine Arts within the Faculty of The Humanities and one of South Africa's foremost contemporary artists. The other scholars with an A1 rating are Prof Maxim Finkelstein, the distinguished Professor at the Department of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, and Prof Melanie Walker, Distinguished Research Professor and National Research Foundation (NRF) Chair in Higher Education and Human Development.

The A rating is for researchers regarded as world leaders in their fields. Prof Houliston received his rating in 2022 – three years after retiring from the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits).

Consistent research output

Prof Houliston, who is an authority on early modern British and Irish Catholic studies (religion and politics) and has also published on John Donne (especially his prose works and sermons) and Renaissance rhetoric, says there is no formula for receiving an A1 rating.

“The definition of an A-rated scholar is someone who has achieved a certain reputation in their field internationally. That comes from a consistent research output, building up a portfolio of work in a particular field and moving the debate along, so that you become the go-to person on that subject.

“There is that sense of focus and some shifting of the picture or debate or understanding in your field. In science, the evaluation of a person's standing is more straightforward; in the humanities, research has a more subjective element so one's work is more vulnerable to criticism. In my case, as my research has evolved from English literature into historical studies, it has entailed archival and linguistic groundwork which makes it a little more objective,” says Prof Houliston.

The importance of Robert Persons

It is hard to say whether he chose his specialism, or his specialism chose him: an unexpected request for help from Guy Butler in 1988 led to his investigating the life and career of Robert Persons, an English Jesuit from the time of Queen Elizabeth I. Over the intervening 30 years, this Catholic activist has become widely recognised as one of the most important figures in early modern European history.

Prof Houliston started with a re-interpretation of Persons' published works, culminating in a 2007 monograph, Catholic Resistance in Elizabethan England. He is now editing Persons' extensive multilingual correspondence, as the leader of an international team of experts. The second volume was published earlier this year, with a third in preparation. He is also working with a team of South African classicists to translate Persons' Latin publications.

"As with most research, we work from the known to the unknown, pushing back further into the primary material – the archive."

Prof Houliston says that as a researcher, one must jealously guard one's time, which is difficult because the demands of teaching and administration have become more burdensome. Most academics show great commitment and idealism when it comes to teaching, so they are reluctant to leave students to their own devices. Ironically, this often leads those who are on the A-rating trajectory to take refuge in specialised institutes or centres of excellence and stop teaching, which can be a loss to students.

Given space to do research 

“Lecturers at a university such as the UFS, with its goal of increasing its research productivity, need space to do research. Bureaucracy may have to retract a bit. Lecturers themselves have to learn where to draw the line,” he says.

"This may appear selfish, but it enhances the learning environment. If you were to ask students if they preferred to be in a university where high-quality research is taking place, they would likely say, 'Yes. That gives my degree greater credibility. I would want to feel that those who are teaching me are contributing to the increase of knowledge’.”

His advice to emerging researchers is to follow the advice of Stephen Covey, author of The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People: conduct a weekly review of how they are managing to integrate research into their daily life as academics. Most lecturers are in a position where they only do research during vacations, but they can challenge themselves to carve out more regular times for research.

No slowing down

“That idea of constant review is important so that you are always moving forward. Many people just give up, because research is more challenging than, say, answering your emails, and you need energy and time. So, if you can reduce that start-up cost by doing a little every day, and preferably at the beginning of every day, it will make all the difference.

“The UFS, and especially heads of departments, can help to create a culture where scholars and researchers feel part of an interactive community. We need to move beyond the system to a sense of vocation. We have a vocation as university lecturers, professors and scholars, and everything else is secondary to the pursuit of knowledge. The system is merely a tool,” says Prof Houliston.

With multiple large-scale research projects on the go, as well as workshops and writing retreats, he is now busier than ever, with no plans for slowing down. He says: “I recently hosted a workshop for colleagues planning to apply for rating, to optimise their applications. One of my briefs is to enhance the research communities within the English department and the Faculty of Humanities in general, and especially amongst younger researchers.”

You could say he is speeding up. He recently completed a master’s degree in creative writing. "It's never too late to discover how many bad writing habits I have developed over the years!" 

News Archive

What did they learn at Stanford University?
2015-11-04

    

Members of the cohort with the
Vice-Chancellor and Rector of the UFS,
Prof Jonathan Jansen

Every year, since 2012, six second-year Kovsies are selected to take part in the elite Stanford Sophomore College Programme at the prestigious Stanford University in the United States. The University of the Free State and Oxford University are the only non-Stanford members of this exclusive course.

From 31 August to 15 September 2015, Farzaana Adam, Cornel Vermaak, Precious Mokwala, Tristan Van Der Spuy, Anje Venter, and Naushad Mayat undertook a three-week long academic exploration of multidisciplinary topics. These students attended seminars aligned with their respective fields of study from which they accumulated a wealth of knowledge.

This year’s cohort reflects on what they learned at Stanford University:

The significance of analyzing technology

One of the key points gathered by Farzaana Adam from the seminar, ‘Great Ideas in Computer Science’, was the necessity not to approach technology at face value. “Computer science goes beyond the technological products and social networks. By analysing the concepts underlying these technologies, many discoveries which have benefitted many fields of study have been made possible.”

Critical thinking in Arts and Science


“By combining different fields of study, one can obtain a greater perspective on the relevant fields,” said Cornel Vermaak, about what he garnered from a seminar titled ‘An Exploration of Art Materials: An intersection between the Arts and Science’. “This greater perspective enables one to evaluate problems critically,” he added.

Visual media substitutes oral narratives

“We were also taught different ways in which to interpret images, and how images influence society. Photography is a way to tell a story without actually having to say anything,” reflected Precious Mokwala, on ‘Photography: truth or fiction’

A lesson in business economics


Tristan Van Der Spuy received pointers pertaining to the stock exchange market    in ‘A Random Walk Down Wall Street’. “We looked at stock markets, and what influenced the stock prices of multiple companies, taking note of what should be looked at when investing in a company.”

Race relations and representation

‘The New Millenium Mix: Crossings between Race and Culture’ exposed Anje Venter to a global perspective on identity. “We explored the new generation of people that have mixed races and cultures, and how they are depicted in media and art.  We analysed the discrepancies and stereotypes of these depictions through film, novel, and short story studies, as well as through field trips to museums and art exhibitions.”

Overcoming the HIV/AIDS endemic


Naushad Mayat realised that “more teamwork and transparency between governments, chemists, social workers, and clinicians will be required for us to stem the flow [of HIV/AIDS],” in view of what he learned in a seminar on ‘HIV/AIDS: A Response to the AIDS Epidemic in the Bay Area’. “It is a daunting task. For the current generation of youth to tackle this epidemic now, we must stand together and be counted,” he added.



We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept