Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
11 April 2025 | Story Martinette Brits | Photo Supplied
Italian Design Day Competition Winners
National student competition winners, UFS's Gustav Pretorius and Jeanré Erasmus, pictured with Matteo Cibic and Michele Gialdroni, Director of the Italian Cultural Institute.

Two talented Architecture students from the University of the Free State (UFS), Jeanré Erasmus and Gustav Pretorius, have achieved national acclaim by winning the prestigious Italian Design Day 2025 Competition held in Pretoria. Their innovative exhibition space, inspired by The Dancer -  a dynamic ceramic sculpture by renowned South African artist Andile Dyalvane – captivated the judging panel and emerged victorious from among 45 entries submitted by 140 students from across South Africa.

 

Passion meets purpose 

For Erasmus, now in his third year of Architecture and working part-time at Soleil Architects, the path to this milestone began at an early age. “Ever since I was little, I’ve been obsessed with building things,” he recalls. His fascination with design and problem-solving naturally evolved into a passion for architecture, and he credits the UFS for providing a nurturing environment where both his technical skills and creative thinking could flourish. 

He credits his lecturers and peers for constantly challenging his ideas and pushing him towards excellence. He highlights the impact of former lecturer Martie Bitzer in shaping his journey. “We have an amazing, talented, and kind lecturer in Martie Bitzer, who has a big heart for architecture and her students,” he says. 

Pretorius, a fourth-year student, shares a similar drive. His design philosophy is deeply rooted in human experience and storytelling – an approach that played a key role in their winning design. “For me, architecture is not only about the physical form –  it is about how people interact with and move through space,” he explains. He believes their studies at UFS prepared them well to take on real-world challenges, equipping them with both conceptual depth and technical precision. 

 

Designing the story 

The Italian Design Day 2025 Competition, held on 24 February 2025 in Pretoria, tasked students with designing an exhibition space that captured the whimsical and narrative-rich aesthetic of renowned Italian designer Matteo Cibic. Instead of simply showcasing objects, the brief called for storytelling through design. 

Erasmus and Pretorius rose to the challenge by creating a space that echoed the movement and transformation embodied in Dyalvane’s The Dancer. “We didn’t want to use the static display cases,” explained Erasmus. “We designed the space that guided visitors through an interactive journey, rooted in the idea of shaping and refining - mirroring the movement and storytelling embedded in Dyalvane’s clay sculpture.”

Their concept impressed a panel of esteemed judges that included architects, Fanele Zondi and Braam de Villiers, and Stefania Iuliano, Commercial Attaché at the Italian Embassy in Pretoria. The panel’s combined expertise ensured a thorough evaluation of creativity, innovation, and spatial storytelling.

 

Overcoming creative challenges 

Developing a design that balanced imaginative expression with practical execution was no easy task.  “Picture two architecture students staring at a blank page late at night, questioning their life choices,” Erasmus jokes. One of the greatest challenges was translating a deeply emotional concept into a physical space - but through teamwork and continuous refinement, they achieved a balance between form and function.

“Like any great duo – Batman and Robin, peanut butter and jelly, architecture and last-minute deadlines – we balanced each other out,” Erasmus adds. Pretorius agrees, noting that their shared technical mindset kept the design process grounded in feasibility while still allowing room for creativity. Their ability to combine conceptual innovation with structural logic ultimately set their entry apart.

 

A milestone moment

When Erasmus received the call announcing their win, the moment was surreal. “It was a mix of shock and excitement, with a little bit of ‘Wait, is this a prank?’” he says. Although initially sworn to secrecy, the pair struggled to contain their excitement. “We didn’t exactly stick to that rule,” Erasmus admits with a laugh. 

Beyond the accolade, this experience has been transformative. “This experience has been like a masterclass in storytelling through space,” says Pretorius. “It reminded us that architecture is not just about buildings – it is about making people feel something.”

Looking ahead, both students are eager to continue exploring the narrative potential of architecture. Erasmus is particularly interested in how design intersects with various forms of artistic expression, while Pretorius plans to focus on sustainable and experiential design. They agree that the competition has reinforced their belief in architecture as a powerful tool for storytelling and human connection.

 

The winning exhibition space:

News Archive

The TRC legitimised apartheid - Mamdani
2010-07-20

 Prof. Mahmood Mamdani
“The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) accepted as legitimate the rule of law that undergirded apartheid. It defined as crime only those acts that would have been considered criminal under the laws of apartheid.”

This statement was made by the internationally acclaimed scholar, Prof. Mahmood Mamdani, when he delivered the Africa Memorial Lecture at the University of the Free State (UFS) last week on the topic: Lessons of Nuremberg and Codesa: Where do we go from here?

“According to the TRC, though crimes were committed under apartheid, apartheid itself – including the law enforced by the apartheid state – was not a crime,” he said.

He said the social justice challenges that South Africa faced today were as a result of the TRC’s failure to broaden the discussion of justice beyond political to social justice.

He said it had to go beyond “the liberal focus on bodily integrity” and acknowledge the violence that deprived the vast majority of South Africans of their means of livelihood.

“Had the TRC acknowledged pass laws and forced removals as constituting the core social violence of apartheid, as the stuff of extra-economic coercion and primitive accumulation, it would have been in a position to imagine a socio-economic order beyond a liberalised post-apartheid society,” he said.

“It would have been able to highlight the question of justice in its fullness, and not only as criminal and political, but also as social.”

He said the TRC failed to go beyond the political reconciliation achieved at Codesa and laid the foundation for a social reconciliation. “It was unable to think beyond crime and punishment,” he said.

He said it recognised as victims only individuals and not groups, and human rights violations only as violations of “the bodily integrity of an individual”; that is, only torture and murder.

“How could this be when apartheid was brazenly an ideology of group oppression and appropriation? How could the TRC make a clear-cut distinction between violence against persons and that against property when most group violence under apartheid constituted extra-economic coercion, in other words, it was against both person and property?”, he asked.

“The TRC was credible as performance, as theatre, but failed as a social project”.

Prof. Mamdani is the Director of the Institute of Social Research at the Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda; and the Herbert Lehman Professor of Government in the Department of Anthropology at the Columbia University in New York, USA.

Media Release
Issued by: Mangaliso Radebe
Assistant Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2828
Cell: 078 460 3320
E-mail: radebemt@ufs.ac.za  
20 July 2010
 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept