Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
11 December 2019 | Story Leonie Bolleurs
Aids read more

According to Global Statistics, there were approximately 37,9 million people across the globe with HIV/Aids in 2018. They also state that in 2018, an estimated 1,7 million individuals worldwide became newly infected with HIV. 

In the city of Masvingo, Zimbabwe, Claris Shoko is a Statistics lecturer at the Great Zimbabwe University. In her PhD thesis at the University of the Free State (UFS) in the Department of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, she presented the argument that the inclusion of both the CD4 cell count and the viral-load counts in the monitoring and management of HIV+ patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART), is helping in reducing mortality rates, leading to improved life expectancy for HIV/Aids patients. 

She received her doctoral degree at the December UFS Graduation Ceremonies, with her thesis: Continuous-time Markov modelling of the effects of treatment regimens on HIV/Aids immunology and virology. 

CD4 cell count and viral-load count

Dr Shoko explains: “When the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) enters the human body, the virus attacks the CD4 cells in their blood. This process damages CD4 cells, causing the number of white blood cells in the body to drop, making it difficult to fight infections.”

“Clinical markers such as CD4 cell count and viral-load count (number of HIV particles in a ml of blood) provide information about the progression of HIV/Aids in infected individuals. These markers fully define the immunology and the virology of HIV-infected individuals, thereby giving us a clear picture of how HIV/Aids evolve within an individual.”

Dr Shoko continues: “The development of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has helped substantially to reduce the death rate from HIV. HAART reduces viral load-count levels, blocking replication of HIV particles in the blood, resulting in an increase of CD4 cell counts and the life expectancy of individuals infected with HIV. This has made CD4 cell counts and viral-load counts the fundamental laboratory markers that are regularly used for patient management, in addition to predicting HIV/Aids disease progression or treatment outcomes.”

In the treatment of HIV/Aids, medical practitioners prescribe combination therapy to attack the virus at different stages of its life cycle, and medication to treat the opportunistic infections that may occur. “The introduction of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) has led to the dramatic reduction in morbidity and mortality at both individual level and population level,” states Dr Shoko.

Once HIV-positive patients are put on cART, the effectiveness of treatment is monitored after the first three months and a further follow-up is done every six months thereafter. During the monitoring stages, CD4 cell count and viral load is measured. Patients are also screened for any tuberculosis (TB) co-infection and checked for any signs of drug resistance. These variables determine whether or not there is a need for treatment change. 

She continues: “Previous studies on HIV modelling could not include both CD4 cell count and viral load in one model, because of the collinearity between the two variables. In this study, the principal component approach for the treatment of collinearity between variables is used. Both variables were then included in one model, resulting in a better prediction of mortality than when only one of the variables is used.”

“Viral-load monitoring helps in checking for any possibilities of virologic failure or viral rebound, which increases the rate of mortality if not managed properly. CD4 cell count then comes in to monitor the potential development of opportunistic infections such as TB. TB is extremely fatal, but once detected and treated, the survival of HIV/Aids patients is assured,” Dr Shoko explains.

Markov model

She applied the Markov model in her study. The model, named after the Russian mathematician Andrey Markov, represents a general category of stochastic processes, characterised by six basic attributes: states, stages, actions, rewards, transitions, and constraints. 

According to Dr Shoko, Markov models assume that a patient is always in one of a finite number of discrete states, called Markov states. All events are modelled as transitions from one state to another. Each state is assigned a utility, and the contribution of this utility to the overall prognosis depends on the length of time spent in each state. For example, for a patient who is HIV positive, these states could be HIV+ (CD4 cell count above 200 cells/mm3), Aids (CD4 cell count below 200 cells/mm3) and Dead.

“Markov models are ideal for use in HIV/Aids studies, because they estimate the rate of transition between multiple-disease states while allowing for the possible reversibility of some states,” says Dr Shoko, quoting Hubbard and Zhou.

“Relatively fewer HIV modelling studies include a detailed description of the dynamics of HIV viral load count during stages of HIV disease progression. This could be due to the unavailability of data on viral load, particularly from low- and middle-income countries that have historically relied on monitoring CD4 cell counts for patients on ART because of higher costs of viral load-count testing,” Dr Shoko concludes

News Archive

Reaction by the Rector of the UFS after a meeting with student leaders
2008-02-25

Reaction by the Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS, Prof. Frederick Fourie, on the agreement reached at a meeting with student leaders held on Friday, 22 February 2008

Note: This is meant to be used together with the full joint statement that was issued by the UFS management and student leaders on 22 February 2008.

The memorandum of the primes of the University of the Free State’s (UFS) residences was handed to top management on Wednesday, 20 February 2008. In the memorandum they asked for a meeting with the UFS management by Friday, 22 February 2008. Such a meeting was arranged and took place.

The UFS top management, all the residence primes as well as the house committee member for first years, the executive of the Main Campus Student Representative Council (SRC) and residence heads were present.

In contrast to what is suggested in the Volksblad report of Saturday, the discussion went off very well. There was no consternation or shouting or “emotions that ran high”. It was a civilised, decent meeting as it should be at a good university. Of course, now and again individuals spoke out strongly and very enthusiastically, but it was all decent and orderly. The contribution of the primes was insightful and well formulated.

Because the top management and I wanted to listen very carefully what the problems and frustrations were, we spent nearly five hours in the meeting. The issues in the memorandum were discussed one by one. In some cases I could take a decision immediately and finalise the matter, in other cases, the management provided information that could largely finalise a matter. A number of other matters must be investigated further.

The management undertook to respond comprehensively and in writing to all the issues raised in the memorandum by Monday, 25 February 2008. This will be handed to the primes but will not be handed to the media beforehand.
It is obvious that there are matters at the university that can be better managed and that there are problems with communication within the Student Affairs division. A major change such as the new policy on diversity places huge demands on management and the administration, and problems were to be expected. However, we understand the frustration of the students in residences.

On the other hand, students don’t always make matters easier. The strong opposition of white student leaders last year, and their unwillingness to co-operate in preparation for 2008 is well known. This year it is going better. But often student leaders take positions that are very inflexible. They also see no room for adapting old habits and simply want their own way. Their contributions are then full of statements such as “It cannot be done”. This delays measures such as the full implementation of expert interpreting services, which, for the management, is a very important measure (and which is functioning very well in certain residences). Communication from student leaders to management is also not always what it should be.

At the end of the meeting student leaders and management reached an important agreement and issued a joint statement in which they committed themselves to the integration process and to good co-operation and communication. This was an important step which is a sign of rebuilding trust. Naturally everyone will still have to work hard to build on this and to strengthen mutual trust.

The course and outcome of Friday’s discussions, as requested by the student leaders, show that issues can be addressed and resolved by means of us talking to one another. This is why it is so sad that primes and house committee members went on strike on Wednesday already and stayed in tents in front of the Main Building – leaving their residences without its leadership. This created an opening for what appears to have been well planned and co-ordinated acts of vandalism by inhabitants of residences on the campus on Wednesday.

Such vandalism is unacceptable and no one can justify it.

Fortunately, order could be restored quickly during the night and all academic activities could resume without any disruption on Thursday and Friday.

FCvN Fourie

Media Release
Issued by: Lacea Loader
Assistant Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2584
Cell: 083 645 2454
E-mail: loaderl.stg@ufs.ac.za   
24 February 2008

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept