Words such as diversity, equality, and inclusion align with the idea of “leaving no student behind”, but do we genuinely grasp their significance? Moreover, when we state that inclusion is not merely a choice but a fundamental human right for individuals with disabilities, we must ask ourselves: do we grasp what this entails? Is simply having individuals with disabilities present in a space sufficient? What does authentic disability inclusion look like?
Recent observations highlight troubling interactions involving students with disabilities. In one instance, a blind student called out for assistance in a busy area, only to be met with indifference from bystanders who simply looked on without offering help. This raises a critical question: Are we concerned about the perceived burden of intervening, or do we harbour unfounded fears about the “contagion” of disability?
In another scenario, a group of students with disabilities attended a conference but went unrecognised as active participants. Their voices seemed muted, rendering them invisible within a space meant to celebrate diverse perspectives. This begs the question: Do we overlook the invaluable insights from those whose experiences differ from our own? Engaging with individuals from varied backgrounds enriches our understanding and opens the door to shared knowledge.
Questions raised about our understanding of inclusion
Further, a recent opinion piece and keynote address by prominent human rights figures praised the contributions of sign language interpreters, yet failed to recognise the Deaf community, the very group that tirelessly fought for the recognition of
South African Sign Language as an official language. This oversight raises important questions about our understanding of inclusion. Interpreters play a crucial role, acting as essential bridges that enable Deaf individuals to participate fully in society and the workforce. But should we applaud service providers for doing their jobs? Sign language interpreters are not entertainers or celebrities; they ought to be skilled language practitioners expected to offer a professional service in two languages. Their responsibility is to ensure effective communication between Deaf and hearing individuals.
Disheartening, despite the milestone of
official recognition for their language, the onus still seems to fall on hearing individuals to articulate the needs of the Deaf community. This perspective is particularly troubling when it comes from those who are positioned as human rights advocates. Are we truly honouring the autonomy and voices of the Deaf community, or are we inadvertently sidelining them in conversations about their own rights and needs?
These observations underscore a pressing need for greater awareness and empathy within our university and communities. We must acknowledge and celebrate the contributions of individuals with disabilities, ensuring their insights and perspectives are heard and respected in classes, meetings and conversations. In doing so, we create a more inclusive society, one that values and learns from the rich diversity of human experience.
Who it makes room for
Disability inclusion is essential for fostering true societal inclusivity, shifting perspectives from viewing people with disabilities as logistical challenges to recognising their human rights. Historically, individuals with disabilities have often felt tolerated rather than welcomed, resulting in superficial inclusion. Genuine inclusion entails creating environments where everyone can fully participate and feel valued. A just society’s measure is not only in its support for marginalised members but also in how it makes them feel.
Purposeful conversations like dialogues that encourage interaction between individuals with and without disabilities can break down stereotypes and build mutual understanding. Understanding the intersectionality of disability with race, gender, class, and sexuality supports disability justice. Personal stories highlight the nuances of nuances, prioritising dignity, accessibility, and the lived experiences of individuals with disabilities. The human-centric approach advocates for design standards that meet diverse needs and ensure their active participation in decision-making.
Disability inclusion that emphasises empathy and dignity requires us to move beyond mere compliance. A just society is measured by who it makes room for, and that is where real disability inclusion lies. So to quote Vernā Myers, a renowned diversity consultant, aptly states: “Diversity is being invited to the party, but inclusion is being asked to dance.”