Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
15 November 2024 | Story André Damons | Photo Supplied
Top from left: Dr Anand Krishnan, Dr Andronicus A. Akinyelu, and Dr Marieka Gryzenhout. Middle from left: Prof Yonas T Bahta, Prof Felicity Burt, and Prof Abiodun A Ogundeji. Bottom from left: Prof Charles Haddad and Prof Abdon Atangana

Scientists from the University of the Free State (UFS) have been recognised among the World’s Top 2% of Scientists for 2024, according to the recently released World’s Top 2% Scientists list by Stanford University. This list, compiled in partnership with Elsevier using data from Scopus, highlights researchers making significant contributions in their respective fields who are world-class.

The ranking recognises the most distinguished and influential scientists globally and is based on standardised citation parameters, h-index, co-author corrected hm-index, article citations based on author positions, as well as a composite indicator.

Prof Vasu Reddy, Deputy Vice-Chancellor for Research and Internationalisation says: “The coveted Stanford-Elsevier list showcases top-notch scholars globally in the fields of science, engineering, business, public affairs, and the human sciences. We at the UFS are filled with pride and excitement to see our scholars who are making a positive mark in global research efforts.”

Prof Abdon Atangana from the UFS Institute for Groundwater is again the highest-ranked scientist from the institution included in this list. He is ranked 391 in the world and second out of 2 1237 authors in the SubField (Applied Mathematics). Prof Karl Peltzer, Research Fellow in the Department Psychology, is ranked 4 806 in the world. He is ranked 47 out of 69 595 authors in the SubField 1 (Public Health).

Prof Reddy adds “The UFS is filled with immense inspiration and joy to celebrate our academics whose vision and dedication must serve as a true inspiration for all of us collectively at UFS. You are people, through your ideas and research, who drive real-world solutions to complex wicked problems and challenges.”

Newcomers

Prof Felicity Burt, Principal Medical Scientist in the Division of Virology at the National Health Laboratory Service and the UFS and current South African Research Chair (SARChI) in Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Pathogens Research; Prof Yonas T Bahta, Professor in the UFS Department of Agricultural Economics; Dr Andronicus Akinyelu, a lecturer of Computer Science and Informatics; Prof Abiodun A Ogundeji from Disaster Management Training and Education Centre for Africa (DiMTEC); and Dr Marieka Gryzenhout, Senior Lecturer in the Department of Genetics, were included in the prestigious list for the first time.

Dr Gryzenhout, who is rated 410 764 in the world and 578 out of 26 928 authors in the SubField 1 (Mycology & Parasitology), says her inclusion in the list is a surprise “because there are truly prolific and renowned researchers out there with impressive publication records and impactful research”.

She contributes her inclusion to impactful and relevant research that are cited over a long period of time. However, also networking, because often large research network-based publications draw high numbers of citations due to their impact and importance.

Dr Gryzenhout is researching various aspects of medicinal mushrooms, including psychedelic mushrooms, and biodiversity of fungi.

A remarkable achievement

Dr Anand Krishnan, Senior Lecturer in Chemical Pathology and affiliated to the Office of the Dean and Division of Public Health within the UFS Faculty of Health Sciences, says this prestigious acknowledgment reflects his extensive contributions to the field of nano diagnostic and therapeutic research, as well as his impressive scholarly output, which includes over 127 published articles, one patent filed eight books, and 22 book chapters, solidifying his status as a leading academic not only in South Africa but on the global stage.

Dr Krishnan, National Research Foundation (NRF) Y1-rated researcher who is ranked 218 468 in the world and 1 688 out of 148 458 in the SubField 1 (Pharmacology & Pharmacy), is one of only two South African researchers selected to co-author the latest guidelines for Extracellular Vesicles (EV) research published by the Journal of Extracellular Vesicles. Over a span of three years, he collaborated with 1 051 authors from 53 countries to create the document titled “Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles (MISEV2023): From Basic to Advanced Approaches”.

This comprehensive publication, released in February, aims to elevate EV research by providing standardised guidelines for the production, separation, and characterisation of EVs from various sources.

Dr Krishnan’s prolific publication record showcases his dedication to advancing scientific knowledge and establishes him as a leader in his field. Reflecting on his recognition, he expressed his pride and gratitude: “Being acknowledged in this elite group is a tremendous honour. It validates my commitment to advancing research in precision medicine and nano diagnostics, with a particular focus on extracellular vesicles, and highlights the significant contributions of my team at UFS. I am proud to represent South Africa on this international platform and to be part of a community dedicated to scientific excellence.”

Signifies global recognition

Prof Bahta, an astute National Research Foundation (NRF) C2-rated researcher, has been included on the prestigious list for the first time. He is ranked 229 449 globally and 1674 out of 81496 authors in the SubField 1 (Agronomy & Agriculture).

“I feel proud of myself for achieving this in a short period. I was employed at UFS in 2014 before I was in the industry, and this achievement is not only for me but for my fellow young researchers, for my department, and for my university. I think it is a good start to recognise my work to excel more. This achievement would not have been possible without the assistance of my postgraduate students (honours, Master’s, and PhDs).

“Being named in the Top 2% signifies global recognition for research excellence and enhances a scientist’s reputation within academia and industry. This distinction can open doors to increased funding, collaborations, and speaking opportunities at international conferences. Additionally, the ranking provides visibility across diverse disciplines, showcasing work that may otherwise remain underappreciated,” he says.

This is yet another recognition for Prof Bahta, who received a few international awards as well as being part of Sigma Xi (the Scientific Research Honour Society) and the International Research Scientist Awards (IRS).

Says Prof Bahta: “Specifically, my citations and aggressive publishing of scientific articles have put me in the picture. On average, I manage to publish 10-12 articles per year. For example, so far this year, I have published 13 scientific articles (two-three in the pipeline might be published this year), one conference proceedings’ article published, one chapter in a book in the final stage of publication and presenting my work in two international conferences with the alignment of Vision 130."

His current research involves a Water Research Commission (WRC) project (Project title: “Assessing the Social and Economic Impact of Changed Water Use Behaviour in Food Production in South Africa) and the Resilience of Commercial Livestock Farmers to Agricultural Drought in the Northern Cape province of South Africa”, which is sponsored by the UFS.

Collaboration with international colleagues

According to Prof Charles Haddad, Associate Professor in Department of Zoology and Entomology, who is ranked 1 057 476 in the world and 742 out of 17 009 authors in the SubField 1 (Zoology), it is a great honour being included in the World’s Top 2% Scientists’ list. “But this was only possible because of collaborative work with several international colleagues and high productivity regarding scientific publications.”

This is the third time Prof Haddad, who does research on spider taxonomy, biodiversity and ecology has made it on the list: in 2021 (rank 645 823) and 2022 (822 007).

He is currently working on projects looking at the biodiversity and species turnover of spiders along two transects in South Africa, a latitudinal transect in the Succulent Karoo Biome in the western interior (with South African collaborators), and a longitudinal study of fynbos and forest leaf litter spiders along the southern mountains of the country (with UFS Research Associate Dr Danilo Harms from Germany).

Other UFS scientists included in the single-year data set:

  • Prof John M. Carranza (Geology, 5 259)
  • Prof Muhammad Altaf Khan (Applied Mathematics, 23 035)
  • Prof Melanie Walker (Centre for Development Support, 45 614)
  • Prof Hendrik Swart (Physics, 51 405)
  • Prof Brownhilder Neneh (Business Management, 55 867)
  • Dr Kashif Ali Abro (Applied Mathematrics, 56 321) 
  • Dr Bradley Ridoutt (Agricultural Economics, 57 870)
  • Prof John Owen (Centre for Development Support, 57 937)
  • Prof Jeanet Conradie (Chemistry, 63 722)
  • Prof Maxim Finkelstein (Statistics/ Mathematical Statistics, 76 828)
  • Dr Seda Igret Araz (Applied Mathematics,99 541)
  • Dr Kovo G Akpomie (Chemistry, 118 903)
  • Prof Maryke Labuschagne (Plant Sciences,128 714)
  • Prof Johan Grobbelaar (Plant Sciences, 145 884)
  • Prof Deborah Posel (Sociology, 158 042)
  • Prof David Motaung (Physics, 168 727)
  • Prof Andrew Marston (Chemistry, 206 048)
  • Prof RE Kroon (Physics, 294 119)
  • Dr Yuri Marusik (Zoology and Entomology, 627 841)

The career-long data set includes the names of:

  • Prof Atangana (3 985)
  • Prof Peltzer (9 861)
  • Prof Carranza (15 238)
  • Prof Louis Scott (Palaeontology, 55 996)
  • Prof Walker (69 878)
  • Prof Grobbelaar (73 955)
  • Prof Swart (90 903)
  • Prof Robert Schall (Pharmacology and Pharmacy, 91 632)
  • Prof Andrew Marston (Chemistry, 93 813)
  • Prof HA Snyman (Animal, Wildlife and Grassland Sciences, 95 354)
  • Prof Finkelstein (113 986)
  • Robert WM Frater Cardiovascular Research Centre (118 326)
  • Prof Johan Visser (Geology, 127 447)
  • Prof Khan (137 516)
  • Dr Ridoutt (148 202)
  • Prof Conradie (155 242)
  • Prof Posel (169 254)
  • Prof Labuschagne (228 016)
  • Prof Owen (230 036)
  • Prof Robert Cryer (Public Law, 250 277)
  • Dr Abro (264 210)
  • Prof Haddad (710 764)

News Archive

You touch a woman, you strike a rock
2004-11-02

Prof. Engela Pretorius van die Departement Sosiologie in die Fakulteit Geesteswetenskappe by die Universiteit van die Vrystaat het die kwessie omtrent feminisme aangespreek tydens haar intreerede met die onderwerp, You touch a woman, you strike a rock: Feminism(s) and emancipation in South Africa .

Prof. Pretorius het gesê: “Die geskiedenis van feminisme oor die algemeen kan in drie fases verdeel word, waarna verwys word as golwe. Eerste-golf-feminisme (19de eeu) het die fokus geplaas op die beskerming van vroueregte in die openbare terrein, spesifiek die reg om te stem, die reg tot onderrig en die reg om middelklas beroepe en professies te betreë.

Vroeë tweede-golf-feminisme word onthou vir hoe dit moederskap geteoretiseer het as synde ‘n onderdrukkende instelling. Slagspreuke van die 1970s was die persoonlike is polities en susterskap is magtig. Prof. Pretorius sê beide slagspreuke bevestig die idee dat vroue universeel onderdruk en uitgebuit word en slegs deur erkenning van dié situasie kan vroue die strukture wat hul onderdruk verander.

‘n Belangrike aspek van die derde golf van die feminisme-teorie is post-moderne feminisme wat diversiteit en verskille onderstreep. Die poging van hierdie feministe is afgestem op alle vorme van onderdrukking. Vroue van kleur het ook hul ontevredenheid uitgespreek gedurende die derde-golf-feminisme. Die feminisme van vroue van kleur word gekenmerk deur verskeie kwessies en talryke intellektuele standpuntinnames wat neerslaga vind in verskillende terme, soos Afrika feminisme of ‘womanism, sê prof. Pretorius.

Afrika-feminisme dui protes aan teen die wit/westerse geskiedenis en die wit/westerse dominansie binne feminisme. Afrika-vroue het besef dat hul onderdrukking verskillend is van dié van wit vroue en daarom is ‘n ander proses van bevryding nodig. Die Westerse feministiese praktyk om swart vroue by die bestaande feministiese ontologie te voeg, is nie voldoende nie omdat hul unieke ondervindings van slawerny, kolonialisme, onderdrukking deur mans en armoede nie uitgedruk word nie.

‘Womanism’ het tot stand gekom as gevolg van ‘n eksplisiete rassekritiek teen feminisme. Dit is ten gunste van die positiewe uitbeelding van swart mense. Dit word gekenmerk deur kulturele kontekstualisasie, die sentraliteit van die gesin en die belangrikheid daarvan om mans in te sluit.

Die geskiedenis van vroue in Suid-Afrika is verwant aan hul geskiedenis van onderdrukking as gevolg van patriargie. Vroue van verskillende rasse, kulture en klasse het patriargie op verskillende wyses in en variërende mate van erns ervaar. Onder voor-koloniale patriargie het vroue min sê gehad oor huwelikskeuses omdat mans dié besluite gedomineer het.

Die Nederlandse en Britse patriargale erfenis het neerslag gevind in die ideologie van die volksmoeder. Onderwyl dit veral manlike skrywers was wat die beeld van die vrou as versorger en tuisteskepper bevorder het, het vroue self ook hieraan ‘n aandeel gehad, sodat die volksmoeder volwaardig deel geword het van die Afrikaner nasionalistiese mitologie. Alhoewel middel- en werkersklas vroue met dié beeld geïdentifiseer het, het nie alle Afrikaanse vroue die ideologie aanvaar nie.

Onder die Victoriaanse erfenis was Britse vroue beperk to die private eerder as die openbare lewe. Die skeefgetrekte onderrigsisteem wat vroue in huishoudelike loopbane gekanaliseer het, die mag van mans oor hul vroue se eiendom en ‘n tekort aan toegang tot mag en geld het verseker dat vroue by die huis gebly het.

Wit Engelssprekende-vroue het die grootste geleentheid gehad om patriargie uit te daag vanweë hul toegang tot onderwys en die blootstelling aan liberale waardes, sê prof. Pretorius. Liberale vroue soos Helen Joseph en Helen Suzman het ‘n belangrike rol gespeel om in 1930 stemreg vir wit vroue in Suid-Afrika te verseker en het voortgegaan om ‘n rol te speel in die bevryding van swart vroue gedurende die vryheidstryd.

Die feminisme wat onder swart vroue ontwikkel het, was ‘n erkenning van die gemeenskaplike stryd met swart mans om die verwydering van die juk van eksterne onderdrukking en eksploitasie. Swart vroue in aktiewe en onafhanlike politiese rolle het tegelykertyd mans se aannames omtrent hul meerderwaardigheid asook die rassewette van die staat uitgedaag. Daarom kan ons sê dat die feminisme wat hier ontwikkel het, te voorskyn gekom het as gevolg van vroue se betrokkenheid by en toewyding tot nasionale bevryding, sê prof. Pretorius.

Institusionalisering is nie herlei tot magsvoordele nie, want gelykheid is nie in beleidsprogramme geïnkorporeer nie. Die hervestiging van sleutel aktiviste van die vrouebeweging in die regering het die stryd om genderbillikheid verander na ‘n projek wat deur die regering gelei word, sê prof. Pretorius. Ongelukkig word terreine van verandering buite die grense van die regering verwaarloos. Dit kan slegs aangespreek word deur ‘n aktiewe en feministiese stem in die burgerlike samelewing.

“Dit is my oortuiging dat formele instellings vir vroue binne die staat oor die lang termyn slegs effektief kan wees indien daar ‘n effektiewe feministiese vroue-beweging buite die staat in stand gehou word wat die grondslag waarop sosiale beleid gevorm word, kan uitdaag en bevraagteken. Daarom, A luta continua (die stryd duur voort),” sê prof. Pretorius.

Mediaverklaring
Uitgereik deur: Lacea Loader
Mediaverteenwoordiger
Tel: (051) 401-2584
Sel: 083 645 2454
E-pos: loaderl.stg@mail.uovs.ac.za
2 November 2004

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept