Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
05 May 2022 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Unsplash
Quantity  Surveying and Construction management
The UFS Department of Quantity Surveying and Construction Management received the stamp of approval from SACQSP when it was fully accredited by this body for its course content.

The Department of Quantity Surveying and Construction Management in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences at the University of the Free State (UFS) remains a preferred destination for built-environment programmes.
 
It received full accreditation for the BSc Quantity Surveying Level 7 (undergraduate) and the BSc Quantity Surveying Level 8 (honours degree) from the South African Council for the Quantity Surveying Profession (SACQSP) for the period 2018-2022.

The Head of Department, Prof Kahilu Kajimo-Shakantu, says: “This is not only a validation that we are meeting and exceeding the minimum requirements set by SACQSP, but that as one of only five tertiary institutions offering degree courses with full accreditation in the country, we compete and are counted among the best of the best.”

She believes it is extremely important for the Department of Quantity Surveying and Construction Management to maintain its accreditation. The next accreditation visit is scheduled for 29 July 2022 for accreditation for the period 2023-2027. 

According to Pierre Oosthuizen, Lecturer in the department, both their residential and compact (formally distance) contact learning programmes – bachelor’s and honours degrees – received full accreditation. 

This achievement is also in line with the department’s vision of constantly striving to attain the highest level of quality and credibility; to always reflect an image of established principles in science practice. 

Valuable and accepted qualification

Oosthuizen continues, saying: “The main goal of the Quantity Surveying programme is to prepare competent and industry-ready professional candidates. With this stamp of approval from SACQSP, we are giving prospective and current students the assurance that the degrees presented by our department are recognised by the South African built environment as a relevant, valuable, and accepted qualification for the profession.”

“Graduates from accredited institutions also have a better chance of getting employment, and they can register as candidates with the council to become professional quantity surveyors,” adds Prof Kajimo-Shakantu.

Receiving accreditation for its degrees, the department improves its standing among peer institutions and industry stakeholders. Furthermore, it is in a favourable position to contribute to the South African government’s list of scarce skills with the quantity surveying, construction management, and property-related programmes it offers.

Of the most popular modules presented by the department is the compact (formally distance) contact learning programmes. These programmes also adhere to the requirements of the South African Qualification Authority (SAQA) and the National Qualification Framework (NQF). 

Oosthuizen states: “Accredited compact (formally distance) contact learning Quantity Surveying programmes are uncommon in South Africa. Our department is proud to have a stellar history of presenting Quantity Surveying programmes over the past 15 years to students who do not have the resources to attend classes on campus or who are working full time in the construction industry.” 

“The department is now also considering alternative entry routes via the UFS extended programme and the recognition of prior learning initiative,” Oosthuizen adds. 

According to Prof Kajimo-Shakantu, the department is also proud of the customised work-integrated learning modules it has introduced in its programme – effective 2021 – giving students better opportunities to link theory with industry/practice. “The value of the BSc programme called Construction Economics and Management (CEM) cannot be overemphasised, because it gives students the core knowledge of both Quantity Surveying and Construction Management. Students can decide which honours to do upon completion of the Quantity Surveying and Construction Management modules, thus helping to prepare the career readiness of our students early in their formative years.”

Allow students to fulfil their dreams

“Professional quantity surveyors play an undeniably crucial role in the construction industry, contributing to the physical, economic, and social environments,” says Oosthuizen. 

Adhering to a list of more than 19 accreditation criteria, including matters related to programme design, academic staffing, programme effectiveness, teaching and learning strategy, student assessment policies and procedures, and its assessment system, the department is fulfilling a valuable role in preparing candidate quantity surveying professionals for the South African and international built environment.

Besides the quality of its course content and processes, the department is also proud of the students it delivers. According to Prof Kajimo-Shakantu, several of their students received national recognition for their academic excellence as well as leadership potential, for example scooping up the prestigious Association of South African Quantity Surveyors (ASAQS) Gold Medal award a few times.

News Archive

Reaction by the Rector of the UFS after a meeting with student leaders
2008-02-25

Reaction by the Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS, Prof. Frederick Fourie, on the agreement reached at a meeting with student leaders held on Friday, 22 February 2008

Note: This is meant to be used together with the full joint statement that was issued by the UFS management and student leaders on 22 February 2008.

The memorandum of the primes of the University of the Free State’s (UFS) residences was handed to top management on Wednesday, 20 February 2008. In the memorandum they asked for a meeting with the UFS management by Friday, 22 February 2008. Such a meeting was arranged and took place.

The UFS top management, all the residence primes as well as the house committee member for first years, the executive of the Main Campus Student Representative Council (SRC) and residence heads were present.

In contrast to what is suggested in the Volksblad report of Saturday, the discussion went off very well. There was no consternation or shouting or “emotions that ran high”. It was a civilised, decent meeting as it should be at a good university. Of course, now and again individuals spoke out strongly and very enthusiastically, but it was all decent and orderly. The contribution of the primes was insightful and well formulated.

Because the top management and I wanted to listen very carefully what the problems and frustrations were, we spent nearly five hours in the meeting. The issues in the memorandum were discussed one by one. In some cases I could take a decision immediately and finalise the matter, in other cases, the management provided information that could largely finalise a matter. A number of other matters must be investigated further.

The management undertook to respond comprehensively and in writing to all the issues raised in the memorandum by Monday, 25 February 2008. This will be handed to the primes but will not be handed to the media beforehand.
It is obvious that there are matters at the university that can be better managed and that there are problems with communication within the Student Affairs division. A major change such as the new policy on diversity places huge demands on management and the administration, and problems were to be expected. However, we understand the frustration of the students in residences.

On the other hand, students don’t always make matters easier. The strong opposition of white student leaders last year, and their unwillingness to co-operate in preparation for 2008 is well known. This year it is going better. But often student leaders take positions that are very inflexible. They also see no room for adapting old habits and simply want their own way. Their contributions are then full of statements such as “It cannot be done”. This delays measures such as the full implementation of expert interpreting services, which, for the management, is a very important measure (and which is functioning very well in certain residences). Communication from student leaders to management is also not always what it should be.

At the end of the meeting student leaders and management reached an important agreement and issued a joint statement in which they committed themselves to the integration process and to good co-operation and communication. This was an important step which is a sign of rebuilding trust. Naturally everyone will still have to work hard to build on this and to strengthen mutual trust.

The course and outcome of Friday’s discussions, as requested by the student leaders, show that issues can be addressed and resolved by means of us talking to one another. This is why it is so sad that primes and house committee members went on strike on Wednesday already and stayed in tents in front of the Main Building – leaving their residences without its leadership. This created an opening for what appears to have been well planned and co-ordinated acts of vandalism by inhabitants of residences on the campus on Wednesday.

Such vandalism is unacceptable and no one can justify it.

Fortunately, order could be restored quickly during the night and all academic activities could resume without any disruption on Thursday and Friday.

FCvN Fourie

Media Release
Issued by: Lacea Loader
Assistant Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2584
Cell: 083 645 2454
E-mail: loaderl.stg@ufs.ac.za   
24 February 2008

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept