Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
19 October 2022 | Story Leonie Bolleurs
Dr Pieter du Toit
Dr Pieter du Toit, President of the Convocation, recently addressed more than 200 Convocation members at the Annual General Meeting.

What if you knew there was a body whose endeavours sought to be dynamic and engaging, promote excellence, welcome inclusion, and serve its alma mater?

One of the aims of the UFS Convocation – a body of more than 40 000 members – is to pay close attention to and engage on matters pertaining to governance, administration, and academic affairs at the University of the Free State (UFS).

This entity seeks to ensure that the research outputs of the university are communicated in a positive light, and that feedback is provided to ensure that the current academic programmes are adequate to enhance graduate employability. Among their goals is to provide a forum for unemployed graduates to share their skills, expertise, and abilities.

Furthermore, this body attempts to establish dialogue around social issues and ongoing transformation.

 

Fostering a spirit of belonging

According to Dr Pieter du Toit, President of the UFS Convocation, it is important for this structure that it stays relevant to its members and society and that it fosters a spirit of belonging. He recently addressed members on the UFS Bloemfontein Campus at the Annual General Meeting, the first to be held in the past two years. Besides the in-person attendance, the meeting was also attended by more than 200 members via livestream.

Dr Du Toit explained to members – which, according to legislation, include all persons who have obtained a formal qualification from the UFS, as well as all permanent academic staff members that the Convocation strives to promote a positive image of the UFS, advancing and safeguarding its reputation.

Also speaking at the AGM was the UFS Rector and Vice-Chancellor, Prof Francis Petersen. He reflected on the state of the UFS, talking about the past five years to date. He touched on matters pertaining to the core functions of the university, including teaching and learning, research and internationalisation, and engaged scholarship.

As stated in its vision, the UFS strives to be a research-led, student-centred, and regionally engaged university in Bloemfontein, the Free State, South Africa, and the continent.

In the past five years, the UFS’ framework of guidance has been the Integrated Transformation Plan, which endeavoured to emphasise social justice; the UFS Strategic Plan, the focus of which was to enhance the scope of transformation by following a holistic approach; and the Vice-Chancellor’s Strategic projects, aimed at creating a high-performance institution. “To be able to do what you need to do, you have to be at the top of your game,” said Prof Petersen.

In addition, the UFS has also been guided by the University Risk Management Committee and the Institutional Multi-stakeholder Group, which is a safe space that impacts the progression of an inclusive culture of belonging at the UFS.

Prof Petersen also referred to the 2020/2021 period during the COVID-19 pandemic. “There were three imperatives to which the UFS was committed during this period – the health and safety of staff and students, ensuring that no staff member or student was left behind, and successfully completing the 2020/2021 academic year,” stated Prof Petersen.

According to him, the university has engaged in different strategies to ensure that students were not left behind academically, and that committed staff did not overextend themselves. “We have dealt with it in such a way that our success rate for undergraduate studies has improved, which indicates the resilience of our students and the commitment of our staff,” he said.

The UFS is one of the nation's top universities for student success.

 

Optimising our research capacity

Two of the research successes of this year were an increase in research outputs and in the number of postgraduate students. The university is also working towards increasing the number of academic staff with PhDs, as well as its number of postdoctoral fellows. “We are looking at optimising our research capacity,” stated Prof Petersen.

Regarding engaged scholarship, Prof Petersen believes that if you cannot positively impact society through teaching and learning and research, you should ask why you exist as a university.

“We as a university is in a good place and I think you can be very proud of your alma mater,” he said.

For the way forward, the university is working on Vision130 (a strategy spanning over 12 years). “The vision will be quite bold, including goals for 75% of academic staff to have obtained their PhDs, a bigger focus on the postgraduate programme, and to be one of the top-five institutions in the country and one of the top-600 in the world. We will also reduce our student numbers to around 35 000, because we believe this is the number that we should be focusing on,” stated Prof Petersen.

“As members of the Convocation, I ask you to find a place in Vision130, to see how you can contribute to make this university a better institution than it is today,” he added.

Concluding his presentation, Prof Petersen told members of the Convocation, “You are immensely important to us as a university – you are the continuity between the past and the present as well as the future.”

Full-time UFS staff and alumni are welcome to contact the President of the Convocation with suggestions at convocation@ufs.ac.za

 

 

What is the Convocation?

  • It is important for the Convocation that it stays relevant to its members and society and that it fosters a spirit of belonging for alumni by keeping the communication channels with members open.
  • The Convocation strives to promote a positive image of the UFS, advancing and safeguarding its reputation.
  • The Convocation seeks to ensure that the research outputs of the university are communicated in a positive light, and that feedback is provided to ensure that the current academic programmes are adequate to enhance graduate employability.
  • Furthermore, this body attempts to establish dialogue around social issues and ongoing transformation.
  • In addition to promoting the institution's business and community interests, this structure aims to instil respect for the UFS.
  • Its goal is to instil in alumni a sense of responsibility, obligation, and accountability towards the community in general and to their alma mater in particular.

 Who is part of the Convocation?

  • All persons who have obtained a formal qualification from the UFS, as well as all permanent academic staff members.

 How often does the Convocation meet?

  • The Convocation sees to it that members meet at least once every two years.


News Archive

Professor launches his book, opposition parties attend
2011-03-22

Prof. Hussein Solomon
Photo: Stephen Collett

“We are good in opposing people, but we’re less good in opposing ideas.” This was how Prof. Jonathan Jansen, Vice-Chancellor and Rector of the University of the Free State (UFS) introduced the book launch of Against all Odds: Opposition Politics in Southern Africa.

The event was hosted in collaboration with the publisher under the title: Are opposition parties in South Africa in a crisis? This formed part of a series of dialogue sessions, organised by the Centre for Africa Studies, in the run up to the local elections.
 
Amongst those interested who attended the evening in the Senate Hall of the CR Swart Building on the Main Campus were various politicians, students, staff en a panel consisting of academics and the respective provincial representatives of the ANC and DA.
 
Dr Mcebisi Ndletyana from the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC), acted as arbiter.
 
Proff. Hussein Solomon, author of Against all Odds: Opposition Politics in Southern Africa, also lecturer at the UFS, as well as Dirk Kotzé, Head of the Department of Political Science at Unisa, delivered enriching lectures on the stance and positioning of opposition parties.
 
Prof. Hussein, who spoke first, circumscribed the context of the political climate in the country, based on his book. “The problem that political science encounters is that everybody becomes experts on the internet, while they have no experience of what is happening in South Africa.” He said that when political parties in the country are under discussion, voters often allow myths and/or stereotyping to influence their concept of it. ‘’If there are no opposition parties, there is no democracy and people are deprived of their vote.”
 
Prof. Kotzé stated in his speech that it was not only opposition parties who had to make the government watch its step, but also the status that the country acquired, amongst others, from its connections, i.e. collaborative agreements such as BRICSA and the country’s inclusion in the G20. He left the audience with a question about how they were going to become involved in politics, and with his rhetoric question referred to options like social networks and movements.
 
Mr Sibongile Besani, the ANC'S secretary in the Free State, said the DA grew due to it’s swallowing of other parties; something he claims is taking the country backwards. He also described the use of personalities by opposition parties as means of association a weakness. He added that voters will continue voting for the ANC because they can associate themselves with the party’s vision.
 
In contrast, Mr Roy Jankielsohn, provincial leader of the DA, said voters and parties unite under their core vision for the country as like in the case of the ANC during the liberation struggles.
 
During the question-and-answer session, which followed after Mr Jankielson’s speech, Prof. Kwandiwe Kondlo, upon completion and summary of the discussions, stated firmly that the opposition parties are in a crisis. “The start of the solution is to recognise the problem. That is why our democracy finds itself in the state in which it is; because the opposition does not fulfil the role that they are supposed to fulfil.“ Prof. Kondlo is the head of the Centre of Africa Studies at the UFS.
 
He concluded by stating that the economic basis in the country was not transformed. “We cannot say that people determine their futures if they posses nothing. Opposition parties must start to communicate at this level in order to table something new. Our democracy must become more inclusive at political and material level.”

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept