Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
19 August 2025 | Story Martinette Brits
Dr Tlou Raphela-Masuku
Dr Tlou Raphela-Masuku, Senior Lecturer in the UFS Disaster Management Training and Education Centre for Africa (DiMTEC), was selected as one of 15 early-career researchers from Southern and Eastern Africa to join the British Academy-funded International Writing Workshop on Climate Change Adaptation.

Dr Tlou Raphela-Masuku, Senior Lecturer in the University of the Free State (UFS) Disaster Management Training and Education Centre for Africa (DiMTEC), has been selected as one of only 15 early-career researchers from Southern and Eastern Africa to participate in the prestigious British Academy-funded International Writing Workshop on Climate Change Adaptation.

Her selection follows a highly competitive process involving applicants from across the region, underscoring her growing influence in climate research. “Being selected as one of only 15 early-career researchers from the SADC and East Africa region was truly humbling. It affirmed the value of my research and passion for climate adaptation and further motivated me to keep making a meaningful contribution in this field,” she said.

 

Strengthening research visibility and collaboration

The workshop is jointly organised by York St John University (UK), the University of the West of England (UK), the University of Nairobi (Kenya), and the University of Cape Town (South Africa). It brings together emerging scholars from a range of disciplinary backgrounds to foster interdisciplinary collaboration, strengthen academic writing and publishing skills, and develop grant proposal expertise.

For Dr Raphela-Masuku, the programme is a natural fit with her work at DiMTEC. “At DiMTEC, my work spans ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. I am the core teacher for this module for master’s students. My recent and upcoming research, including work on flood risks and climate vulnerability among subsistence farmers, directly aligns with the themes of the workshop,” she explained.

Her focus within the programme will be on climate-induced vulnerabilities and resilience, particularly in rural and peri-urban communities, with a strong emphasis on extreme weather events and nature-based solutions. She looks forward to both the online and in-person engagements in Nairobi and Cape Town, which will run between 2025 and 2027. “These offer a fantastic opportunity for peer learning, mentorship, and deeper engagement with fellow climate researchers. Exchanging ideas face to face is always energising and often leads to lasting collaborations,” she said.

 

Advancing DiMTEC’s mission

Participation in the workshop will not only advance Dr Raphela-Masuku’s own academic profile but also strengthen DiMTEC’s regional and continental footprint. “My participation directly supports DiMTEC’s mission to build climate resilience and disaster preparedness across Africa. It strengthens our footprint in the region and facilitates collaboration with other institutions working on similar challenges, especially in rural vulnerability and adaptation,” she noted.

She sees the experience as a vital platform to amplify her work on flood resilience and the health impacts of climate change to audiences that include academics, policymakers, and practitioners. “The workshop will enhance the visibility of my work and provide the tools and strategies to navigate high-impact publishing, which is crucial for emerging African scholars,” she added.

Reflecting on her journey, Dr Raphela-Masuku said it has been “rooted in both academic enquiry and real-world impact”, driven by the urgent need to support vulnerable communities. Her advice to aspiring researchers is clear: “Stay curious. Stay rooted in the needs of your communities. And don’t be afraid to ask hard questions or chase ambitious goals. Climate adaptation research is not just about publishing papers – it’s about finding real solutions for real people.”

News Archive

UFS study shows playing time in Super Rugby matches decreasing
2016-12-19

Description: Super Rugby playing time Tags: Super Rugby playing time 

The study by Riaan Schoeman, (left), Prof Robert Schall,
and Prof Derik Coetzee from the University of the Free State
on variables in Super Rugby can provide coaches with
insight on how to approach the game.
Photo: Anja Aucamp

It is better for Super Rugby teams not to have the ball, which also leads to reduced overall playing time in matches.

This observation is from a study by the University of the Free State on the difference between winning and losing teams. Statistics between 2011 and 2015 show that Super Rugby winning teams kick more and their defence is better.

These statistics were applied by Riaan Schoeman, lecturer in Exercise and Sport Sciences, Prof Derik Coetzee, Head of Department: Exercise and Sport Sciences, and Prof Robert Schall, Department of Mathematics and Actuarial Sciences. The purpose of the study, Changes in match variables for winning and losing teams in Super Rugby from 2011 to 2015, was to observe changes. Data on 30 games (four from each team) per season, supplied by the Cheetahs via Verusco TryMaker Pro, were used.

About two minutes less action
“We found that the playing time has decreased. This is the time the ball is in play during 80 minutes,” says Schoeman. In 2011, the average playing time was 34.12 minutes and in 2015 it was 31.95.

“The winning team has less possession of the ball and doesn’t want it. They play more conservatively. They dominate with kicks and then they play,” says Prof Coetzee, who was the conditioning coach for the Springboks in 2007 when they won the World Cup.

Lineouts also more about kicking
As a result, the number of line-outs also increased (from 0.31 per minute in 2011 to 0.34 in 2015) and the winning teams are better in this regard.

“The winning team has less possession of the ball
and doesn’t want it. They play a more conservative
game. They dominate with kicks and then they play.”

Schoeman believes that rule changes could also have contributed to reduced playing time, since something like scrum work nowadays causes more problems. “When a scrum falls, the time thereafter is not playing time.”

According to Prof Coetzee, rucks and mauls have also increased, (rucks from 2.08 per minute in 2011 to 2.16 in 2015 and mauls from 0.07 per minute in 2011 to 0.10 in 2015). “The teams that win, dominate these areas,” he says.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept